On čt 4. září 2008, Ladislav Slezak wrote:
Stefan Hundhammer wrote: [...]
Now I can't help that sinking feeling that there might be even more. If there is a significant number of cases where it makes sense to not enforce that sanity check (must have only one button or both okButton and cancelButton), we have to get rid of that check. But I still think that it's useful.
My question is why is the failed check considered as a fatal error? Isn't it rather a minor problem? Would be an y2warning message enough instead of aborting the module?
I agree. Seems strange that such developer's error that could be considered cosmetic has such consequences. j -- Jiri Suchomel SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: jsuchome@suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 960 190 00 Praha 9, Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org