On 2011-11-08 00:37:09 +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:37:09 +0100 From: Christian Boltz <opensuse@cboltz.de> Subject: Re: [opensuse-web] Re: [opensuse-wiki] openSUSE.org Security Alert To: opensuse-web@opensuse.org Cc: Thomas Schmidt <tom@opensuse.org>, Matthew Ehle <mehle@novell.com>, opensuse-wiki@opensuse.org
Hello,
Am Montag, 7. November 2011 schrieb Thomas Schmidt:
On 07.11.2011 16:18, Matthew Ehle wrote:
I know you have suggested this before. In all honesty, it doesn't really matter whether I use subversion or not, especially with the way that we have to upgrade these wikis. Getting the MW core code is the easy part. I just download, extract, and move a couple of files over.
That's still more work when compared to "svn up". And even more work if you have to modify one of the mediawiki files - you have to (remember to) patch it again at every update. (I'm quite sure index.php is modified for iChain, and MultiBoilerplate contains a patch from me to support different templates per namespace)
I know that using svn doesn't change much on _this_ update - but it will save you time on the _next_ updates.
Counter-question: what's the advantage of using the tarball? ;-)
that we can track all local changes, like theme, different auth provider and so on. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+owner@opensuse.org