
After installing 8.2 on a new server, swat is not accessable from a client browser with the url http://192.168.0.12:901. An error occured while loading http://192.168.0.12:901: Connection to host 192.168.0.12 is broken Access is fine from localhost:901 on the server lsof -i returns: xinetd 2058 root 5u IPv4 4803 TCP *:swat (LISTEN) netstat -tupan returns: tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:901 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2058/xinetd Firewall is not installed. Swat access worked "out of the box" with 8.1 Am I missing something obvious? TIA, -- Jim Barnes -- Certainly the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you; if you don't bet, you can't win. -Lazarus Long -- SuSE linux 8.0, 2.4.18-4GB, KMail 1.4 -- 12:04pm up 2 days, 22:44, 8 users, load average: 1.37, 1.29, 1.21

on 8.1 I had to enable in inetd it didn't work out of the box for me, same in 8.2 Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Barnes" <j10152@amigo.net> To: <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:37 PM Subject: [SLE] 8.2, swat, and port 901 After installing 8.2 on a new server, swat is not accessable from a client browser with the url http://192.168.0.12:901. An error occured while loading http://192.168.0.12:901: Connection to host 192.168.0.12 is broken Access is fine from localhost:901 on the server lsof -i returns: xinetd 2058 root 5u IPv4 4803 TCP *:swat (LISTEN) netstat -tupan returns: tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:901 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2058/xinetd Firewall is not installed. Swat access worked "out of the box" with 8.1 Am I missing something obvious? TIA, -- Jim Barnes -- Certainly the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you; if you don't bet, you can't win. -Lazarus Long -- SuSE linux 8.0, 2.4.18-4GB, KMail 1.4 -- 12:04pm up 2 days, 22:44, 8 users, load average: 1.37, 1.29, 1.21 -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com

On Wednesday 30 April 2003 20:37, Jim Barnes wrote:
Firewall is not installed. Swat access worked "out of the box" with 8.1 Am I missing something obvious?
edit /etc/xinetd.d/samba, change variable only_from. Read "man xinetd.conf" for specifics. perhaps adding something like 192.168.0.0/24

On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 13:37, Jim Barnes wrote:
After installing 8.2 on a new server, swat is not accessable from a client browser with the url http://192.168.0.12:901.
An error occured while loading http://192.168.0.12:901: Connection to host 192.168.0.12 is broken
Access is fine from localhost:901 on the server
lsof -i returns: xinetd 2058 root 5u IPv4 4803 TCP *:swat (LISTEN)
netstat -tupan returns: tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:901 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2058/xinetd
Firewall is not installed. Swat access worked "out of the box" with 8.1 Am I missing something obvious?
Well, I don't know how obvious it is, but it's the difference between 192.168.0.12 and 127.0.0.1. Localhost is the latter, and that will work, because that's permitted by /etc/xinetd.d/swat. If you want this to work using your normal IP address, you'll need to add it to that file. Just use a space to separate it, and if you don't want any other machines on the network to access it, use "192.168.0.12/32". Otherwise, it'd be "192.168.0.0/24". After changing, be sure to `/etc/init.d/xinetd reload'. Regards, dk -- David "Dunkirk" Krider, http://www.davidkrider.com Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being." Linux: Will you use the power for good... or for AWESOME?

Thanks Manx, Anders, and David. the entry only_from = 127.0.0.0 192.168.0.5 in /etc/xinetd.d/samba Allowed access. Yes, something obvious. -- Jim Barnes -- Certainly the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you; if you don't bet, you can't win. -Lazarus Long -- SuSE linux 8.0, 2.4.18-4GB, KMail 1.4 -- 1:48pm up 3 days, 27 min, 8 users, load average: 1.08, 1.13, 1.14
participants (4)
-
Anders Johansson
-
David Krider
-
Jim Barnes
-
Manx Biaggi