Re: [S.u.S.E. Linux] FYI Linus Trovalds in InforWorld]
On Sun, Jun 28, 1998 at 12:42:45AM +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
Hi!
Trying to kill the keyboard, hlarons@mail.comcat.com produced:
Communications by Mutt 0.89
Aehm, what have you done to poor mutt? Not only you produce 2 X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1 lines in the header, but you have neither a "References:" nor an "In-Reply-To:" line in your header.
I appreciate the feedback from "the real world." To answer your ?s: * I have no idea why the dup X-Mailer headers appear. I'll check .muttrc again. * I nulled the References and I-R-T headers intentionally. What do they really add? Who actually looks at/uses them? This isn't a smart-ass answer; if there's a good reason for them to be there, I'll put them back. * Mutt 0.89 seems OK to me. What does 0.91 offer? I follow Welsh and Kaufman's advice ("Running Linux") about not upgrading when something works.
(and you haven't upgraded to 0.91.1(i), either :-)
* Mutt 0.89 seems OK to me. What does 0.91 offer? I follow Welsh and Kaufman's advice ("Running Linux") about not upgrading when something works.
-Wolfgang
Howard Arons -- Powered by SuSE Linux 5.2 -- kernel 2.0.33 Communications by Mutt 0.89 - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
On Sun, Jun 28, 1998 at 08:59 -0400, Howard Arons wrote:
* I nulled the References and I-R-T headers intentionally. What do they really add? Who actually looks at/uses them? This isn't a smart-ass answer; if there's a good reason for them to be there, I'll put them back.
The good reason is that mailers like mutt use the References header for threading. Ciao, Stefan - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Hi!
Trying to kill the keyboard, hlarons@mail.comcat.com produced:
> * I nulled the References and I-R-T headers intentionally. What do they
> really add? Who actually looks at/uses them? This isn't a smart-ass
> answer; if there's a good reason for them to be there, I'll put them
> back.
Read RFC 1036, References is required in Replies. Threading is
done using it.
> > (and you haven't upgraded to 0.91.1(i), either :-)
> * Mutt 0.89 seems OK to me. What does 0.91 offer? I follow Welsh and
> Kaufman's advice ("Running Linux") about not upgrading when something
> works.
Over 600 Lines in ChangeLog, bugfixes (incl. memory leaks,
segfaults, ...) and features (better viewing, faster threading,
pgp5, some new config-options, ... )
Mutt is still in development.
-Wolfgang
--
PGP 2 welcome: Mail me, subject "send PGP-key".
If you've nothing at all to hide, you must be boring.
Unsolicited Bulk E-Mails: *You* pay for ads you never wanted.
Is our economy _so_ weak we have to tolerate SPAMMERS? I guess not.
-
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
participants (3)
-
hlarons＠mail.comcat.com -
stefan.troeger＠wirtschaft.tu-chemnitz.de -
weissel＠jupiter.ph-cip.uni-koeln.de