semi-[OT] "christmas" trimmings all year long
All, We seem to be getting lots of new people on the list recently, which is generally a good thing. However, some participants seem to be a little inexperienced in how to write a reply. Remember, this is not ICQ and Instant Messaging. You have some control over where and how your text appears. Use it wisely. In the interests of peace, good order, and getting lots of helpful responses, would everybody please: - edit your replies -- that means trim off everything from the old message except the paragraph or two to which you are replying. Never reproduce somebody's signature and tag-lines, unless that is specifically what you are replying to. If somebody included a lengthy excerpt from a log file or a shell script, or program output, then everybody in the list received it at least once. They don't need you to quote it to them again - trim it out of your reply. - write your replies below the material to which you are replying -- that means, either start writing at the bottom, or else write your replies between paragraphs of the other person's message, and there should be no quoted text after your last sentence. Writing your replies above quoted material is called "top-posting" and it seems to offend some of the old-timers (the people with the most experience and knowledge, whom you would therefore least like to offend...), and it makes it difficult to follow an ongoing conversation. As well, if you leave a lot of untrimmed quoted text in a message, it annoys people who scroll all the way down, only to find out that you made them waste their time. People who are receiving a digest version have to scroll past all your useless quoting just to get to the next message in the digest. You want to be more polite and accommodating than that, don't you? Good. We appreciate it. If you are using KMail, then when you see a sentence or a paragraph that really needs a response from you, highlight just that piece of text and press the "L" key. This creates a new message in the thread, containing only the text that you highlighted, and addressed to the mailing list (not to the original sender, who doesn't really need or want to see two copies of your reply in his in-box). In other words, text-select plus "L" key does most of the things that list-etiquette requests. The only thing that it doesn't seem to do automatically is to place your cursor at a starting position below the last line of quoted text. I guess the makers of KMail wanted to leave something for you to do. If you are using another mail program that doesn't support these KMail functions........ fake it. There. It's not Christmas or Hannukah yet, and I'm not sure about the other observances, but it is the solstice today.... so enjoy a lovely solstice and trim, trim, trim. Cheers, Kevin
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 18:34, elefino wrote:
In other words, text-select plus "L" key does most of the things that list-etiquette requests. The only thing that it doesn't seem to do automatically is to place your cursor at a starting position below the last line of quoted text. I guess the makers of KMail wanted to leave something for you to do.
Learn something new everyday - it was the lowercase 'l' for me but I guess it's harder to identify. Cool e-mail and well put. Cheers Phil -- Phil Burness Linux User since 1991 - currently using SuSE 9.3 Warrington - United Kingdom
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 18:55 +0000, Phil Burness wrote:
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 18:34, elefino wrote:
In other words, text-select plus "L" key does most of the things that list-etiquette requests. The only thing that it doesn't seem to do automatically is to place your cursor at a starting position below the last line of quoted text. I guess the makers of KMail wanted to leave something for you to do.
Learn something new everyday - it was the lowercase 'l' for me but I guess it's harder to identify. Cool e-mail and well put.
Evolution uses ctrl-l for a list reply. Well put and -not- OT by any means. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998
At 01:34 PM 12/21/2005 -0500, elefino wrote:
Content-Disposition: inline
All,
It's not Christmas or Hannukah yet, and I'm not sure about the other observances, but it is the solstice today.... so enjoy a lovely solstice and trim, trim, trim.
You're right, it is the solstice, but interestingly enough, the sun has been setting slightly _later_ each day for at least a couple of weeks. No, I don't understand it, but you can check your daily papers if you still have them, and verify that. --doug -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date: 12/21/2005
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 19:55, Doug McGarrett wrote:
At 01:34 PM 12/21/2005 -0500, elefino wrote:
Content-Disposition: inline
All,
It's not Christmas or Hannukah yet, and I'm not sure about the other observances, but it is the solstice today.... so enjoy a lovely solstice and trim, trim, trim.
You're right, it is the solstice, but interestingly enough, the sun has been setting slightly _later_ each day for at least a couple of weeks. No, I don't understand it, but you can check your daily papers if you still have them, and verify that.
Check these out: http://www.larry.denenberg.com/earliest-sunset.html http://www.iers.org/iers/earth/rotation/ut1lod/ Dylan
--doug
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date: 12/21/2005
-- "The man who strikes first admits that his ideas have given out." (Chinese Proverb)
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 15:03, Dylan wrote:
Check these out:
http://www.larry.denenberg.com/earliest-sunset.html http://www.iers.org/iers/earth/rotation/ut1lod/
Excellent! Crystal-clear explanation, especially if you happen to have (as I do) some panelled juggling balls handy to help with the visualization. I'm bookmarking those pages all over the place. Thanks, Kevin (now I'm really, irretrievably OT, and must paint, must paint...)
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 20:47, elefino wrote:
Kevin (now I'm really, irretrievably OT, and must paint, must paint...)
--
Now you've taught me how to do this.... What colour are you painting the living room? :-) -- Phil Burness Linux User since 1991 - currently using SuSE 9.3 Warrington - United Kingdom
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 14:55, Doug McGarrett wrote:
You're right, it is the solstice, but interestingly enough, the sun has been setting slightly _later_ each day for at least a couple of weeks. No, I don't understand it, but you can check your daily papers if you still have them, and verify that.
I've just started researching a related "problem" of physics and celestial mechanics: The clock is stable, but as the daylight shrinks, the day shrinks more at one end than the other (according to reported sunrise and sunset times on the environment Canada website). I don't quite get how that could be possible. Intuitively, the shrinkage of the day, approaching a solstice, should be symmetrical. Your little observation is just a further monkey-wrench in the works. I think that somebody is messing with our minds. Hmm. A winter solstice is the day that the sun follows its lowest (most southerly for us) path across the sky. In Australia, it's currently the summer solstice, and for them the sun travelled its highest (most southerly) path. Therefore, for us it was visible for the least amount of daylight, and for them it was visible the most today. Perhaps the local discrepancy is because we have hills or mountains in just the wrong places between us and sections of our horizon. Maybe the prairie people get proper, orderly, symmetrical daylight shrinkage and growage ( :-) . If that's the problem, it would shift around, depending on where the physical measurements were taken. Things that make you go "hmmm". There are couple of astronomy apps in the SuSE 10 offering. Maybe I'll see if they're any help (desperate stab to get this on-topic... didn't work, did it?). Kevin (on 'vacation' and supposed to be painting that living room)
participants (5)
-
Doug McGarrett
-
Dylan
-
elefino
-
Ken Schneider
-
Phil Burness