El Lun 19 Dic 2005 07:53, Philipp Thomas escribió:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:53:17 -0500, LDB wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find GCC3 for SuSE 10.0?
You'll have to compile it on your own. But may I ask why you think you need it?
Philipp
I am not sure what the reasons the original poster has, but in my case, I had to return to 9.3 because the software I'm working on would not compile using GCC 4. I would be interested in knowing if GCC 3 is available for SUSE 10. Regards. -- Alfredo Cole-Tuckler
Alfredo Cole wrote:
El Lun 19 Dic 2005 07:53, Philipp Thomas escribió:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:53:17 -0500, LDB wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find GCC3 for SuSE 10.0?
You'll have to compile it on your own. But may I ask why you think you need it?
Philipp
I am not sure what the reasons the original poster has, but in my case, I had to return to 9.3 because the software I'm working on would not compile using GCC 4. I would be interested in knowing if GCC 3 is available for SUSE 10.
Regards.
I am glad to here it was not only me. :) I hate compiling because it is not like compiling an application (for example xdaliclock). You have to ensure that it compiles without errors and ensure "make -k check" passes all tests. It is nothing to be taken lightly if you are going to be using it for serious application compilations. I just hate compiling it on my own and debugging. :(( Oh well .. LDB
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:16:47 -0500, LDB wrote:
You have to ensure that it compiles without errors and ensure "make -k check" passes all tests.
If there are tests in a package.
It is nothing to be taken lightly if you are going to be using it for serious application compilations.
Funny, I only ran gcc's testsuite when I had changed gcc code. Philipp
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:00:57 +0600, Alfredo Cole wrote:
because the software I'm working on would not compile using GCC 4.
If you're working on software, you should be able to fix the code instead of downgrading gcc. Everything gcc 4 flags as an error is indead an error in the software and has to be fixed. In many cases, gcc4 reports errors where older versions of gcc silently produced wrong code. Is that better? Philipp
participants (3)
-
Alfredo Cole -
LDB -
Philipp Thomas