I would appreciate some help understanding an error message I have received on trying to run a program. I have just installed a program called bookcase, which is a frontend for an xml based data file on book collections. The ./configure make (su) checkinstall went fine with no errors. The rpm is installed. However, when trying to run the program from a terminal window I get this error message: Quote: ~> /usr/local/kde/bin/bookcase /opt/kde3/lib/kde3/plugins/styles/dotnet.so: Feature dotNET already defined in /opt/kde3/lib/kde3/plugins//styles/dotnet.so! /opt/kde3/lib/kde3/plugins/styles/light.so: Feature Light, 2nd revision already defined in /opt/kde3/lib/kde3/plugins//styles/light.so! /opt/kde3/lib/kde3/plugins/styles/light.so: Feature Light, 3rd revision already defined in /opt/kde3/lib/kde3/plugins//styles/light.so! KCrash: crashing.... crashRecursionCounter = 2 KCrash: Application Name = bookcase path = <unknown> pid = 21617 Alarm clock ~> Endquote: Is this something to do with the program looking for old libraries - certainly it does not seem to like something in the KDE environment. It also appears to have a path problem, that I could probably fix. Any guidance appreciated! I am running SuSE8.0 with KDE3.0.2
Greetings, We are busy installing SuSE 8.0 on a Xeon 450 here at work. It has an onboard Adaptec AIC 7896 SCSI Controller. When attempt to load the SCSI Modules I get: aic7xxx_abort returns 0x2002 I have just flashed the BIOS and I have tried a few things that I found on Google, but it still isn't working. The SCSI Controller and Drives definitely work as the machine just recently had Win NT and Win 2000 installed on it (as recently as yesterday). Under reccomendation I loaded an earlier version of SuSE (SuSE 7.2) and the controller works perfectly. So now I am rather confused. :/ Any help will be greatly appreciated. Q
Hi, I wish s'one at SuSe would take this up. I've posted about 110 queries about aix7xxx AND aic7xxx_old and it just does not fly with my AIC 7890 You're in for a rough ride with this one I am trying to pull this down, too, so let's keep each other posted. My current "workaround" is to run a 2.2 kernel :-( hth dan Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2002 14:11 schrieb Quinton Delpeche:
Greetings,
We are busy installing SuSE 8.0 on a Xeon 450 here at work. It has an onboard Adaptec AIC 7896 SCSI Controller.
When attempt to load the SCSI Modules I get:
aic7xxx_abort returns 0x2002
I have just flashed the BIOS and I have tried a few things that I found on Google, but it still isn't working.
The SCSI Controller and Drives definitely work as the machine just recently had Win NT and Win 2000 installed on it (as recently as yesterday).
Under reccomendation I loaded an earlier version of SuSE (SuSE 7.2) and the controller works perfectly. So now I am rather confused. :/
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Q
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 05:13 am, Dan Am wrote:
Hi, I wish s'one at SuSe would take this up. I've posted about 110 queries about aix7xxx AND aic7xxx_old and it just does not fly with my AIC 7890 You're in for a rough ride with this one I am trying to pull this down, too, so let's keep each other posted. My current "workaround" is to run a 2.2 kernel :-( hth dan
[snip]
I too would appreciate being kept in the loop about these aic7xxx problems, particularly under SuSE 8.x distributions (kernel >= 2.4.18) . Even reverting back to the 7.2 distro / 2.4.4 kernel, there's been much unhappiness since I tried the upgrade to 8.0. Dan, was it you who started the thread last August about the parity error issue? That thread ended, IIRC, with someone suggesting using the APIC boot parameter. Did you try that? Thanks, -- --Gregory
Am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2002 21:18 schrieb Gregory Sawyer:
Dan, was it you who started the thread last August about the parity error issue? That thread ended, IIRC, with someone suggesting using the APIC boot parameter. Did you try that? Yep , that was me, I tried everything there and ended up switching back to kernel 2.2. This came up again, because I thought, well, in 8.1 they must have fixed it. See also my reply to Harry ten Berge. I seem to be getting somewhere slowly.
Best Dan
Quinton Delpeche wrote:
Greetings,
We are busy installing SuSE 8.0 on a Xeon 450 here at work. It has an onboard Adaptec AIC 7896 SCSI Controller.
When attempt to load the SCSI Modules I get:
aic7xxx_abort returns 0x2002
I have just flashed the BIOS and I have tried a few things that I found on Google, but it still isn't working.
The SCSI Controller and Drives definitely work as the machine just recently had Win NT and Win 2000 installed on it (as recently as yesterday).
Under reccomendation I loaded an earlier version of SuSE (SuSE 7.2) and the controller works perfectly. So now I am rather confused. :/
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Q
I have this same error.. I have yet to resolve the problem, I am running suse kernel 2.4.16... Which kernel are you running? Further- when you get this error does your machine hard lock? What I find is that I can write to the tape device hanging on this card(2940UW) for several hundred megabytes and then for no apparent reason I get this error. Regards- Jim
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 10:16 am, Jim Bonnet wrote:
I have this same error.. I have yet to resolve the problem, I am running suse kernel 2.4.16... Which kernel are you running? Further- when you get this error does your machine hard lock?
What I find is that I can write to the tape device hanging on this card(2940UW) for several hundred megabytes and then for no apparent reason I get this error.
Regards- Jim
Are you sure you are running the aic7xxx_old module?? I've never had any problems with that module (and I think the new one is a piece of crap) on 2940UW's or the newer xx160 controllers. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall bmarsh@bmarsh.com Bellaire, MI 10/23/02 10:44 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "Young men are fitter to invent than to judge, fitter for execution than for counsel, fitter for new projects than settled business." - Francis Bacon
Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 10:16 am, Jim Bonnet wrote:
I have this same error.. I have yet to resolve the problem, I am running suse kernel 2.4.16... Which kernel are you running? Further- when you get this error does your machine hard lock?
What I find is that I can write to the tape device hanging on this card(2940UW) for several hundred megabytes and then for no apparent reason I get this error.
Regards- Jim
Are you sure you are running the aic7xxx_old module?? I've never had any problems with that module (and I think the new one is a piece of crap) on 2940UW's or the newer xx160 controllers.
I'm trying it now. I read that this helped the issue. I just got the new 2.4.19 kernel from SuSE and am running tests.. Stay tuned ;) Jim
Jim Bonnet wrote:
Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 10:16 am, Jim Bonnet wrote:
I have this same error.. I have yet to resolve the problem, I am running suse kernel 2.4.16... Which kernel are you running? Further- when you get this error does your machine hard lock?
What I find is that I can write to the tape device hanging on this card(2940UW) for several hundred megabytes and then for no apparent reason I get this error.
Regards- Jim
Are you sure you are running the aic7xxx_old module?? I've never had any problems with that module (and I think the new one is a piece of crap) on 2940UW's or the newer xx160 controllers.
I'm trying it now. I read that this helped the issue. I just got the new 2.4.19 kernel from SuSE and am running tests.. Stay tuned ;)
Jim
No joy- Now Im running this kernel: k_deflt-2.4.19-117 which I think is the latest offered.. Im now no longer getting machine hangs but instead a process that is bound to /dev/st0 waiting on a write that can not or will not complete.. In the logs I see this kernel debugging output: Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: scsi2:0:5:0: Attempting to queue an ABORT message Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: scsi2: Dumping Card State while idle, at SEQADDR 0x7 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: ACCUM = 0xf9, SINDEX = 0x57, DINDEX = 0x26, ARG_2 = Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: HCNT = 0x0 SCBPTR = 0x0 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: SCSISEQ = 0x12, SBLKCTL = 0x2 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: DFCNTRL = 0x0, DFSTATUS = 0x2d Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: LASTPHASE = 0x1, SCSISIGI = 0x0, SXFRCTL0 = 0x80 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: SSTAT0 = 0x5, SSTAT1 = 0xa Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: STACK == 0x3, 0x190, 0x160, 0x0 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: SCB count = 4 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Kernel NEXTQSCB = 2 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Card NEXTQSCB = 2 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: QINFIFO entries: Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Waiting Queue entries: Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Disconnected Queue entries: 0:3 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: QOUTFIFO entries: Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Sequencer Free SCB List: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Sequencer SCB Info: 0(c 0x4c, s 0x57, l 0, t 0x3) 1( Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Pending list: 3(c 0x48, s 0x57, l 0) Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Kernel Free SCB list: 1 0 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Untagged Q(5): 3 Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: DevQ(0:5:0): 0 waiting Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: (scsi2:A:5:0): Queuing a recovery SCB Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: scsi2:0:5:0: Device is disconnected, re-queuing SCB Oct 24 02:50:43 ns1 kernel: Recovery code sleeping Oct 24 02:50:44 ns1 kernel: Recovery SCB completes Oct 24 02:50:44 ns1 kernel: Recovery code awake Oct 24 02:50:44 ns1 kernel: aic7xxx_abort returns 0x2002 Oct 24 02:50:44 ns1 kernel: scsi2:0:5:0: Attempting to queue a TARGET RESET mess Oct 24 02:50:44 ns1 kernel: scsi2:0:5:0: Command not found Oct 24 02:50:44 ns1 kernel: aic7xxx_dev_reset returns 0x2002 Oct 24 02:50:49 ns1 kernel: scsi: device set offline - not ready or command retr Oct 24 02:50:50 ns1 kernel: st0: Error 10000 (sugg. bt 0x0, driver bt 0x0, host Oct 24 02:50:50 ns1 kernel: st0: Error 10000 (sugg. bt 0x0, driver bt 0x0, host I get similar results with both the drivers.. (_old and the new one) I have also toggled off acpi, apic, apm, and smp to really try and simplify my setup.. I'm starting to suspect hardware in my case but will keep messing with it..This tape drive was working recently. but hardware does fail..Its an HP T20e drive I get the symptoms when writing say a 20gb directory to the tape. It works just fine on smallish dir's but the big ones are problematic. Regards- Jim --
Hi again, Here is the diagnosis so far: --> SuSE 8.0 Professional -- Using both aic7xxx and aic7xxx_old modules, I get no joy. The module doesn't load and the system just goes into a loop. --> SuSE 7.3 Professional -- The SCSI contoller is automatically detected and it works beautifully (5x 34 GB HDD). --> SuSE 7.2 Professional -- Using the only aic7xxx module available. the SCSI controller works without any issues. My prognosis: --> The aic7xxx and aic7xxx_old modules in SuSE 8.0 are fubar. --> SuSE 8.0 kernel has some issues. My Conclusion: Due to the urgency of me having to get this machine up and running I do not have time to try and compile a custome kernel and do any further investigation. I am going to have to go forward (rather reluctantly) with SuSE 7.3 Professional. Regards Q On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 16:16, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Quinton Delpeche wrote:
Greetings,
We are busy installing SuSE 8.0 on a Xeon 450 here at work. It has an onboard Adaptec AIC 7896 SCSI Controller.
When attempt to load the SCSI Modules I get:
aic7xxx_abort returns 0x2002
I have just flashed the BIOS and I have tried a few things that I found on Google, but it still isn't working.
The SCSI Controller and Drives definitely work as the machine just recently had Win NT and Win 2000 installed on it (as recently as yesterday).
Under reccomendation I loaded an earlier version of SuSE (SuSE 7.2) and the controller works perfectly. So now I am rather confused. :/
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Q
I have this same error.. I have yet to resolve the problem, I am running suse kernel 2.4.16... Which kernel are you running? Further- when you get this error does your machine hard lock?
What I find is that I can write to the tape device hanging on this card(2940UW) for several hundred megabytes and then for no apparent reason I get this error.
Regards- Jim
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
Dear Quinton, I have a Adaptec 2940UW in my SuSE 8.1 machine and have had NO Problems. I have had problems on previous release as you did. But in 8.1 no errors or glitches. PeterB On Wednesday 23 October 2002 11:15 pm, Quinton Delpeche wrote:
Hi again,
Here is the diagnosis so far: --> SuSE 8.0 Professional -- Using both aic7xxx and aic7xxx_old modules, I get no joy. The module doesn't load and the system just goes into a loop.
--> SuSE 7.3 Professional -- The SCSI contoller is automatically detected and it works beautifully (5x 34 GB HDD).
--> SuSE 7.2 Professional -- Using the only aic7xxx module available. the SCSI controller works without any issues.
My prognosis: --> The aic7xxx and aic7xxx_old modules in SuSE 8.0 are fubar.
--> SuSE 8.0 kernel has some issues.
My Conclusion: Due to the urgency of me having to get this machine up and running I do not have time to try and compile a custome kernel and do any further investigation. I am going to have to go forward (rather reluctantly) with SuSE 7.3 Professional.
Regards Q
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 16:16, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Quinton Delpeche wrote:
Greetings,
We are busy installing SuSE 8.0 on a Xeon 450 here at work. It has an onboard Adaptec AIC 7896 SCSI Controller.
When attempt to load the SCSI Modules I get:
aic7xxx_abort returns 0x2002
I have just flashed the BIOS and I have tried a few things that I found on Google, but it still isn't working.
The SCSI Controller and Drives definitely work as the machine just recently had Win NT and Win 2000 installed on it (as recently as yesterday).
Under reccomendation I loaded an earlier version of SuSE (SuSE 7.2) and the controller works perfectly. So now I am rather confused. :/
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Q
I have this same error.. I have yet to resolve the problem, I am running suse kernel 2.4.16... Which kernel are you running? Further- when you get this error does your machine hard lock?
What I find is that I can write to the tape device hanging on this card(2940UW) for several hundred megabytes and then for no apparent reason I get this error.
Regards- Jim
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
-- -- Proud to be a SuSE Lnux User since 5.2 --
Hi, Excellent news... ...now all I have to do is wait for SuSE 8.1 to come to South Africa. :( Thanks Q On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 06:35, Peter B Van Campen wrote:
Dear Quinton,
I have a Adaptec 2940UW in my SuSE 8.1 machine and have had NO Problems. I have had problems on previous release as you did. But in 8.1 no errors or glitches.
PeterB
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 11:15 pm, Quinton Delpeche wrote:
Hi again,
Here is the diagnosis so far: --> SuSE 8.0 Professional -- Using both aic7xxx and aic7xxx_old modules, I get no joy. The module doesn't load and the system just goes into a loop.
--> SuSE 7.3 Professional -- The SCSI contoller is automatically detected and it works beautifully (5x 34 GB HDD).
--> SuSE 7.2 Professional -- Using the only aic7xxx module available. the SCSI controller works without any issues.
My prognosis: --> The aic7xxx and aic7xxx_old modules in SuSE 8.0 are fubar.
--> SuSE 8.0 kernel has some issues.
My Conclusion: Due to the urgency of me having to get this machine up and running I do not have time to try and compile a custome kernel and do any further investigation. I am going to have to go forward (rather reluctantly) with SuSE 7.3 Professional.
Regards Q
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 16:16, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Quinton Delpeche wrote:
Greetings,
We are busy installing SuSE 8.0 on a Xeon 450 here at work. It has an onboard Adaptec AIC 7896 SCSI Controller.
When attempt to load the SCSI Modules I get:
aic7xxx_abort returns 0x2002
I have just flashed the BIOS and I have tried a few things that I found on Google, but it still isn't working.
The SCSI Controller and Drives definitely work as the machine just recently had Win NT and Win 2000 installed on it (as recently as yesterday).
Under reccomendation I loaded an earlier version of SuSE (SuSE 7.2) and the controller works perfectly. So now I am rather confused. :/
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Q
I have this same error.. I have yet to resolve the problem, I am running suse kernel 2.4.16... Which kernel are you running? Further- when you get this error does your machine hard lock?
What I find is that I can write to the tape device hanging on this card(2940UW) for several hundred megabytes and then for no apparent reason I get this error.
Regards- Jim
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
-- --
Proud to be a SuSE Lnux User since 5.2
--
On 24 Oct 2002, Quinton Delpeche wrote:
Excellent news... ...now all I have to do is wait for SuSE 8.1 to come to South Africa. :(
You could try a FTP install, but since the official FTP servers are always
overloaded, it will go slow. Also I don't know how robust it is in case of
failures. When I did YOU, it downloaded most of the patches but got
errors on four of them, so it said "the download failed" and unlike on
previous versions, it didn't give the option of installing the files it did
get. (So I installed them by hand, and submitted a feedback report.)
Since we use SuSE Linux fairly heavily at UCLA Math Department, I've copied
my installation DVD onto our internal FTP server, and when I patch one
machine, I upload the patches too. Does SuSE have a position on enterprise
mirrors? (Like don't let the general public snarf the non-free packages.)
Can someone suggest good software for doing this right? The idea would be,
the day before we run YOU on every node of our Beowulf cluster, we sync
with one of the SuSE mirror sites, so we have the latest patches yet don't
beat the global mirrors to death like everyone else is doing.
James F. Carter Voice 310 825 2897 FAX 310 206 6673
UCLA-Mathnet; 6115 MSA; 405 Hilgard Ave.; Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095-1555
Email: jimc@math.ucla.edu http://www.math.ucla.edu/~jimc (q.v. for PGP key)
--g9PJqSPM002126.1035575548/simba.math.ucla.edu--
ReSent-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
ReSent-From: Jim Carter
Excellent news... ...now all I have to do is wait for SuSE 8.1 to come to South Africa. :(
You could try a FTP install, but since the official FTP servers are always overloaded, it will go slow. Also I don't know how robust it is in case of failures. When I did YOU, it downloaded most of the patches but got errors on four of them, so it said "the download failed" and unlike on previous versions, it didn't give the option of installing the files it did get. (So I installed them by hand, and submitted a feedback report.) Since we use SuSE Linux fairly heavily at UCLA Math Department, I've copied my installation DVD onto our internal FTP server, and when I patch one machine, I upload the patches too. Does SuSE have a position on enterprise mirrors? (Like don't let the general public snarf the non-free packages.) Can someone suggest good software for doing this right? The idea would be, the day before we run YOU on every node of our Beowulf cluster, we sync with one of the SuSE mirror sites, so we have the latest patches yet don't beat the global mirrors to death like everyone else is doing. James F. Carter Voice 310 825 2897 FAX 310 206 6673 UCLA-Mathnet; 6115 MSA; 405 Hilgard Ave.; Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095-1555 Email: jimc@math.ucla.edu http://www.math.ucla.edu/~jimc (q.v. for PGP key) --g9PJqSPM002126.1035575548/simba.math.ucla.edu--
On Thursday 24 October 2002 05:35, Peter B Van Campen wrote:
Dear Quinton,
I have a Adaptec 2940UW in my SuSE 8.1 machine and have had NO Problems. I have had problems on previous release as you did. But in 8.1 no errors or glitches.
PeterB
I am using the Adaptec 2930C for my scanners, works like a charme in SuSE8.0 and 8.1 -- Frits Wüthrich
participants (9)
-
Bruce Marshall -
Dan Am -
Frits Wüthrich -
Gregory Sawyer -
Jim Bonnet -
Jim Carter -
Paul Conn -
Peter B Van Campen -
Quinton Delpeche