Another one of marginal educational value... ----- Forwarded message from David Benfell ----- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:36:55 -0700 From: David Benfell To: Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO Subject: Re: [SLE] Support vs Support (Was: [SLE] util-linux and Kernel 2.4.3) User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <200104240018.f3O0IlM06883@www2.mrbrklyn.com>; from ruben@www2.mrbrklyn.com on Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 08:18:47PM -0400 X-stardate: [-30]6531.27 X-moon: The Moon is New On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 08:18:47PM -0400, Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO wrote:

The original /rc.d/boot - or some other script in that directory had a case in the shell script looking for kerneld and conf.modules or modules.conf or both or either ;)

If the loader is not initiallized correctly on boot, modules.conf, modprobe and depmod fails to work correctly. I really didn't want to rewrite half the system. Someone will acuse me of just not being smart enough and blaming my deficiencies on SuSe ;)

So. You have obviously failed to upgrade modutils. Despite what I and a bunch of other people have told you. You just want to complain. Go away. -- David Benfell benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html ----- End forwarded message ----- -- David Benfell benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html