[SuSE Linux] Now I know...my $.02
When I first found this mail group, I was about to receive my copy of 5.3. I wanted to see what was going on in the SuSE community since I had become deeply frustrated trying to gain aid from those in RedHat land. No offence to them as a whole, but some very rude individuals roam the newsgroups, ostensibly to help but really just lying in wait to flame inept newbies. I fit that definition to a couple, so I stopped asking any questions. I could see that RedHat 5.1 was broken and I wasn't in a mood to try and salvage it amid flame wars. I have enough experience in my past with chat to understand beyond need for reminding when to quit speaking publicly. Here, when I first received 5.3, I appeared to have been the first on this continent, quite literally. I simply placed my order before it was released. I don't know why some are still waiting. I was told it would come in the first week of Sept and it was here last Monday. Scott Winterton at SuSE was very helpful and kept me informed. I admit, however, that I probably bugged him until he sent it by overnight express, when they did. :) To the point, this group feels very comfortable. There is a wealth of experience here and compassion. I saw a couple of rude remarks about someone's leaving, but not from those who write daily. For me, Michael, your wisdom would have been sorely missed. Thanks for peering back inside. I don't know what everyone else thinks and I won't pretend to guess. My desire is to build a computer devoid of Gatesware, period. Linux looks like the best alternative to me, although I guess I could simply buy a Mac. I was brought kicking and screaming to this conclusion by my most recent experience with Microsoft IE40 and Outlook Express when I allowed what I thought was a benign upgrade of these two programs by the Microsoft website. Perhaps nobody cares, but if you have read this far Microsoft virtually turned my box into a Windows 98 lab rat with that maneuver. It does everything but splash the Win 98 logo. Now IE40, which used to be superb compared to NS (seriously, I think it is far better) is subject to the most bizarre faults and crashes. I won't go into it all here, this is not a forum. I just wanted to say that I really feel welcome in the SuSE arena. I feel they have the best concept of what a Linux user will want in their OS and you people (many more names than those that I have included) make it easy to continue trying. Even when I ask really stupid questions. Hope I haven't waxed too maudlin for you. Thank you all. Steve <A HREF="http://www.millsphoto.com"><A HREF="http://www.millsphoto.com</A">http://www.millsphoto.com</A</A>> - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
On Sat, 5 Sep 1998, Steve Mills wrote:
deeply frustrated trying to gain aid from those in RedHat land. No offence to them as a whole, but some very rude individuals roam the newsgroups, ostensibly to help but really just lying in wait to flame inept newbies. I fit that definition to a couple, so I stopped asking any questions. I could see that RedHat 5.1 was broken and I wasn't in a mood to try and salvage it amid flame wars. I have enough experience in my past with chat to understand beyond need for reminding when to quit speaking publicly. /snip>
I agree. The S.u.S.E. group is a great linux group. The past week has kind of sucked. There has been an influx of newbies ( not a bad thing) and the chaos of the new release and some very tense moments. I'll be glad when it settles down again. One thing ATYPICAL on S.u.S.E. is the lack of freqent violent flames which are not uncommon in linux circles--- and advice to newbies like 'here's how to fix your problem: 'cd / ; rm -rf /' :-) If you've been around linux/unix for a while---you can't help but enjoy the sanity. -M One is most dishonest towards one's God; he is not _permitted_ to sin. mail: mjohnson@pop3.aebc.com - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
At 05:24 05.09.98 -0700, you wrote:
does everything but splash the Win 98 logo. Now IE40, which used to be superb compared to NS (seriously, I think it is far better) is subject to the most bizarre faults and crashes.
Actually, on Win95, IE4 used to be much faster than NS. I think this is because IE4 probably grabs more direct system resources instead of going through some odd Win calls that NS uses, and besides, it wouldn't be beyond MS to deliberately slow down NS. Anyway, the point I was leading up to: I have installed NS4.04 from the SuSE 5.2 and now I have downloaded and installed NS4.5b1, and I found them to be much faster on Linux than on Win95. Yes, on the same hardware, too.... Don't ask me, but it is noticeable. Best wishes, Nils PS - When I got the 4.0 previews for Win95 they were very unstable....4.5b1 has been rock solid so far. <A HREF="http://privat.schlund.de/bartmoss/"><A HREF="http://privat.schlund.de/bartmoss/</A">http://privat.schlund.de/bartmoss/</A</A>> ICQ UIN: 3322540 - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
participants (3)
-
hekate@intergate.bc.ca
-
nils@work.de
-
steve@millsphoto.com