Hello I was stupid enough to install Suse 8, that seems to be either a tateless joke or Mandrake very cunning marketing plot, and I have experienced nothing but pain since then. At the moment I would like to get tar xfIv foo.tar.bz2 - or - tar xfzv bar.tar.gz to work, but no. No, I have to gunzip -c foo.tar.gz | tar xfv - Why Suse8 was shipped? This is certainly a very early alphaand bad one. --Jyry C:-( C:-/ C========8-O C8-/ C:-( M$-Outlook: Experience a new virus every day! - Koe uusi virus joka päivä!
At the moment I would like to get tar xfIv foo.tar.bz2 - or - tar xfzv bar.tar.gz
to work, but no. No, I have to
gunzip -c foo.tar.gz | tar xfv -
Why? What happens with the tar command? (Which, incidentally, works fine for me.) -- 2:13pm up 9 days, 4:26, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.10, 0.03
* Jyry Kuukkanen
Hello
I was stupid enough to install Suse 8, that seems to be either a tateless joke or Mandrake very cunning marketing plot, and I have experienced nothing but pain since then.
At the moment I would like to get tar xfIv foo.tar.bz2
I have been deprecated for a long time, use tar xfjv instead.
- or - tar xfzv bar.tar.gz
to work, but no. No, I have to
gunzip -c foo.tar.gz | tar xfv -
Weird. tar xfzv works fine here, can you show me what it says? -- Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort?" -- A. P. J.
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
* Jyry Kuukkanen
[May 08. 2002 15:08]: Hello
I was stupid enough to install Suse 8, that seems to be either a tateless joke or Mandrake very cunning marketing plot, and I have experienced nothing but pain since then.
At the moment I would like to get tar xfIv foo.tar.bz2
I have been deprecated for a long time, use tar xfjv instead.
- or - tar xfzv bar.tar.gz
to work, but no. No, I have to
gunzip -c foo.tar.gz | tar xfv -
Weird. tar xfzv works fine here, can you show me what it says?
Oh dear. Silly me. Too hasty sometimes :-) I had a bad CD-ROM drive that caused me trouble with .gz files and since "tar xfIv" is trule depreceted, "tar xfjv" works fine. Thanks for correcting my silly accusations. Shame, shame and brown paper bag for a month... --Jyry C:-( C:-/ C========8-O C8-/ C:-( M$-Outlook: Experience a new virus every day! - Koe uusi virus joka päivä!
On Wed, May 08, Jyry Kuukkanen wrote:
Hello
I was stupid enough to install Suse 8, that seems to be either a tateless joke or Mandrake very cunning marketing plot, and I have experienced nothing but pain since then.
At the moment I would like to get tar xfIv foo.tar.bz2
The correct option is: ( -I is no tar option). tar xfjv foo.tar.bz2
- or - tar xfzv bar.tar.gz
to work, but no. No, I have to
Maybe you should tell us the error message? Nobody can guess the solution if you don't tell us your problem.
Why Suse8 was shipped? This is certainly a very early alphaand bad one.
Looks like more an user error to me, it works fine here and nobody else complained until yet. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de SuSE Linux AG Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 D-90429 Nuernberg -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
::I was stupid enough to install Suse 8, that seems to be either a ::tateless joke or Mandrake very cunning marketing plot, and I have ::experienced nothing but pain since then. oh pulease... I have 9 co-workers using 8.0 on a daily basis as their workstations since we've stopped buying Sun workstations and went to PC's running SuSE. These 9 are just the new boxes that have been deployed. I have heard not one compliant and these are cranky old school Unix guys. I'll say it again as others have ..8.0 has had some changes...but I can also add that SuSE doesn't write gtar which is the tar that most Linux systems use..so blaming them for a tar malfunction is just goofy. ::tar xfIv foo.tar.bz2 Try this: tar -jxvf foo.tar.bz2 The -j tells tar that it's a bzip2 file. I found this out by doing a 'man tar'...imagine that. ::tar xfzv bar.tar.gz Try this: tar -zxvf bar.tar.gz The -z option tells tar that it's a gzip file..that hasn't changed. I just checked this out on my officemates 8.0 box. ::Why Suse8 was shipped? This is certainly a very early alphaand bad one. Alpha ..I think not..unless we are talking about AXP ;) -=Ben --=====-----=====-- mailto:ben@whack.org --=====-- If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little. -GC --=====-----=====--
On Wed, 08 May 2002 16:18:33 -0700, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
The -j tells tar that it's a bzip2 file. I found this out by doing a 'man tar'...imagine that.
I see that my man page for tar on this SuSE 7.3 system includes a description of the -j option. It has not always been so. Nor was there any description of any option for dealing with bzip2-tar files. It still includes the following verbiage: "The GNU folks, in general, abhor man pages, and create info documents instead. The maintainer of tar falls into this category. "This man page is neither complete, nor current, and was included in the Debian Linux packaging of tar entirely to reduce the frequency with which the lack of a man page gets reported as a bug in our defect tracking system." Unfortunately, there are a great many of us who abhor Info pages, finding them even less useful than man pages which are "neither complete, nor current." -- David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html
On 15 May 2002 at 18:00, David Benfell wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2002 16:18:33 -0700, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
The -j tells tar that it's a bzip2 file. I found this out by doing a 'man tar'...imagine that.
I see that my man page for tar on this SuSE 7.3 system includes a description of the -j option. It has not always been so. Nor was there any description of any option for dealing with bzip2-tar files.
[snip...]
Unfortunately, there are a great many of us who abhor Info pages, finding them even less useful than man pages which are "neither complete, nor current."
-- David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html
Ah! I'm pleased to note that I wasn't the only one who was irritated by that! alan -- http://www.ibgames.net/alan Registered Linux user #6822 http://counter.li.org
participants (7)
-
alan@ibgames.com
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
David Benfell
-
Derek Fountain
-
Jyry Kuukkanen
-
Mads Martin Jørgensen
-
Thorsten Kukuk