Is it just me or my setup, or is .9.9 worse than .9.8? I have found so many problems with .9.9's mail program I decided to go back to .9.8. It was more stable for me. Not a comforting thought as we near 1.0. :-( -- Joe & Sesil Morris New Tribes Mission Email Address: Joe_Morris@ntm.org Web Address: http://www.mydestiny.net/~joe_morris Registered Linux user 231871
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 11:17, Joe & Sesil Morris (NTM) wrote:
Is it just me or my setup, or is .9.9 worse than .9.8? I have found so many problems with .9.9's mail program I decided to go back to .9.8. It was more stable for me. Not a comforting thought as we near 1.0. :-(
-- Joe & Sesil Morris New Tribes Mission Email Address: Joe_Morris@ntm.org Web Address: http://www.mydestiny.net/~joe_morris Registered Linux user 231871
I have the same feeling .. i decided also to downgrade .. there seems to be a lot of memory leaks in it, and it's also slower regards Frederik Vos www.vosberg.be
On March 22, 2002 05:19 am, Frederik Vos wrote:
I have the same feeling .. i decided also to downgrade .. there seems to be a lot of memory leaks in it, and it's also slower
Seemed fairly fast to me but way too easy to crash. Haven't had a chance to play with it again. Nick
Hi
Is it just me or my setup, or is .9.9 worse than .9.8? I have found so many problems with .9.9's mail program I decided to go back to .9.8. It was more stable for me. Not a comforting thought as we near 1.0. :-(
I had exactly the same problems with 0.98 and Mozilla Composer so I went back to 0.97 on my SuSE workstation. Red Hat 7.xx RPMs. 0.98 seems to be okay on my Debian machine. I sent some mail up to the appropriate Mozilla lists. It was mostly ignored. As the 1.0 release comes along we would seem to be moving nearer to the dark days of the crashing Netscape saga. Thanks -- Richard www.sheflug.co.uk
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:17:37 +0800 "Joe & Sesil Morris (NTM)" <Joe_Morris@ntm.org> wrote:
Is it just me or my setup, or is .9.9 worse than .9.8? I have found so many problems with .9.9's mail program I decided to go back to .9.8. It was more stable for me. Not a comforting thought as we near 1.0. :-(
I stopped using mozilla for mail, and just downloaded the 9.9 browser. It works fine here in "browser-only" mode. --- $|=1;while(1){print pack("h*",'75861647f302d4560275f6272797f3');sleep(1); for(1..16){for(8,32,8,7){print chr($_);}select(undef,undef,undef,.05);}}
On Friday 22 March 2002 13.03, zentara wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 18:17:37 +0800
"Joe & Sesil Morris (NTM)" <Joe_Morris@ntm.org> wrote:
Is it just me or my setup, or is .9.9 worse than .9.8? I have found so many problems with .9.9's mail program I decided to go back to .9.8. It was more stable for me. Not a comforting thought as we near 1.0. :-(
I stopped using mozilla for mail, and just downloaded the 9.9 browser. It works fine here in "browser-only" mode.
I installed the beast yesterday and i've been running it on all kind of advanced websites with only one flaw: not running QuickTime files. I've checked the mail program and it seems to run just fine. Cheers, HÖ -- www.sacred-eagle.com
I installed the beast yesterday and i've been running it on all kind of advanced websites with only one flaw: not running QuickTime files. I've checked the mail program and it seems to run just fine.
Since that functionality is not part of Moz, it can hardly be said to be a flaw in it... -- James Ogley, Unix Systems Administrator, Pinnacle Insurance Plc james.ogley@pinnacle.co.uk www.pinnacle.co.uk +44 (0) 20 8731 3619 Using Free Software since 1994, running GNU/Linux (SuSE 7.x) This email was created and sent with Ximian Evolution 1.0.2 NEW: Advogato diary at www.advogato.org/person/riggwelter *********************************************************************** CONFIDENTIALITY. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Pinnacle Insurance Plc. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify our Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 8207 9555. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com **********************************************************************
On Friday 22 March 2002 13.43, James Ogley wrote:
I installed the beast yesterday and i've been running it on all kind of advanced websites with only one flaw: not running QuickTime files. I've checked the mail program and it seems to run just fine.
Since that functionality is not part of Moz, it can hardly be said to be a flaw in it... OK, wrong word, let's try this: ...with only one LACK: not running QuickTime files.
Cheers, HÖ -- www.sacred-eagle.com
I installed the beast yesterday and i've been running it on all kind of advanced websites with only one flaw: not running QuickTime files. I've checked the mail program and it seems to run just fine.
Since that functionality is not part of Moz, it can hardly be said to be a flaw in it... OK, wrong word, let's try this: ...with only one LACK: not running QuickTime files.
the only way to do that in linux is with the crossover plugin. apple still refuses to make a linux quicktime viewer.. -- trey
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Trey Gruel wrote: tg> > OK, wrong word, let's try this: tg> > ...with only one LACK: not running QuickTime files. tg> tg> the only way to do that in linux is with the crossover plugin. apple tg> still refuses to make a linux quicktime viewer.. tg> Think Bill has anything to do with that? :) tg> -- S.Toms - smotrs at mindspring.com - www.mindspring.com/~smotrs SuSE Linux v7.3+ - Kernel 2.4.10-4GB
On Friday 22 March 2002 07:33 am, Helgi Örn Helgason wrote:
I installed the beast yesterday and i've been running it on all kind of advanced websites with only one flaw: not running QuickTime files. I've checked the mail program and it seems to run just fine.
I'm running 0.99 now too. I haven't tried it's mail program, but the web browser seems to work OK; it even has anti-aliasing. I encountered a hang though when I accessed of all things a CNN webpage. You'd think that since CNN is a Time-Warner company that advertises Netscape at the top of the screen that it would work! -- The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense. -- E. W. Dijkstra
"Joe & Sesil Morris (NTM)" wrote:
Is it just me or my setup, or is .9.9 worse than .9.8? I have found so many problems with .9.9's mail program I decided to go back to .9.8. It was more stable for me. Not a comforting thought as we near 1.0. :-(
-- Joe & Sesil Morris New Tribes Mission Email Address: Joe_Morris@ntm.org Web Address: http://www.mydestiny.net/~joe_morris Registered Linux user 231871
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
I have similar trouble with v. 0.9.9. Where can I download the previous version, 0.9.8?
hwm@onetel.net.uk wrote:
I have similar trouble with v. 0.9.9. Where can I download the previous version, 0.9.8?
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla0.9.8/mozilla-i686-pc-lin... But I normally just rename my mozilla directory to add the version number, make a new mozilla folder and install the newest version there. So in this case, I just renamed the new one to mozilla-.9.9, renamed 9.8 to just mozilla, done. Seems a good way. -- Joe & Sesil Morris New Tribes Mission Email Address: Joe_Morris@ntm.org Web Address: http://www.mydestiny.net/~joe_morris Registered Linux user 231871
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Joe & Sesil Morris (NTM) wrote: jm> hwm@onetel.net.uk wrote: jm> jm> >I have similar trouble with v. 0.9.9. Where can I download the jm> >previous version, 0.9.8? jm> > jm> jm> http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla0.9.8/mozilla-i686-pc-lin... jm> But I normally just rename my mozilla directory to add the version jm> number, make a new mozilla folder and install the newest version jm> there. Or if your wanting the SuSE compiled package, then you can get it at ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/mozilla back to versions 0.9.4 are located there. jm> So in this case, I just renamed the new one to mozilla-.9.9, renamed jm> 9.8 to just mozilla, done. Seems a good way. jm> jm> -- S.Toms - smotrs at mindspring.com - www.mindspring.com/~smotrs SuSE Linux v7.3+ - Kernel 2.4.10-4GB
Hi
I have similar trouble with v. 0.9.9. Where can I download the previous version, 0.9.8?
http://www.mozilla.org Thanks -- Richard www.sheflug.co.uk
participants (11)
-
Frederik Vos -
Helgi Örn Helgason -
hwm＠onetel.net.uk -
James Ogley -
Joe & Sesil Morris (NTM) -
Joshua Lee -
Nick Zentena -
Richard Ibbotson -
S.Toms -
Trey Gruel -
zentara