Re: [SLE] not receiving all mail from the list
On 10/23/06, Ed McCanless <e_mccanless@bellsouth.net> wrote:
I seem to be receiving a very small percentage of the list mail, since about Sept. 21, 2006 (I believe the server was shut down for a couple of days.) Today I received 5 (so far), of about 35 I saw in the archives. Nothing came through over the week-end. Can someone tell me what could be causing this, how to correct it? --ED--
Last week there was a problem with the SuSE Filters I guess..which tagged most of the mails as SPAM. I guess those mails didn't pass through your filter..and so you never got any of those Emails. --
Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
Duff Mckagan wrote:
On 10/23/06, Ed McCanless <e_mccanless@bellsouth.net> wrote:
I seem to be receiving a very small percentage of the list mail,....
Last week there was a problem with the SuSE Filters I guess..which tagged most of the mails as SPAM. I guess those mails didn't pass through your filter..and so you never got any of those Emails.
Thanks, Duff I seem to be getting more today, but for the last month it has been very slow except for Mondays. I also noticed my post this morning was listed as SPAM. Maybe it's getting better now. --ED--
At 06:23 PM 10/23/2006 -0400, Ed McCanless wrote:
Duff Mckagan wrote:
On 10/23/06, Ed McCanless <e_mccanless@bellsouth.net> wrote:
I seem to be receiving a very small percentage of the list mail,....
Last week there was a problem with the SuSE Filters I guess..which tagged most of the mails as SPAM. I guess those mails didn't pass through your filter..and so you never got any of those Emails.
Thanks, Duff I seem to be getting more today, but for the last month it has been very slow except for Mondays. I also noticed my post this morning was listed as SPAM. Maybe it's getting better now. --ED--
I get between 50 and 120 emails a day from the list. If you're not getting them, then you should contact the list administrator. The problem with the heading SPAM has been noted on the list, but no help has been provided, AFAIK. --doug
* Doug McGarrett <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> [10-23-06 18:49]:
The problem with the heading SPAM has been noted on the list, but no help has been provided, AFAIK.
Posted here by Carlos. Was fixed (mostly) Monday. You haven't observed the missing 'SPAM' notice in the Subjects: ? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Doug McGarrett wrote:
I get between 50 and 120 emails a day from the list. If you're not getting them, then you should contact the list administrator.
The problem with the heading SPAM has been noted on the list, but no help has been provided, AFAIK.
--doug
Thanks Doug, The volume seems normal today. I will wait and see what happens tomorrow before I complain more. -- ED --
Mail seemed normal on the 23rd. Dropped off substantially on the 24th. On the 25th October I only received about six mails from the list. There were about 30 concerning Skype, I received *one. *This is a subject I am interested in. There were about 40 others I did not receive. None of these were tagged as spam. What's wrong with the list (this is also a past subject I received no mail on)? -- ED -- P. S. I can't find the address for the list administrator.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2006-10-26 at 02:11 -0400, Ed McCanless wrote:
P. S. I can't find the address for the list administrator.
You got it with the welcome message from the list server. You can get it following the advice at the bottom of your email: |> For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFQIjctTMYHG2NR9URAs9IAKCWB3bp6MOOyzFIQTcRjV4T4RJdIACfY8Qn gFVybXpsTxi4Uo5FMmOeNfQ= =n+sm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thursday 26 October 2006 08:11, Ed McCanless wrote:
P. S. I can't find the address for the list administrator.
I still have a FAQ from suse-linux-e; 3rd & 4th line are:
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at suse-linux-e-owner@suse.com.
Cheers, Leen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Monday 2006-10-23 at 19:42 -0400, Doug McGarrett wrote:
The problem with the heading SPAM has been noted on the list, but no help has been provided, AFAIK.
Not true, action was taken. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFPWHotTMYHG2NR9URAn3rAJsES97PaUO/Obvv33aiTCKMM/HgegCdELw5 hRx4AzwAA90R/a+WdX5bN+s= =QU4v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 10/24/06, Carlos E. R. <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2006-10-23 at 19:42 -0400, Doug McGarrett wrote:
The problem with the heading SPAM has been noted on the list, but no help has been provided, AFAIK.
Not true, action was taken.
- -- Cheers, Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFFPWHotTMYHG2NR9URAn3rAJsES97PaUO/Obvv33aiTCKMM/HgegCdELw5 hRx4AzwAA90R/a+WdX5bN+s= =QU4v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Yes. I agree that the needful was done. Action was taken indeed. But still, Ed McCanless' post was tagged as SPAM. I guess they have a new filter now. If the post doesn't have the word SuSE, then its tagged as SPAM. --
Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2006-10-24 at 08:37 +0530, Duff Mckagan wrote:
Yes. I agree that the needful was done. Action was taken indeed. But still, Ed McCanless' post was tagged as SPAM.
I guess they have a new filter now. If the post doesn't have the word SuSE, then its tagged as SPAM.
The Bayes database was retrained. His email probably matched. Let me see... yes, that is: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES The Bayes database is not yet trained perfectly. It will happen again, I'm afraid. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFPfBMtTMYHG2NR9URAuwvAJ9zr+KIeik71qrNG0njGXwAeDiiuACfXyB8 8tosKCRy35nG6kSkJxfrA5I= =y6GT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 10/24/06, Carlos E. R. <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2006-10-24 at 08:37 +0530, Duff Mckagan wrote:
Yes. I agree that the needful was done. Action was taken indeed. But still, Ed McCanless' post was tagged as SPAM.
I guess they have a new filter now. If the post doesn't have the word SuSE, then its tagged as SPAM.
The Bayes database was retrained. His email probably matched. Let me see... yes, that is:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES
The Bayes database is not yet trained perfectly. It will happen again, I'm
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES This thing is quite abysmal. What does it mean? Lol..is it even worth explaining at all? I am curious anyways... -- http://mckagan.googlepages.com
* Duff Mckagan <mckagan@gmail.com> [10-24-06 12:47]:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES
This thing is quite abysmal. What does it mean? Lol..is it even worth explaining at all? I am curious anyways...
read 'man spamassassin' and/or 'perldoc Mail::Spamassassin::Conf' -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
On 10/25/06, Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri@gmail.com> wrote:
* Duff Mckagan <mckagan@gmail.com> [10-24-06 12:47]:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES>
This thing is quite abysmal. What does it mean? Lol..is it even worth explaining at all? I am curious anyways...
read 'man spamassassin' and/or 'perldoc Mail::Spamassassin::Conf'
Okay..Thanks. I shall do that. -- http://mckagan.googlepages.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2006-10-24 at 22:14 +0530, Duff Mckagan wrote:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES
This thing is quite abysmal. What does it mean? Lol..is it even worth explaining at all? I am curious anyways...
What is it you don't understand? (And please, trim your quotes) - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFPo6UtTMYHG2NR9URAlOaAKCTN8c50q/3sAt8+Qyj3rUV8pO2OACeNGBB CeM3un8fzVtfQUtNH4GH+GQ= =NQo1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (6)
-
Carlos E. R. -
Doug McGarrett -
Duff Mckagan -
Ed McCanless -
Leendert Meyer -
Patrick Shanahan