[opensuse] Current compiled list for missing kde4 features?
Dotan, Thanks for spear-heading the kde4 missing features effort. Is there currently a compiled list anywhere we can look at to compare the things we find against? That would be really helpful. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Dotan,
Thanks for spear-heading the kde4 missing features effort. Is there currently a compiled list anywhere we can look at to compare the things we find against? That would be really helpful. Thanks.
There was one on the Opensuse wiki, but I think it was deleted last time I looked. I will try to dig up a link. -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Here it is, I should go through it too: http://en.opensuse.org/What_features_is_KDE4_missing_when_compared_to_KDE3 This also may be relevant: http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/Ideas/11.1 -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Here it is, I should go through it too: http://en.opensuse.org/What_features_is_KDE4_missing_when_compared_to_KDE3
This also may be relevant: http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/Ideas/11.1
Might one of these have been Larry Stotler's list? Whatever became of it? John Perry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Here it is, I should go through it too: http://en.opensuse.org/What_features_is_KDE4_missing_when_compared_to_KDE3
This also may be relevant: http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/Ideas/11.1
Thanks Dotan, I had already looked at both of those. Neither is really helpful. It looks like somebody started them and then the effort died. I think it is really important that a reasonably complete list exist for comparison and reference by users. The chance that anyone but developers will query bugzilla to try and find that information to make a quick check if their issue has already been submitted is in reality "Slim and None". I just seems strange that with the voluminous number of posts and intense user interest on the subject, that Novell doesn't maintain a list. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Monday 23 March 2009 09:29:48 am David C. Rankin wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Here it is, I should go through it too: http://en.opensuse.org/What_features_is_KDE4_missing_when_compared_to_KDE 3
This also may be relevant: http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/Ideas/11.1
Thanks Dotan,
I had already looked at both of those. Neither is really helpful. It looks like somebody started them and then the effort died. I think it is really important that a reasonably complete list exist for comparison and reference by users. The chance that anyone but developers will query bugzilla to try and find that information to make a quick check if their issue has already been submitted is in reality "Slim and None".
I just seems strange that with the voluminous number of posts and intense user interest on the subject, that Novell doesn't maintain a list.
It would be huge list. Take number of applications, each has few drop down menus, each part of the window can have its context menu. Some menu items call subroutines that open window and have its own share of functions. Then, there are services (demons) that have its own features. To me it appear as almost endless list that will be inaccurate before it is released version 0.1. Developers will not stop and wait for someone to write documentation. Although, somewhat different list would be good to have. List of applications and related documents, per version. This will be large enough and require quite a few people to keep up with changes. The example why versions are needed is HOWTO articles. Not many are applicable without tinkering. Then it would be good to have standard how to write documents. What topics have to be included and to what extent covered to consider it complete. For instance, basic, advanced, power usage and examples, library APIs, workflow diagrams, and so on. I guess that each developer would have to be followed by few guys writing different aspects of documentation. Do you have some examples of software that is good covered with documents that can be used as template for other projects? -- Regards, Rajko -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Rajko M. wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 09:29:48 am David C. Rankin wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Here it is, I should go through it too: http://en.opensuse.org/What_features_is_KDE4_missing_when_compared_to_KDE 3
This also may be relevant: http://en.opensuse.org/KDE/Ideas/11.1 Thanks Dotan,
I had already looked at both of those. Neither is really helpful. It looks like somebody started them and then the effort died. I think it is really important that a reasonably complete list exist for comparison and reference by users. The chance that anyone but developers will query bugzilla to try and find that information to make a quick check if their issue has already been submitted is in reality "Slim and None".
I just seems strange that with the voluminous number of posts and intense user interest on the subject, that Novell doesn't maintain a list.
It would be huge list.
participants (4)
-
David C. Rankin -
Dotan Cohen -
John E. Perry -
Rajko M.