I have lost X-display
I can no longer boot into X? I have done nothing that I can think of, expecially to the display. I get the following message: (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sat Jul 26 21:19:17 2003 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVdriver kernel module! (EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting *** (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. I am completely open to suggestions .... tks, -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
On Saturday 26 July 2003 10:30 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I can no longer boot into X? I have done nothing that I can think of, expecially to the display. I get the following message:
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sat Jul 26 21:19:17 2003 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVdriver kernel module! (EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting *** (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
I am completely open to suggestions ....
tks, -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
IIRC, a semi-recent update from YaST downloaded a kernel update for me, and gave a warning about having to reinstall the NVidia graphics drivers. I don't have this, so I disregarded the message. Have you recently run YOU? Did it install a kernel update?
* Michael Sacco
On Saturday 26 July 2003 10:30 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I can no longer boot into X? I have done nothing that I can think of, expecially to the display. I get the following message:
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sat Jul 26 21:19:17 2003 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVdriver kernel module! (EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting *** (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
I am completely open to suggestions ....
tks, -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
IIRC, a semi-recent update from YaST downloaded a kernel update for me, and gave a warning about having to reinstall the NVidia graphics drivers. I don't have this, so I disregarded the message. Have you recently run YOU? Did it install a kernel update?
I do not recall a kernel update and/or the warning about nVidia. I do not run YaST, I use fou4s regularly (cron). I ran yast from text mode (all I can get rite now) and configured the display/video card, but there were no changes. Should I remove XF86Config (rename) and start from there. tks, -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
* Patrick Shanahan
* Michael Sacco
[07-26-03 22:00]: On Saturday 26 July 2003 10:30 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I can no longer boot into X? I have done nothing that I can think of, expecially to the display. I get the following message:
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Sat Jul 26 21:19:17 2003 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVdriver kernel module! (EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting *** (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
I am completely open to suggestions ....
tks, -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
IIRC, a semi-recent update from YaST downloaded a kernel update for me, and gave a warning about having to reinstall the NVidia graphics drivers. I don't have this, so I disregarded the message. Have you recently run YOU? Did it install a kernel update?
I do not recall a kernel update and/or the warning about nVidia. I do not run YaST, I use fou4s regularly (cron).
I ran yast from text mode (all I can get rite now) and configured the display/video card, but there were no changes.
Should I remove XF86Config (rename) and start from there.
I also notice: Fatal server error: no screens found Why would 'no screens' happen? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 05:33, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I also notice: Fatal server error: no screens found
Why would 'no screens' happen?
Because it failed to initialise the driver. NVdriver is very old, exactly which version of nvidia's driver are you running. Automated updates are *not* a good thing. I'm guessing you got an old GLX driver but you still have the new kernel driver (named nvidia.o, not NVdriver)
* Anders Johansson
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 05:33, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I also notice: Fatal server error: no screens found
Why would 'no screens' happen?
Because it failed to initialise the driver.
NVdriver is very old, exactly which version of nvidia's driver are you running.
NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-3123 NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-3123 336520 Sep 16 2002 /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
Automated updates are *not* a good thing. I'm guessing you got an old GLX driver but you still have the new kernel driver (named nvidia.o, not NVdriver)
And to correct this (?? go to nVidia and get later driver ??). -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 05:55, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Anders Johansson
[07-26-03 22:47]: On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 05:33, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I also notice: Fatal server error: no screens found
Why would 'no screens' happen?
Because it failed to initialise the driver.
NVdriver is very old, exactly which version of nvidia's driver are you running.
NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-3123 NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-3123
hm, I don't remember when they switched names, but 3123 is pretty old.
336520 Sep 16 2002 /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
Automated updates are *not* a good thing. I'm guessing you got an old GLX driver but you still have the new kernel driver (named nvidia.o, not NVdriver)
And to correct this (?? go to nVidia and get later driver ??).
Either that, or if you want to keep your old driver, check why NVdriver won't load. perhaps "modprobe NVdriver" gives some interesting error messages. Perhaps you need to reinstall it. But I would go for the upgrade. The newer drivers are better
* Anders Johansson
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 05:55, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
336520 Sep 16 2002 /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
Automated updates are *not* a good thing. I'm guessing you got an old GLX driver but you still have the new kernel driver (named nvidia.o, not NVdriver)
And to correct this (?? go to nVidia and get later driver ??).
Either that, or if you want to keep your old driver, check why NVdriver won't load. perhaps "modprobe NVdriver" gives some interesting error messages. Perhaps you need to reinstall it.
But I would go for the upgrade. The newer drivers are better
Trying to download from nVidia now. Does SuSE have the drivers on their site. I am still running 8.1. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
* Patrick Shanahan
* Anders Johansson
[07-26-03 23:02]: On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 05:55, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
336520 Sep 16 2002 /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o
Automated updates are *not* a good thing. I'm guessing you got an old GLX driver but you still have the new kernel driver (named nvidia.o, not NVdriver)
And to correct this (?? go to nVidia and get later driver ??).
Either that, or if you want to keep your old driver, check why NVdriver won't load. perhaps "modprobe NVdriver" gives some interesting error messages. Perhaps you need to reinstall it.
But I would go for the upgrade. The newer drivers are better
Trying to download from nVidia now. Does SuSE have the drivers on their site. I am still running 8.1.
rpm --justdb -Uhv NVIDIA_kernel*.rpm
rpm -Uhv NVIDIA_GLX*.rpm
2) Kernel sources must be installed and configured. Usually this means
installing the 'kernel-source' RPM with YaST2 and configure it then
with the following commands:
cp /boot/vmlinuz.config /usr/src/linux/.config
cp /boot/vmlinuz.version.h /usr/src/linux/include/linux
cp /boot/vmlinuz.autoconf.h /usr/src/linux/include/linux
cd /usr/src/linux
make cloneconfig dep
NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4363.run --extract-only
cd NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4363/usr/src/nv
make install
depmod -a
5) Enable 3D support with SaX2.
No good feelings here. I still have the same error...:
wahoo:~ # SaX2
SaX: initializing please wait...
SaX: including [Card:0] profile: nvidia...
SaX: startup
xc: sorry could not start configuration server
xc: this could have the following reasons:
- the card is still not supported. To get
further information about the driver status
please have a look at:
http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/Status.html
- the card was not detected correctly. In
this case please get the information which
XFree86 module provide support for the card
and set the module using the following
command:
sax2 -m 0=<name of the module>
Note: 0 is a digit not a letter
Note: Information about modules are
provided on the mentioned WWW-Page
- the card was detected but the server fails
to start in spite of the detection. In this
case something more serious had happened.
Please have a look at the log file:
/var/log/SaX.log
xc: if you can not determine the cause
please get in contact with:
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 07:26, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
5) Enable 3D support with SaX2.
Never mind that stage, it's obviously already enabled. is NVdriver loaded from your earlier escapades? If so "rmmod NVdriver" Does "modprobe nvidia" give you any errors? If you can get the module "nvidia" loaded, try startx
* Anders Johansson
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 07:26, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
5) Enable 3D support with SaX2.
Never mind that stage, it's obviously already enabled.
is NVdriver loaded from your earlier escapades? If so "rmmod NVdriver"
not loaded
Does "modprobe nvidia" give you any errors?
wahoo:~ # modprobe nvidia Warning: loading /lib/modules/2.4.19-4GB/kernel/drivers/video/nvidia.o will taint the kernel: non-GPL license - NVIDIA See http://www.tux.org/lkml/#export-tainted for information about tainted modules Module nvidia loaded, with warnings
If you can get the module "nvidia" loaded, try startx
XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0" after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining. tks, -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 07:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0" after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
Is that the only error message you get? If so, then I'm out of ideas
* Anders Johansson
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 07:59, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0" after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
Is that the only error message you get? If so, then I'm out of ideas
Yes, but.... I did modprobe nvidia and it took w/o an error. Did init 5
and X is back
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 08:45, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
Did init 3, sax2, and still have same error, quoted above.
weird
Question, should I be doing sux - before sax2 ??
No, sux is for when you are already in X. When you log in to X, or start it, an authentication cookie is generated, and any program that wants to talk to the X server needs to have access to that cookie (unless you turn of authentication with xhost). The purpose of sux is to transfer that X authentication cookie to the other user.
Just hit me in the face.
You're too far away :)
participants (3)
-
Anders Johansson
-
Michael Sacco
-
Patrick Shanahan