ok to remove nullOK?
Probably it is ok to remove nullOK? Is it just the thing that allows users to register without a password? what is
use_authto k
in your file Kastus? a typo or error mine doesn't have that... actually on the redhat i used bastille which made these changes don't think I have that option here so was trying to do more or less the same thing manually... Susan
#%PAM-1.0 auth requisite pam_unix.so nullok #set_secrpc auth required pam_securetty.so auth required pam_nologin.so #auth required pam_homecheck.so auth required pam_env.so auth required pam_mail.so account required pam_unix.so password required pam_pwcheck.so nullok password required pam_unix.so nullok use_first_pass use_authto k session required pam_unix.so none # debug or trace session required pam_limits.so
That might explain why your changes are ignored.
Regards, -Kastus
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 09:25:34PM -0400, Susan Buczak wrote:
Probably it is ok to remove nullOK? Is it just the thing that allows users to register without a password?
It is the thing that allows the users to use accounts without passwords.
what is
use_authto k
I apologize for incorrect linewrapping. The line should read: password required pam_unix.so nullok use_first_pass use_authtok use_authtok is used to force the module to not prompt the user for a new password but use the one provided by the previously stacked password module. Regards, -Kastus
participants (2)
-
Konstantin (Kastus) Shchuka
-
Susan Buczak