What's up with all Sendmail less secure excuse. Yes! Sendmail as had issues in the past but apart from an issues few month's back it's as being pretty secure. Postfix approch is lot better but it's had issues to. I have had securtiy issue with Sendmail or Postfix ever and the years i have being using it. Regards, Alex
* lm72 LinuxNews.DynDns.org Admin (suse@linuxnews.dyndns.org) [011216 20:21]: ->What's up with all Sendmail less secure excuse. ->Yes! Sendmail as had issues in the past but apart from an issues few ->month's back it's as being pretty secure. ->Postfix approch is lot better but it's had issues to. -> ->I have had securtiy issue with Sendmail or Postfix ever and the years i ->have being using it. Alex, This whole debate boils down to the same thing as EMACS vs. VI, which shell do you like..etc..etc..etc. It's a preferences thing..some people prefer Pine and scream about how hard Mutt is too use. It's all crap...and after a while it's just taken with a grain of salt. When I ask these questions I usually ask what people like and why they like it. I don't pay attention to 80% of what they reply with because it's personal bias crap. Same ole same ole. ;) -----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====----- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org -----=====-----=====-----=====-----=====----- I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message...
participants (2)
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
lm72 LinuxNews.DynDns.org Admin