Today at 7:49am, Jerry Feldman wrote:

On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:27:13 -0700 Kastus wrote:

...

I've just noticed that ps reports start time of the process in the future:

pike@fizia:~> ps u USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND pike 7294 0.0 0.3 4068 1748 pts/0 Ss 18:12 0:00 -bash pike 15111 0.0 0.1 2148 672 pts/0 R+ 18:29 0:00 ps u pike@fizia:~> date Fri Aug 6 18:21:25 PDT 2004

This happens on two installations of 9.1 with kernel 2.6.5-7.95-default

Anybody else observed that? Interesting. I'm running 2.6.5-7.104 and the start times are correct. gaf@lap1800:~> ps u;date USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND gaf 3236 0.0 0.5 3972 1732 pts/1 Ss 07:46 0:00 -bash gaf 3297 0.0 0.5 3980 1724 pts/2 Ss+ 07:47 0:00 /bin/bash gaf 3526 0.0 0.2 2164 688 pts/1 R+ 07:49 0:00 ps u Sat Aug 7 07:49:29 EDT 2004

Yes, interesting. I also am running 2.6.5-7.95 and see a discrepancy, but not as large as yours. The difference also changes at various seconds within a minute: jlc:~ # ps u ; date USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 17629 0.0 0.3 2696 1672 pts/1 S Aug06 0:00 -bash root 19717 0.0 0.1 2164 688 pts/1 R+ 07:58 0:00 ps u Sat Aug 7 07:57:31 PDT 2004 jlc:~ # ps u ; date USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 17629 0.0 0.3 2696 1672 pts/1 S Aug06 0:00 -bash root 19719 0.0 0.1 2164 688 pts/1 R+ 07:59 0:00 ps u Sat Aug 7 07:58:03 PDT 2004 jlc:~ # ps u ; date USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 17629 0.0 0.3 2696 1672 pts/1 S Aug06 0:00 -bash root 19725 0.0 0.1 2164 688 pts/1 R+ 07:59 0:00 ps u Sat Aug 7 07:58:19 PDT 2004 jlc:~ # ps u ; date USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 17629 0.0 0.3 2696 1672 pts/1 S Aug06 0:00 -bash root 19731 0.0 0.1 2164 688 pts/1 R+ 07:59 0:00 ps u Sat Aug 7 07:58:32 PDT 2004 jlc:~ # ps u ; date USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 17629 0.0 0.3 2696 1672 pts/1 S Aug06 0:00 -bash root 19736 0.0 0.1 2164 688 pts/1 R+ 08:00 0:00 ps u Sat Aug 7 07:58:56 PDT 2004 jlc:~ # ps u ; date USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 17629 0.0 0.3 2696 1672 pts/1 S Aug06 0:00 -bash root 19740 0.0 0.1 2164 688 pts/1 R+ 08:00 0:00 ps u Sat Aug 7 07:59:01 PDT 2004 jlc:~ # uname -a Linux jlc 2.6.5-7.95-default #1 Thu Jul 1 15:23:45 UTC 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux Jim

Is it possible to use NetZero with SuSE 9.1? I know the free version of NetZero has an application that (only?) runs on Mac, Windows, and Lindows .. But if you have a paid NetZero account, is there a way to rig it with SuSE 9.1? Thanks!

On Saturday 07 August 2004 16:21, Richard Atcheson wrote:

On Saturday 07 August 2004 02:42 pm, dreadnought wrote:

...

Is it possible to use NetZero with SuSE 9.1? I know the free version of NetZero has an application that (only?) runs on Mac, Windows, and Lindows .. But if you have a paid NetZero account, is there a way to rig it with SuSE 9.1?

Once upon a time when it was free and I was traveling I simply used kppp to dial in to Netzero. Dont know why you still couldnt do it unless you want to use their compression to make you think you're downloading faster than you are. ra I wonder if NetZero supports ISDN. Can't get cable in my locale. <pout> -- ...CH "Home is the place you can scratch where it itches."

net zero i am not sure about but I googled and found that Juno now supports pop3 and smtp and I found the relavant dns entrys. so try it. They claim now not to support pop3 on some links but I just used it yesterday. Though I do use another isp for dialup and setup a separate user to handle juno. http://www.juno.com/support/email/email-setup.html -- _______ _______ _______ __ / ____\ \ / / ____|_ _\ \ / / | | \ \ /\ / / (___ | | \ \ / / | | \ \/ \/ / \___ \ | | \ \/ / | |____ \ /\ / ____) |_| |_ \ / \_____| \/ \/ |_____/|_____| \/