I was unaware that RH had an S/390 port.. I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as countries. SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a year..yet these stock exchanges are going to be running RH. This is just sad..doing the work and then politics and branding get you screwed... :/ http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=540849 Good for Linux in General, but again the spotlight moves from the truely innovative Linux hackers to the marketing experts. Tis sad. -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org cat CE|ME|NT|XP > /dev/null
Well, that's the nature of the GPL. Anyone can redistribute your code under their own label. But if SuSE did the work, it's only fair to assume they're a lot more competent, and are going to make a killing at the services needed to maintain the systems. BTW. Someone I talked to at IBM said that SuSE on 390 wasn't very good. They preferred TurboLinux or Caldera. Has anyone here actually used 'zSeries' with linux, and can comment? Anders On Thursday 30 August 2001 23.10, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
I was unaware that RH had an S/390 port..
I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as countries. SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a year..yet these stock exchanges are going to be running RH. This is just sad..doing the work and then politics and branding get you screwed... :/
http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=540849
Good for Linux in General, but again the spotlight moves from the truely innovative Linux hackers to the marketing experts. Tis sad.
* Anders Johansson (andjoh@cicada.linux-site.net) [010830 14:21]: ->Well, that's the nature of the GPL. Anyone can redistribute your code under ->their own label. Agreed. But this is a branding issue. IBM, Compaq and the rest have always maintained they would push SuSE in Europe, RH in the U.S. and TurboLinux in Asia... ->But if SuSE did the work, it's only fair to assume they're a lot more ->competent, and are going to make a killing at the services needed to maintain ->the systems. Yes..but how can one make a killing in PS if your software isn't what's installed? Should SuSE ever want to do PS in the states they should support RH? This makes no sense. It keeps their PS efforts to Europe. ->BTW. Someone I talked to at IBM said that SuSE on 390 wasn't very good. They ->preferred TurboLinux or Caldera. Has anyone here actually used 'zSeries' with ->linux, and can comment? Sounds like personal bias of the person at IBM you talk to...it's the same code. -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org cat CE|ME|NT|XP > /dev/null
On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:14 pm, Anders Johansson wrote:
Well, that's the nature of the GPL. Anyone can redistribute your code under their own label.
But if SuSE did the work, it's only fair to assume they're a lot more competent, and are going to make a killing at the services needed to maintain the systems.
BTW. Someone I talked to at IBM said that SuSE on 390 wasn't very good. They preferred TurboLinux or Caldera. Has anyone here actually used 'zSeries' with linux, and can comment?
I didn't know that Caldera had a port for the S/390....... +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall bmarsh@bmarsh.com Bellaire, MI 08/30/01 17:35 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "A bachelor is a selfish, undeserving guy who has cheated some woman out of a divorce."
On Thursday 30 August 2001 23.35, Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:14 pm, Anders Johansson wrote:
Well, that's the nature of the GPL. Anyone can redistribute your code under their own label.
But if SuSE did the work, it's only fair to assume they're a lot more competent, and are going to make a killing at the services needed to maintain the systems.
BTW. Someone I talked to at IBM said that SuSE on 390 wasn't very good. They preferred TurboLinux or Caldera. Has anyone here actually used 'zSeries' with linux, and can comment?
I didn't know that Caldera had a port for the S/390.......
I honestly don't know. I've never worked with linux/390 myself. btw, while searching for info on the subject, I came across this on the IBM s390 pages http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/os/linux/dist.html It seems IBM doesn't mention RedHat/390 either. A bit odd, if they're doing Big Business with them. Anders
On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:10 pm, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
I was unaware that RH had an S/390 port..
I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as countries. SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a year..yet these stock exchanges are going to be running RH. This is just sad..doing the work and then politics and branding get you screwed... :/
http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=540849
Good for Linux in General, but again the spotlight moves from the truely innovative Linux hackers to the marketing experts. Tis sad.
I guess I missed the part where it says "SuSE will no longer be providing an S/390 port." -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall bmarsh@bmarsh.com Bellaire, MI 08/30/01 17:32 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "What this country needs is a dime that will buy a good five-cent bagel."
* Bruce Marshall (bmarsh@bmarsh.com) [010830 14:35]: ->On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:10 pm, Ben Rosenberg wrote: ->> I was unaware that RH had an S/390 port.. ->> ->> I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as countries. ->> SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a year..yet these stock ->> exchanges are going to be running RH. This is just sad..doing the work ->> and then politics and branding get you screwed... :/ ->> ->> http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=540849 ->> ->> Good for Linux in General, but again the spotlight moves from the truely ->> innovative Linux hackers to the marketing experts. Tis sad. -> ->I guess I missed the part where it says "SuSE will no longer be providing an ->S/390 port." I think you missed the point. I am talking about SuSE on S/390 being used in the States ..not that they will roll over and let RH have it worldwide and just top work on S/390. Where did you get that I said anything remotely close to that. I see nothing in any statement about that. Look again at the previous mails and see what I was talking about. -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org cat CE|ME|NT|XP > /dev/null
On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:38 pm, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
* Bruce Marshall (bmarsh@bmarsh.com) [010830 14:35]: ->On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:10 pm, Ben Rosenberg wrote: ->> I was unaware that RH had an S/390 port.. ->> ->> I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as countries. ->> SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a year..yet these stock ->> exchanges are going to be running RH. This is just sad..doing the work ->> and then politics and branding get you screwed... :/ ->> ->> http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=540849 ->> ->> Good for Linux in General, but again the spotlight moves from the truely ->> innovative Linux hackers to the marketing experts. Tis sad. -> ->I guess I missed the part where it says "SuSE will no longer be providing an ->S/390 port."
I think you missed the point. I am talking about SuSE on S/390 being used in the States ..not that they will roll over and let RH have it worldwide and just top work on S/390. Where did you get that I said anything remotely close to that. I see nothing in any statement about that. Look again at the previous mails and see what I was talking about.
I *read* your post..... But I don't see the gloom and doom in the news that you do I guess. *I'm* running SuSE on a S/390. That's all that counts to me...... :o) -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall bmarsh@bmarsh.com Bellaire, MI 08/30/01 17:53 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "If you want to see a short summer, borrow some money due in the fall."
On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:38 pm, Ben Rosenberg wrote: I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as
countries. ->> SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a year..yet these stock ->> exchanges are going to be running RH. This is just sad..doing the work ->> and then politics and branding get you screwed... :/ ->> http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=540849 Good for Linux in General, but again the spotlight moves from
the truely innovative Linux hackers to the marketing experts. \************************ On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:54 pm, Bruce Marshall, you wrote:
I *read* your post..... But I don't see the gloom and doom in the news that you do I guess.
*I'm* running SuSE on a S/390. That's all that counts to me...... :o)
I must agree with Bruce as well, the article only shows the strength Linux in general is gaining. From the information I have gathered, IBM is only considering SuSE & TurboLinux for the 390s and other servers. I believe this will include stateside as well as Euopean areas. There have been no mentions of RH in the articles I have read or found yet. end of line Tracer -- ---KMail 1.3--- SuSE Linux v7.2--- Registered Linux User #225206
* Tracer Bullet (tracerb@sprintmail.com) [010830 17:26]: -> ->> On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:38 pm, Ben Rosenberg wrote: ->> I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as ->> > countries. ->> SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a ->> > year..yet these stock ->> exchanges are going to be running RH. ->> > This is just sad..doing the work ->> and then politics and ->> > branding get you screwed... :/ ->> -> http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=540849 ->Good for Linux in General, but again the spotlight moves from -> the truely innovative Linux hackers to the marketing experts. ->\************************ ->On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:54 pm, Bruce Marshall, you wrote: ->> I *read* your post..... But I don't see the gloom and doom in ->> the news that you do I guess. ->> ->> *I'm* running SuSE on a S/390. That's all that counts to me...... ->> :o) ->------------------------- ->I must agree with Bruce as well, the article only shows the strength ->Linux in general is gaining. From the information I have gathered, ->IBM is only considering SuSE & TurboLinux for the 390s and other ->servers. I believe this will include stateside as well as Euopean ->areas. There have been no mentions of RH in the articles I have read ->or found yet. -> ->end of line ->Tracer Go to www.infoworld.com and read the article. It states the S/390 will be running a version of Linux by RH. My comment wasn't that SuSE would stop doing S/390 or anything else. It was this tendency for companies such as IBM to push certain distributions in certain countries. I know this because Compaq's head of their newly formed Linux division back in Febuary told me that they target distributions to different regions..RH=U.S. SuSE=Europe and Turbo=Asia. I wouldn't make it up..this is how they said they plan on doing business...it's not set in concrete...they offer SuSE and RH on their site for laptops, workstations and servers..but he said that's how their reps would push if given the chance. I think SuSE will be around for a long time and I really want them around for a long time. I still use the software..I still push the software. I work now at XO Communications and until I started there Linux was banned from the desktop because of a break in 3 years ago...well, now 13 out of 30 developers run it on their desktop and have wiped NT4 off their PeeCee's.. heh. So this "Doom and Gloom" stuff is a load...otherwise why would I have been on this list for the last 3 years and continued to be after I was layed off by SuSE. -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org cat CE|ME|NT|XP > /dev/null
On Thursday 30 August 2001 05:10 pm, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
I was unaware that RH had an S/390 port..
I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as countries. SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a year..yet these stock exchanges are going to be running RH. This is just sad..doing the work and then politics and branding get you screwed... :/
http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=540849
Good for Linux in General, but again the spotlight moves from the truely innovative Linux hackers to the marketing experts. Tis sad.
This is just one installation, not the whole S/390 world. I hang out on the Linux-390 e-mail discussion list (the one at Marist College), and it seems to me that SuSE has a commanding market share among the mainframe Linux community. Just my anecdotal experience; I haven't conducted a formal survey or anything like that. But SuSE is mentioned much more often than RH on that list, IMO. Scott -- ------------------------------------------------------------ "I don't mind Microsoft making money. I mind them having a bad operating system." -- Linus Torvalds, in the NY Times Scott Courtney http://www.4th.com/
Ben Rosenberg wrote:
I was unaware that RH had an S/390 port..
I guess SuSE is still letting politics rule the day as far as countries. SuSE's S/390 port has been proven for over a year..yet these stock exchanges are going to be running RH. This is just sad..doing the work and then politics and branding get you screwed... :/
We received a correction from IBM, and they said it's journalist error, and that the Linux is SuSE Linux. RH is still beta.
participants (6)
-
Anders Johansson
-
Ben Rosenberg
-
Bruce Marshall
-
Michael Hasenstein
-
Scott Courtney
-
Tracer Bullet