[S.u.S.E. Linux] Bounced Message to Jean-Michel_Dossogne@f7111.surf.be
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6a432318872e6bf621651f647bc6647a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
surf.be bounced a message back to suse-linux-e@suse.com
Reason: Unable to transport message to 101:320/7111
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start of original message follows below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received: by surf.be (WtrGate+ v0.93.p5 sn 147)
via SMTP; Tue, 05 May 98 16:15:00 GMT+0200
for jeanmichel.dossogne@surf.be
Received: from sun1.iihe.ac.be - 193.190.247.71 by surf.be with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1774.114.11);
Tue, 5 May 1998 16:13:46 +0200
Received: from Goldengate.suse.com by sun1.iihe.ac.be with SMTP (PP);
Tue, 5 May 1998 16:14:59 +0100
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by Goldengate.suse.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA01935;
Tue, 5 May 1998 07:01:14 -0700
Received: by Goldengate.suse.com (bulk_mailer v1.5);
Tue, 5 May 1998 07:01:14 -0700
Received: (from mdom@localhost) by Goldengate.suse.com (8.8.8/8.8.8)
id HAA01931 for suse-linux-e-outgoing; Tue, 5 May 1998 07:01:13 -0700
Received: from Galois.suse.de (Zuse.suse.de [195.125.217.2])
by Goldengate.suse.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA01911
for
I am about to buy a new system. I have offers for a AMD K6 System, but = I remember some troubles with either K5 or K6 CPU's. (discussed on one of the SuSE lists) Some applications crashed, the solution was to compile the Kernel either as a 386 or 486. =20 Now, I like some information about this phenomen, since there is a huge price difference between Intel and AMD. =20 I had a look into the SBD, but could not find any clue.
Should be ok with 2.0.33. See the announcement from Linus below...
J=FCrgen
*** truncated rest of message *** -- To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
participants (1)
-
postmaster@surf.be