Dear developers, I heard 10.1 will contain X.org 6.9, but seeing as 7.0 is going to be the branch for future updates, why did we not choose to use 7.0? Fedora Core 5 uses 7.0 so that's a proof-of-possibility, right? -- Tux #395953 resides at http://samvit.org playing with KDE 3.52 on SUSE Linux 10.0 $ date [] CCE +2006-04-07 W14-5 UTC+0530
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:44:14PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Dear developers,
I heard 10.1 will contain X.org 6.9, but seeing as 7.0 is going to be the branch for future updates, why did we not choose to use 7.0? Fedora Core 5 uses 7.0 so that's a proof-of-possibility, right?
The difference from 6.9 to 7.0 is only the way of packaging. It does not make a big difference whether this move is done between 10.0 and 10.1 or between 10.1 and 10.2. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Robert Schiele
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:44:14PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Dear developers,
I heard 10.1 will contain X.org 6.9, but seeing as 7.0 is going to be the branch for future updates, why did we not choose to use 7.0? Fedora Core 5 uses 7.0 so that's a proof-of-possibility, right?
The difference from 6.9 to 7.0 is only the way of packaging. It does not make a big difference whether this move is done between 10.0 and 10.1 or between 10.1 and 10.2.
Code wise it's the same - but it is indeed separate packages and AFAIK no more /usr/X11R6 anymore. So, this needs changes to other packages and since for the user there's no visible change in running the apps, we decide to upgrade after 10.1 is out, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:44:14PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Dear developers,
I heard 10.1 will contain X.org 6.9, but seeing as 7.0 is going to be the branch for future updates, why did we not choose to use 7.0? Fedora Core 5 uses 7.0 so that's a proof-of-possibility, right?
Because we had feature freeze in January ;) Ciao, Marcus
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:46:06PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:44:14PM +0530, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Dear developers,
I heard 10.1 will contain X.org 6.9, but seeing as 7.0 is going to be the branch for future updates, why did we not choose to use 7.0? Fedora Core 5 uses 7.0 so that's a proof-of-possibility, right?
Because we had feature freeze in January ;)
Which is why there were no new features added to YaST since January. <ducks> houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, houghi wrote:
I heard 10.1 will contain X.org 6.9, but seeing as 7.0 is going to be the branch for future updates, why did we not choose to use 7.0? Fedora Core 5 uses 7.0 so that's a proof-of-possibility, right?
Because we had feature freeze in January ;)
Which is why there were no new features added to YaST since January.
Hey, we only did the usual bugfixing ;) Regards Christoph
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:58:54PM +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, houghi wrote:
I heard 10.1 will contain X.org 6.9, but seeing as 7.0 is going to be the branch for future updates, why did we not choose to use 7.0? Fedora Core 5 uses 7.0 so that's a proof-of-possibility, right?
Because we had feature freeze in January ;)
Which is why there were no new features added to YaST since January.
Hey, we only did the usual bugfixing ;)
That's a bug, not a feature. :-D houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
participants (6)
-
Andreas Jaeger -
Christoph Thiel -
houghi -
Marcus Meissner -
Robert Schiele -
Shriramana Sharma