Hello suse-linux-e! I am thinking about buy this mainboard and CPU: AMD Athlon XP 3000+ 64bit. soc.939 MB Microstar K8N nWidia nForce NF3 I am not sure if still SuSE 9.2 is not able to support south brigde of this board. I was trying to build similar computer in October 2005 and I had to change to board who support AMD processor with socket 754, because network adapter didn't work and as I remember that USB had problems too. Maybe you take me question, that why I don't want SuSE 10.0, but the reason is, that I have got very bad experiences with running Kylix 3 Pro on Linux kernel 2.6.11=>. On 9.2 it works. I woun't buy it if it won't work corretly for me. -- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk
Hello suse-linux-e!
I am thinking about buy this mainboard and CPU:
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ 64bit. soc.939 MB Microstar K8N nWidia nForce NF3
I am not sure if still SuSE 9.2 is not able to support south brigde of this board. I was trying to build similar computer in October 2005 and I had to change to board who support AMD processor with socket 754, because network adapter didn't work and as I remember that USB had problems too.
Maybe you take me question, that why I don't want SuSE 10.0, but the reason is, that I have got very bad experiences with running Kylix 3 Pro on Linux kernel 2.6.11=>. On 9.2 it works.
I woun't buy it if it won't work corretly for me.
-- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk ============ Roland I'm thinking you should look at a motherboard with the nForce 4 chipset rather than the 3. Seems to me there were several problems regarding
On Thursday 02 February 2006 06:27, Roland Turcan wrote: the 3, which wasn't around long before nVidia came out with the 4, which is much better. Better supported, more reliable. Anyway, why settle for outdated when you can get the newer? Someone must be closing out some old hardware. regards, Lee
<<< 2.2.2006 20:43 - BandiPat "penguin0601@earthlink.net" >>> B> On Thursday 02 February 2006 06:27, Roland Turcan wrote:
Hello suse-linux-e!
I am thinking about buy this mainboard and CPU:
AMD Athlon XP 3000+ 64bit. soc.939 MB Microstar K8N nWidia nForce NF3
I am not sure if still SuSE 9.2 is not able to support south brigde of this board. I was trying to build similar computer in October 2005 and I had to change to board who support AMD processor with socket 754, because network adapter didn't work and as I remember that USB had problems too.
Maybe you take me question, that why I don't want SuSE 10.0, but the reason is, that I have got very bad experiences with running Kylix 3 Pro on Linux kernel 2.6.11=>. On 9.2 it works.
I woun't buy it if it won't work corretly for me.
-- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk B> ============ B> Roland B> I'm thinking you should look at a motherboard with the nForce 4 chipset B> rather than the 3. Seems to me there were several problems regarding B> the 3, which wasn't around long before nVidia came out with the 4, B> which is much better. Better supported, more reliable. Anyway, why B> settle for outdated when you can get the newer? Someone must be B> closing out some old hardware.
OK, thank you for your reply, but I am still not sure, that SuSE 9.2 will work correctly. I really like SuSE 10.0, that is very nice work, but I cannot get any support for "unsupported linux distributions" from Borland and need to know that SuSE 9.2 will work, because Kylix doesn't work on newer kernels. As I said (wrote). I have installed on my actual PC SuSE 9.2 for developing, SuSE 10.0, Mandriva 2006, Ubuntu 5.1, Knoppix 4 for testing. -- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:49:16 +0100, Roland Turcan wrote:
OK, thank you for your reply, but I am still not sure, that SuSE 9.2 will work correctly.
The 9.2 kernel will have problems with nforce4 based boards, but it will probably also have problems with nforce3 based boards. And you should keep in mind that maintenance for 9.2 will end in approximately half a year (if I've calculated correctly). Philipp
<<< 3.2.2006 12:50 - Philipp Thomas "philipp.thomas@t-link.de" >>> PT> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:49:16 +0100, Roland Turcan wrote:
OK, thank you for your reply, but I am still not sure, that SuSE 9.2 will work correctly.
PT> The 9.2 kernel will have problems with nforce4 based boards, but it will PT> probably also have problems with nforce3 based boards. And you should PT> keep in mind that maintenance for 9.2 will end in approximately half a PT> year (if I've calculated correctly). Then I have this offer to buy this mainboards: MB MS,So939,ATI Xpress200,4DDR,SATA(R), LAN,VGA,1394,mATX MB MS, So939, NF6150/410, GBe, FireWire MB FOX, So939, SIS6100+nF410,DDR, VGA,LAN,SATAII(R) MB MS, So939, NF6150/430, GBe, FireWire Which will work on SuSE 9.2? I need to buy 64bit, because our customers have problems on 64bits and we are not able to test, because we don't have 64bit machine. Or could you recommend me any other mainboard which will be good for SuSE 9.2? -- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk
Philipp Thomas said:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:49:16 +0100, Roland Turcan wrote:
OK, thank you for your reply, but I am still not sure, that SuSE 9.2 will work correctly.
The 9.2 kernel will have problems with nforce4 based boards, but it will probably also have problems with nforce3 based boards. And you should keep in mind that maintenance for 9.2 will end in approximately half a year (if I've calculated correctly).
I can recommend the Abit KN8 motherboard, I just took delivery of one yesterday along with an Athlon X2 4200 CPU. I was a bit concerned that there may be problem but on a quick test with 10.0 and all the hardware was discovered correctly and it just worked. OK I am runnign 10.0 but as Philipp says support for 9.2 is almost running out. Support for X86_64 is now very stable. -- David Bottrill david@bottrill.org www.bottrill.org Registered Linux user number 330730 Internet Free World Dialup: 683864
<<< 3.2.2006 14:53 - David Bottrill "david@bottrill.org" >>> DB> Philipp says support for 9.2 is almost running out. Support for X86_64 is DB> now very stable. Thanks David, but I as said many times, the most important and the only reason for SuSE 9.2 is Kylix 3. What shall I do now? -- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk
On Thursday 02 February 2006 7:39 pm, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:49:16 +0100, Roland Turcan wrote:
OK, thank you for your reply, but I am still not sure, that SuSE 9.2 will work correctly.
The 9.2 kernel will have problems with nforce4 based boards, but it will probably also have problems with nforce3 based boards. And you should keep in mind that maintenance for 9.2 will end in approximately half a year (if I've calculated correctly).
Philipp
9.0 support ended last week. 9.1 support is dicontinued at the end of June 2006 so I'm guessing that 9.2 support is dicontinued at the end of December 2006 or January 2007 time frame. Stan
On Friday 03 February 2006 10:09, S Glasoe wrote:
On Thursday 02 February 2006 7:39 pm, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:49:16 +0100, Roland Turcan wrote:
OK, thank you for your reply, but I am still not sure, that SuSE 9.2 will work correctly.
The 9.2 kernel will have problems with nforce4 based boards, but it will probably also have problems with nforce3 based boards. And you should keep in mind that maintenance for 9.2 will end in approximately half a year (if I've calculated correctly).
Philipp
9.0 support ended last week. 9.1 support is dicontinued at the end of June 2006 so I'm guessing that 9.2 support is dicontinued at the end of December 2006 or January 2007 time frame.
Stan ========= So for the OP, the question still remains. What does he do about Kylix and running it under 10.0 or is there a replacement for it, so he can work with his customers?
Quote: RT>but I as said many times, the most important and the only reason for RT>SuSE 9.2 is Kylix 3. RT>Which will work on SuSE 9.2? RT>I need to buy 64bit, because our customers have problems on 64bits RT>and we are not able to test, because we don't have 64bit machine. RT>Or could you recommend me any other mainboard which will be good for RT>SuSE 9.2? ---------- That seems to be the main question, that he hasn't asked, concerning the new motherboard. Lee
On Friday 03 February 2006 08:54, Roland Turcan wrote:
<<< 3.2.2006 14:53 - David Bottrill "david@bottrill.org" >>> DB> Philipp says support for 9.2 is almost running out. Support for X86_64 is DB> now very stable.
Thanks David,
but I as said many times, the most important and the only reason for SuSE 9.2 is Kylix 3.
What shall I do now?
I ran 9.2 on an MSI K8T Neo2 Series MB with an AMD 64 bit processor for over a year with absolutely no problems. Bob S.
<<< 4.2.2006 9:39 - Bob S "usr@sanctum.com" >>> BS> On Friday 03 February 2006 08:54, Roland Turcan wrote:
<<< 3.2.2006 14:53 - David Bottrill "david@bottrill.org" >>> DB> Philipp says support for 9.2 is almost running out. Support for X86_64 is DB> now very stable.
Thanks David,
but I as said many times, the most important and the only reason for SuSE 9.2 is Kylix 3.
What shall I do now?
BS> I ran 9.2 on an MSI K8T Neo2 Series MB with an AMD 64 bit processor for over a BS> year with absolutely no problems.
Have you built kernel, or it is running on default installation + patches. Thanks. -- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk
<<< 4.2.2006 9:44 - Bob S "usr@sanctum.com" >>> BS> I ran 9.2 on an MSI K8T Neo2 Series MB with an AMD 64 bit processor for over a BS> year with absolutely no problems. Second question: Which kind of socket was there? -- Best regards, TRoland http://www.rotursoft.sk http://exekutor.rotursoft.sk
On Saturday 04 February 2006 03:42, Roland Turcan wrote:
<<< 4.2.2006 9:39 - Bob S "usr@sanctum.com" >>>
BS> On Friday 03 February 2006 08:54, Roland Turcan wrote:
<<< 3.2.2006 14:53 - David Bottrill "david@bottrill.org" >>> DB> Philipp says support for 9.2 is almost running out. Support for X86_64 is DB> now very stable.
Thanks David,
but I as said many times, the most important and the only reason for SuSE 9.2 is Kylix 3.
What shall I do now?
BS> I ran 9.2 on an MSI K8T Neo2 Series MB with an AMD 64 bit processor for over a year with absolutely no problems.
Have you built kernel, or it is running on default installation + patches.
To both questions: Standard regular default SuSE kernels. Default install and later upgraded with YOU. That board uses the 939 pin socket. I am running 10.0 on it now. Bob S.
participants (6)
-
BandiPat -
Bob S -
David Bottrill -
Philipp Thomas -
Roland Turcan -
S Glasoe