[opensuse] Freshclam: ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity
Hi, since a couple of hours, freshclam constantly fails with "ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity" after downloading main.cvd, no matter from which mirror it downloads the data. It also complains about clamd being outdate (0.97.8 vs. 0.98.1). Is it possible that there was a database format change from 0.97 to 0.98 which Suse missed? -S -- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
On 01/30/2014 03:13 PM, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
Hi,
since a couple of hours, freshclam constantly fails with "ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity" after downloading main.cvd, no matter from which mirror it downloads the data.
It also complains about clamd being outdate (0.97.8 vs. 0.98.1).
Is it possible that there was a database format change from 0.97 to 0.98 which Suse missed?
- my oS 13.1 tumbleweed says : # freshclam ClamAV update process started at Thu Jan 30 15:52:03 2014 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.98 Recommended version: 0.98.1 DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq main.cld is up to date (version: 55, sigs: 2424225, f-level: 60, builder: neo) daily.cld is up to date (version: 18415, sigs: 677003, f-level: 63, builder: neo) bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 235, sigs: 44, f-level: 63, builder: dgoddard) ............. regards -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 01/30/2014 03:13 PM, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
Hi,
since a couple of hours, freshclam constantly fails with "ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity" after downloading main.cvd, no matter from which mirror it downloads the data.
It also complains about clamd being outdate (0.97.8 vs. 0.98.1).
Is it possible that there was a database format change from 0.97 to 0.98 which Suse missed?
Freshclam actually has a debug function and THAT is interesting...: Downloading main.cvd [100%] LibClamAV debug: Initialized 0.97.8 engine LibClamAV debug: in cli_cvdload() LibClamAV debug: MD5(.tar.gz) = 020a61eea72868db83e891f27b116c26 LibClamAV debug: cli_cvdverify: MD5 verification error LibClamAV debug: Cleaning up phishcheck LibClamAV debug: Phishcheck cleaned up ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity So suddenly the MD5 check fails...? -- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 01/30/2014 03:13 PM, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
Hi,
since a couple of hours, freshclam constantly fails with "ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity" after downloading main.cvd, no matter from which mirror it downloads the data.
It also complains about clamd being outdate (0.97.8 vs. 0.98.1).
Is it possible that there was a database format change from 0.97 to 0.98 which Suse missed?
-S
It seems, somebody forgot to update the packages for 12.3...! 13.1 has 0.98. -S -- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
On 1/30/2014 8:10 AM, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
On 01/30/2014 03:13 PM, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
Hi,
since a couple of hours, freshclam constantly fails with "ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity" after downloading main.cvd, no matter from which mirror it downloads the data.
It also complains about clamd being outdate (0.97.8 vs. 0.98.1).
Is it possible that there was a database format change from 0.97 to 0.98 which Suse missed?
-S
It seems, somebody forgot to update the packages for 12.3...! 13.1 has 0.98.
-S
That's not terribly unusual. Saw the same thing on Ubuntu the other day. -- _____________________________________ ---This space for rent--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Hi Stefan, On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 06:10:58PM +0200, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
On 01/30/2014 03:13 PM, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
since a couple of hours, freshclam constantly fails with "ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity" after downloading main.cvd, no matter from which mirror it downloads the data.
It also complains about clamd being outdate (0.97.8 vs. 0.98.1).
Is it possible that there was a database format change from 0.97 to 0.98 which Suse missed?
It seems, somebody forgot to update the packages for 12.3...! 13.1 has 0.98.
Please file a bug report and send a link to it back to this thread. osc maintainer clamav -e tells you the bug owner. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On 01/30/2014 10:57 PM, Lars Müller wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 06:10:58PM +0200, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
On 01/30/2014 03:13 PM, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
since a couple of hours, freshclam constantly fails with "ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity" after downloading main.cvd, no matter from which mirror it downloads the data.
It also complains about clamd being outdate (0.97.8 vs. 0.98.1).
Is it possible that there was a database format change from 0.97 to 0.98 which Suse missed?
It seems, somebody forgot to update the packages for 12.3...! 13.1 has 0.98.
Please file a bug report and send a link to it back to this thread.
osc maintainer clamav -e
tells you the bug owner.
Link? -- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:14:50PM +0200, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
On 01/30/2014 10:57 PM, Lars Müller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 06:10:58PM +0200, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
On 01/30/2014 03:13 PM, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
since a couple of hours, freshclam constantly fails with "ERROR: Verification: Can't verify database integrity" after downloading main.cvd, no matter from which mirror it downloads the data.
It also complains about clamd being outdate (0.97.8 vs. 0.98.1).
Is it possible that there was a database format change from 0.97 to 0.98 which Suse missed?
It seems, somebody forgot to update the packages for 12.3...! 13.1 has 0.98.
Please file a bug report and send a link to it back to this thread.
osc maintainer clamav -e
tells you the bug owner.
Link?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/ is the bug tracking system used by openSUSE. In general see http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Submitting_bug_reports about how to report bugs or http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:OSC about the osc tool. If you need more help please elaborate your question a bit more. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On 01/30/2014 11:28 PM, Lars Müller wrote:
Please file a bug report and send a link to it back to this thread.
osc maintainer clamav -e
tells you the bug owner.
Link?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/ is the bug tracking system used by openSUSE.
In general see http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Submitting_bug_reports about how to report bugs or http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:OSC about the osc tool.
If you need more help please elaborate your question a bit more.
I mean link to this thread? I'm not gonna open up my IMAP server... -- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
On 2014-01-30 22:31, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
I mean link to this thread? I'm not gonna open up my IMAP server...
:-) No, he means that you create a Bugzilla (it is on a Novell web server), and then post a link to that Bugzilla into an email here, in this thread. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 12.3 x86_64 "Dartmouth" at Telcontar)
On 01/30/2014 11:33 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2014-01-30 22:31, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
I mean link to this thread? I'm not gonna open up my IMAP server...
:-)
No, he means that you create a Bugzilla (it is on a Novell web server), and then post a link to that Bugzilla into an email here, in this thread.
Ah :D. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861409 -- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
* Stefan Gofferje
On 01/30/2014 11:28 PM, Lars Müller wrote:
Please file a bug report and send a link to it back to this thread.
osc maintainer clamav -e
tells you the bug owner.
Link?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/ is the bug tracking system used by openSUSE.
In general see http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Submitting_bug_reports about how to report bugs or http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:OSC about the osc tool.
If you need more help please elaborate your question a bit more.
I mean link to this thread? I'm not gonna open up my IMAP server...
A reply to this thread containing the bug#/url should suffice. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2014-01-30 22:31, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
or http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:OSC about the osc tool.
But AFAIK this tool requires, besides downloading it, having a contributor account. This is excessive requirement of bu bug reporters. I'd suggest another route to find out who the maintainer is. http://software.opensuse.org/package/clamav https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=openSUSE%3A13.1&package=clamav http://openbuildservice.org/support/ users -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/users/openSUSE:13.1/clamav This gives three possible names: Dirk Mueller Stephan Kulow Tomáš Chvátal I remember previously seeing a link, that when clicked, directly opened a Bugzilla page with the appropriate fields already filled. I can no longer find that :-? - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 12.3 x86_64 "Dartmouth" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLqyM4ACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VL+ACfVUNO0u5IGYwyejU/k+sxqRzd +8IAn3MB0FvW0tyPw6dqm43gCDEEV1vX =FTbw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:49:02PM +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2014-01-30 22:31, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
or http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:OSC about the osc tool.
But AFAIK this tool requires, besides downloading it, having a contributor account. This is excessive requirement of bu bug reporters.
Yes, you're correct. The osc command requires an account. I had no longer been aware of this.
I'd suggest another route to find out who the maintainer is.
http://software.opensuse.org/package/clamav https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=openSUSE%3A13.1&package=clamav http://openbuildservice.org/support/
users -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/users/openSUSE:13.1/clamav
This gives three possible names:
Dirk Mueller Stephan Kulow Tomáš Chvátal
These three are listed as 'Maintainer' and not as 'Bugowner'. Why ever nobody is listed there and the osc tool reports one. :\ That I count a bug in the web UI. Please report it.
I remember previously seeing a link, that when clicked, directly opened a Bugzilla page with the appropriate fields already filled. I can no longer find that :-?
If something like this exists any anyone knows and uses it please add it to the bug reporting howto page. Cheers, Lars -- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:31:02PM +0200, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
On 01/30/2014 11:28 PM, Lars Müller wrote: [ 8< ]
If you need more help please elaborate your question a bit more.
I mean link to this thread? I'm not gonna open up my IMAP server...
Sorry, if I had not been clear. I intended two references: a) In the bug report a link to this thread pointing to the list archive http://lists.opensuse.org/ See https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861409#c2 b) A reply back to this list with the bug ID as you later did. This bidirectional referencing makes it easier for people to follow if they are not subscribed to this list but get a bug assigned, filed, reported via bugzilla. btw you did not make use of the osc maintainer hint I've given. If it would have been a real issue the report would therfore still stuck in the bnc-team-screening queue and the reporter would take notice of it maybe a week after you reported it. Thanks, Lars
-- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
-- Lars Müller [ˈlaː(r)z ˈmʏlɐ] Samba Team + SUSE Labs SUSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
On 01/31/2014 11:50 AM, Lars Müller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:31:02PM +0200, Stefan Gofferje wrote:
On 01/30/2014 11:28 PM, Lars Müller wrote: [ 8< ]
If you need more help please elaborate your question a bit more.
I mean link to this thread? I'm not gonna open up my IMAP server...
Sorry, if I had not been clear. I intended two references:
a) In the bug report a link to this thread pointing to the list archive http://lists.opensuse.org/ See https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861409#c2
b) A reply back to this list with the bug ID as you later did.
This bidirectional referencing makes it easier for people to follow if they are not subscribed to this list but get a bug assigned, filed, reported via bugzilla.
btw you did not make use of the osc maintainer hint I've given. If it would have been a real issue the report would therfore still stuck in the bnc-team-screening queue and the reporter would take notice of it maybe a week after you reported it.
I did not have OSC installed and it has a ton of dependencies that it wants to install along if you install it. I didn't have the time yesterday to quickly evaluate the impact of installing all this stuff on my system - let alone figure out what osc is and what is does. I'm not familiar with this program. I would have checked today and decided then. Besides, my clamd was going down after another signature update failure around 0300Z again. Is anybody aware of some problems project-side? -- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
Just doing an strace but now it works. Probably something broken signature-server side. -- (o_ Stefan Gofferje | SCLT, MCP, CCSA //\ Reg'd Linux User #247167 | VCP #2263 V_/_ Heckler & Koch - the original point and click interface
participants (7)
-
Carlos E. R. -
Carlos E. R. -
ellanios82 -
John Andersen -
Lars Müller -
Patrick Shanahan -
Stefan Gofferje