Hello, I asked which java IDE is better on suse 9.1 and got several helpful suggestions - jedit, bluej,netbeans, jbuilder and eclipse. I tried all of them and prefer netbeans because of its small, fast and better java support. Eclipse is also nice with a better user interface, but it runs slow on my Duron 800 pc. Happy new year to everyone! carl
--- Jerry Feldman <gaf@blu.org> wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:35:25 -0500 (EST)
eh man <rail_1973@yahoo.ca> wrote:
Hello,
What is the good java IDE environment on suse 9.1?
How
about eclipse?
Both Eclipse and NetBeans are good. Both have their string and weak points. I was working on a project where Eclipse had been the recommended tool, but someone else had downloaded netbeans. (http://www.netbeans.org/). After some research, I found that there were some things we needed that were supported by Netbeans and not by Eclipse. personally, I found the Eclipse front end to be a bit more polished, but I found that Netbeans tends to fit into a Unix/Linux environment a bit better.
-- Jerry Feldman <gaf@blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
Carl, On Saturday 01 January 2005 16:48, carl wrote:
Hello,
I asked which java IDE is better on suse 9.1 and got several helpful suggestions - jedit, bluej,netbeans, jbuilder and eclipse. I tried all of them and prefer netbeans because of its small, fast and better java support. Eclipse is also nice with a better user interface, but it runs slow on my Duron 800 pc.
Happy new year to everyone!
I decided to install Netbeans 4 to see how it has progressed since I last tried using it a few years ago. While it's clear it has a lot of good Java-specific functions, the most salient characteristic I noticed is how sluggish it is. And I have a 3.0 GHz Hyperthreading CPU, 1 GB of RAM and Ultra-160 SCSI drives! In contrast, jEdit is quite snappy on this system as well as on several earlier generations of (slower) systems I've owned.
carl
Randall Schulz
carl wrote:
I asked which java IDE is better on suse 9.1 and got several helpful suggestions - jedit, bluej,netbeans, jbuilder and eclipse. I tried all of them and prefer netbeans because of its small, fast and better java support. Eclipse is also nice with a better user interface, but it runs slow on my Duron 800 pc.
Great choice :) If you need help, subscribe to the nbusers list: http://www.netbeans.org/community/lists/top.html Now if SUSE would only include it in their distro. There seems to be some concern about licensing issues... -- ================================================================= Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) ----------------------------------------------------------------- The one sticking point between us and the open-source community is that we actually think that compatibility matters. ----------------------------------------------------------------- -James Gosling, creator of Java =================================================================
Le 1 Janvier 2005 19:48, carl a écrit :
Hello,
I asked which java IDE is better on suse 9.1 and got several helpful suggestions - jedit, bluej,netbeans, jbuilder and eclipse. I tried all of them and prefer netbeans because of its small, fast and better java support. Eclipse is also nice with a better user interface, but it runs slow on my Duron 800 pc.
Happy new year to everyone!
carl
netbeans are very nice, small, fast and nice gui... eclipse are very nice but it's very slow... (2ghz, 512 ram) the best tool i found to create gui java program are jbuilder -- La boîte à prog http://www.laboiteaprog.com
Marc, On Sunday 02 January 2005 19:06, Marc Collin wrote:
...
netbeans are very nice, small, fast and nice gui... eclipse are very nice but it's very slow... (2ghz, 512 ram) the best tool i found to create gui java program are jbuilder
I've discovered that the sluggishness of NetBeans I reported in my previous message is entirely the consequence of enabling font anti-aliasing in NetBeans itself. Disabling it makes NetBeans quite responsive. NetBeans: Tools -> Options: Editor Settings: Text Antialiasing: Off Randall Schulz
On Sunday 02 January 2005 19:00, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Marc,
On Sunday 02 January 2005 19:06, Marc Collin wrote:
...
netbeans are very nice, small, fast and nice gui... eclipse are very nice but it's very slow... (2ghz, 512 ram) the best tool i found to create gui java program are jbuilder
I've discovered ...
I've discovered other issues, too. Well, one, at least. If you choose certain fonts, "CMU Typewriter Text" being one of them, NetBeans will crash. But before it crashes it will record that font selection in the appropriate settings file. Then, when you launch it again, it will first inform you that either it has crashed or it is still running and when you tell it to go ahead and start, it will crash again in the same way it did when you first selected the culprit font. And from there on, it's just the same thing over and over again. The only way out is to edit "~/.netbeans/4.0/config/Editors/text/x-java/fontsColors.xml" and replace the name of the problematic font with an acceptable one, such as "Monosopaced" or "Lucida Sans Typewriter". You have been warned! Randall Schulz
participants (4)
-
carl -
Glenn Holmer -
Marc Collin -
Randall R Schulz