I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll The system now identifies as follows: # cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed" But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d # ls /etc/zypp/repos.d base-non-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-debug.repo base-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss.repo base-src-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-source.repo h264.repo openSUSE:update-tumbleweed.repo NVIDIA:repo-non-free.repo packman.repo openSUSE:repo-non-oss.repo update.repo openSUSE:repo-openh264.repo (trying to start Yast Software Manager just brings on a hang) Shouldn't the ID be the same as the NAME or the PRETTY_NAME to prevent this? Or is it OK for these additional repos to be used?
On 2023-11-12 02:29, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll
The system now identifies as follows:
# cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed"
But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d
Adding Nvidia repo causes the repository list to be replaced. At least it happens on Leap. Andrei Borzenkov: ... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.» Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/> -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.5 (Laicolasse))
Carlos E. R. via openSUSE Users composed on 2023-11-12 02:36 (UTC+0100):
Adding Nvidia repo causes the repository list to be replaced. At least it happens on Leap.
Andrei Borzenkov:
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
That package should not affect repos whose names differ from the redundant standard names. Thus, it shouldn't happen here even if I had openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA installed: # zypper lr | grep http -rw-r--r-- 1 181 Oct 15 00:00 /etc/zypp/repos.d/NonOSS.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 171 Oct 15 00:00 /etc/zypp/repos.d/OSS.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 172 Oct 15 00:00 /etc/zypp/repos.d/Update.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 204 Feb 8 2023 /etc/zypp/repos.d/openh264.repo # zypper lr | grep http 1 | NonOSS | Yes | (r ) Yes | http://cdn.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/ALP:/Experimental:/Slowroll/b... 2 | OSS | Yes | (r ) Yes | http://cdn.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/ALP:/Experimental:/Slowroll/b... 3 | Update | Yes | (r ) Yes | http://cdn.opensuse.org/repositories/openSUSE:/ALP:/Experimental:/Slowroll/s... 4 | openh264 | Yes | (r ) Yes | http://codecs.opensuse.org/openh264/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/ # -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:36:38 +0100 "Carlos E. R. via openSUSE Users" <users@lists.opensuse.org> :
On 2023-11-12 02:29, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll
The system now identifies as follows:
# cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed"
But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d
Adding Nvidia repo causes the repository list to be replaced. At least it happens on Leap.
Andrei Borzenkov:
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
Ok, if I understand correctly, having an nVidia card causes a hard-requirement for that repo and the addition of that repo causes the repo list to be replaced 1 The butler's INTENT to make the repo AVAILABLE to the master is admirable, but any decison to actually USE nvidia shitware is really an administrative one and as such is a user prerogative 2 Regardless of rationale, the repo list (content of /etrc/zypp/repos.d??) isn't REPLACED, it is ADDED to. 3 The cited "NVIDIA:" & "openSUSE:" repos or service lists are TUMBLEWEED ones and as such have no place in the Slowroll ether. Unless I read something ack bassward, TW-ANYTHING is admissible ONLY as a starting point for Slowroll ccreation after which anything NOT Slowroll is to be blacklisted. I'm trying to *prevent* pollution by non-Slowroll sources so as to have a Slowroll system updated only from Slowroll repos WHEN Slowroll updates are released.
-- Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from openSUSE 15.5 (Laicolasse))
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-11-23 21:31]:
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:36:38 +0100 "Carlos E. R. via openSUSE Users" <users@lists.opensuse.org> :
On 2023-11-12 02:29, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll
The system now identifies as follows:
# cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed"
But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d
Adding Nvidia repo causes the repository list to be replaced. At least it happens on Leap.
Andrei Borzenkov:
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
Ok, if I understand correctly, having an nVidia card causes a hard-requirement for that repo and the addition of that repo causes the repo list to be replaced
1 The butler's INTENT to make the repo AVAILABLE to the master is admirable, but any decison to actually USE nvidia shitware is really an administrative one and as such is a user prerogative
2 Regardless of rationale, the repo list (content of /etrc/zypp/repos.d??) isn't REPLACED, it is ADDED to.
3 The cited "NVIDIA:" & "openSUSE:" repos or service lists are TUMBLEWEED ones and as such have no place in the Slowroll ether. Unless I read something ack bassward, TW-ANYTHING is admissible ONLY as a starting point for Slowroll ccreation after which anything NOT Slowroll is to be blacklisted.
I'm trying to *prevent* pollution by non-Slowroll sources so as to have a Slowroll system updated only from Slowroll repos WHEN Slowroll updates are released.
-- Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from openSUSE 15.5 (Laicolasse))
you do understand that "slowroll" is a "version of tumbleweed", just not updated as frequently? ie: slowroll uses tumbleweed packages. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet oftc
Sat, 11 Nov 2023 21:39:23 -0500 Patrick Shanahan <paka@opensuse.org> :
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-11-23 21:31]:
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:36:38 +0100 "Carlos E. R. via openSUSE Users" <users@lists.opensuse.org> :
On 2023-11-12 02:29, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll
The system now identifies as follows:
# cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed"
But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d
Adding Nvidia repo causes the repository list to be replaced. At least it happens on Leap.
Andrei Borzenkov:
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
Ok, if I understand correctly, having an nVidia card causes a hard-requirement for that repo and the addition of that repo causes the repo list to be replaced
1 The butler's INTENT to make the repo AVAILABLE to the master is admirable, but any decison to actually USE nvidia shitware is really an administrative one and as such is a user prerogative
2 Regardless of rationale, the repo list (content of /etrc/zypp/repos.d??) isn't REPLACED, it is ADDED to.
3 The cited "NVIDIA:" & "openSUSE:" repos or service lists are TUMBLEWEED ones and as such have no place in the Slowroll ether. Unless I read something ack bassward, TW-ANYTHING is admissible ONLY as a starting point for Slowroll ccreation after which anything NOT Slowroll is to be blacklisted.
I'm trying to *prevent* pollution by non-Slowroll sources so as to have a Slowroll system updated only from Slowroll repos WHEN Slowroll updates are released.
you do understand that "slowroll" is a "version of tumbleweed", just not updated as frequently? ie: slowroll uses tumbleweed packages.
No I don't. It may be so, it just didn't come across that way. Does the user decide WHEN to update Slowroll? If so then it's no different from a less frequentluy updated Tumbleweed, same as before with no changes. Why the slowroll repos then? It's all less verbose and more confusing than need be.
On 2023-11-12 03:48, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
Sat, 11 Nov 2023 21:39:23 -0500 Patrick Shanahan <paka@opensuse.org> :
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-11-23 21:31]:
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:36:38 +0100 "Carlos E. R. via openSUSE Users" <users@lists.opensuse.org> :
I'm trying to *prevent* pollution by non-Slowroll sources so as to have a Slowroll system updated only from Slowroll repos WHEN Slowroll updates are released.
you do understand that "slowroll" is a "version of tumbleweed", just not updated as frequently? ie: slowroll uses tumbleweed packages.
No I don't. It may be so, it just didn't come across that way. Does the user decide WHEN to update Slowroll? If so then it's no different from a less frequentluy updated Tumbleweed, same as before with no changes. Why the slowroll repos then? It's all less verbose and more confusing than need be.
It is confusing. In fact, I'm using your Q&A to learn about slowroll myself ;-) -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.5 (Laicolasse))
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:55:48 +0100 "Carlos E. R. via openSUSE Users" <users@lists.opensuse.org> :
On 2023-11-12 03:48, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
Sat, 11 Nov 2023 21:39:23 -0500 Patrick Shanahan <paka@opensuse.org> :
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-11-23 21:31]:
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:36:38 +0100 "Carlos E. R. via openSUSE Users" <users@lists.opensuse.org> :
I'm trying to *prevent* pollution by non-Slowroll sources so as to have a Slowroll system updated only from Slowroll repos WHEN Slowroll updates are released.
you do understand that "slowroll" is a "version of tumbleweed", just not updated as frequently? ie: slowroll uses tumbleweed packages.
No I don't. It may be so, it just didn't come across that way. Does the user decide WHEN to update Slowroll? If so then it's no different from a less frequentluy updated Tumbleweed, same as before with no changes. Why the slowroll repos then? It's all less verbose and more confusing than need be.
It is confusing.
In fact, I'm using your Q&A to learn about slowroll myself ;-)
We live in the TCME (Total Credibility Meltdown Epoch) when everyone is lying about everything all of the time :-)
On 12.11.2023 05:30, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote: ...
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
Ok, if I understand correctly, having an nVidia card causes a hard-requirement for that repo
It is not the hard requirement. Read the provided link.
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 09:13:15 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> :
On 12.11.2023 05:30, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote: ...
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
Ok, if I understand correctly, having an nVidia card causes a hard-requirement for that repo
It is not the hard requirement. Read the provided link.
I did but I neither understand it nor do I know if or how it applies to Slowroll, more specifically to whether Slowroll should or should not use repos not listed on the Slowroll page and if not then how to prevent them from being used by the zypper dup command cited in the same reference.
On 12.11.2023 15:08, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 09:13:15 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> :
On 12.11.2023 05:30, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote: ...
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
Ok, if I understand correctly, having an nVidia card causes a hard-requirement for that repo
It is not the hard requirement. Read the provided link.
I did but I neither understand it nor do I know if or how it applies to Slowroll, more specifically to whether Slowroll should or should not use repos not listed on the Slowroll page and if not then how to prevent them from being used by the zypper dup command cited in the same reference.
Quoting this link "Remove openSUSE-repos-Leap and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA and lock them."
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:37:13 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> :
On 12.11.2023 15:08, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 09:13:15 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> :
On 12.11.2023 05:30, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote: ...
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
Ok, if I understand correctly, having an nVidia card causes a hard-requirement for that repo
It is not the hard requirement. Read the provided link.
I did but I neither understand it nor do I know if or how it applies to Slowroll, more specifically to whether Slowroll should or should not use repos not listed on the Slowroll page and if not then how to prevent them from being used by the zypper dup command cited in the same reference.
Quoting this link
"Remove openSUSE-repos-Leap and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA and lock them."
A search for openSUSE-repos-* or for file * containing openSUSE-repos-* returned nothing. So I went looking for packages in this (originally TW) Slowroll system, found them and deleted them. The applicable one-liners should maybe be added to the reeferenced help page: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll {Yast2 fails so I took them out using yast where I saw no way to taboo a package}.
Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users composed on 2023-11-12 09:16 (UTC-0500):
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:37:13 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov composed :
Quoting this link
"Remove openSUSE-repos-Leap and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA and lock them."
A search for openSUSE-repos-* or for file * containing openSUSE-repos-* returned nothing. So I went looking for packages in this (originally TW) Slowroll system, found them and deleted them. The applicable one-liners should maybe be added to the reeferenced help page:
{Yast2 fails so I took them out using yast where I saw no way to taboo a package}.
zypper rm openSUSE-repos-Leap openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA zypper al openSUSE-repos-Leap openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA or zypper rm openSUSE-repos-Leap openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA zypper al openSUSE-repos-Lea* -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, like religion, based on faith, not based on science. Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata
On 2023-11-12 16:40, Felix Miata wrote:
Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users composed on 2023-11-12 09:16 (UTC-0500):
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:37:13 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov composed :
Quoting this link
"Remove openSUSE-repos-Leap and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA and lock them."
A search for openSUSE-repos-* or for file * containing openSUSE-repos-* returned nothing. So I went looking for packages in this (originally TW) Slowroll system, found them and deleted them. The applicable one-liners should maybe be added to the reeferenced help page:
{Yast2 fails so I took them out using yast where I saw no way to taboo a package}.
Seek better, or they will be reinstalled behind your back.
zypper rm openSUSE-repos-Leap openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA zypper al openSUSE-repos-Leap openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA
or
zypper rm openSUSE-repos-Leap openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA zypper al openSUSE-repos-Lea*
Right. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.5 (Laicolasse))
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-12-23 09:18]:
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:37:13 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> :
On 12.11.2023 15:08, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote:
Sun, 12 Nov 2023 09:13:15 +0300 Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> :
On 12.11.2023 05:30, Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users wrote: ...
... «results in the openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA package as recommended and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA pulls in the openSUSE-repos-Leap package as a hard requirement.»
Archived-At: <https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/users@lists.opensuse.org/message/OOSV4CIJYRPTRY2G45KGTJBOYA5B3IRV/>
Ok, if I understand correctly, having an nVidia card causes a hard-requirement for that repo
It is not the hard requirement. Read the provided link.
I did but I neither understand it nor do I know if or how it applies to Slowroll, more specifically to whether Slowroll should or should not use repos not listed on the Slowroll page and if not then how to prevent them from being used by the zypper dup command cited in the same reference.
Quoting this link
"Remove openSUSE-repos-Leap and openSUSE-repos-Leap-NVIDIA and lock them."
A search for openSUSE-repos-* or for file * containing openSUSE-repos-* returned nothing. So I went looking for packages in this (originally TW) Slowroll system, found them and deleted them. The applicable one-liners should maybe be added to the reeferenced help page:
then do your part. it is a wiki and you *can* edit it.
{Yast2 fails so I took them out using yast where I saw no way to taboo a package}.
zypper lock --help google "yast taboo" -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet oftc
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-11-23 20:31]:
I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll
The system now identifies as follows:
# cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed"
But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d
# ls /etc/zypp/repos.d base-non-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-debug.repo base-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss.repo base-src-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-source.repo h264.repo openSUSE:update-tumbleweed.repo NVIDIA:repo-non-free.repo packman.repo openSUSE:repo-non-oss.repo update.repo openSUSE:repo-openh264.repo
(trying to start Yast Software Manager just brings on a hang)
Shouldn't the ID be the same as the NAME or the PRETTY_NAME to prevent this? Or is it OK for these additional repos to be used?
your repos are ok for tumbleweed, but somehow you have pulled in slowroll and I don't know enough about it to advise. but I have run tumbleweed/evergreen from inception some years ago. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet oftc
On 2023-11-12 03:16, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-11-23 20:31]:
I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll
The system now identifies as follows:
# cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed"
But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d
# ls /etc/zypp/repos.d base-non-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-debug.repo base-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss.repo base-src-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-source.repo h264.repo openSUSE:update-tumbleweed.repo NVIDIA:repo-non-free.repo packman.repo openSUSE:repo-non-oss.repo update.repo openSUSE:repo-openh264.repo
(trying to start Yast Software Manager just brings on a hang)
Shouldn't the ID be the same as the NAME or the PRETTY_NAME to prevent this? Or is it OK for these additional repos to be used?
your repos are ok for tumbleweed, but somehow you have pulled in slowroll and I don't know enough about it to advise.
No, his intention is to install slowroll. One of the documented procedures is to install TW, then dup to slowroll. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.5 (Laicolasse))
Sat, 11 Nov 2023 21:16:38 -0500 Patrick Shanahan <paka@opensuse.org> :
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-11-23 20:31]:
I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll
The system now identifies as follows:
# cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed"
But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d
# ls /etc/zypp/repos.d base-non-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-debug.repo base-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss.repo base-src-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-source.repo h264.repo openSUSE:update-tumbleweed.repo NVIDIA:repo-non-free.repo packman.repo openSUSE:repo-non-oss.repo update.repo openSUSE:repo-openh264.repo
(trying to start Yast Software Manager just brings on a hang)
Shouldn't the ID be the same as the NAME or the PRETTY_NAME to prevent this? Or is it OK for these additional repos to be used?
your repos are ok for tumbleweed, but somehow you have pulled in slowroll and I don't know enough about it to advise.
I fear that allowing updates from those TW repos would eventually REVERT my carefully screwed up Slowroller to a regular Tumbleweed thus defeating the entire conspiracy :-) -- Sooner than later all the Co2 reduction just causes gas to hit $100/liter and food production to become limited to weed-killer resistant GMO seeds; whoopie shit... hurrah for EXXON & MONSANTO or WTF.
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 21:40:30 -0500 "Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users" <users@lists.opensuse.org> wrote:
Sat, 11 Nov 2023 21:16:38 -0500 Patrick Shanahan <paka@opensuse.org> :
* Ben T. Fender via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> [11-11-23 20:31]:
I installed a clean Tumblweed and turned it into a Slowroll as per
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll
The system now identifies as follows:
# cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" # VERSION="20231003" ID="opensuse-tumbleweed" ID_LIKE="opensuse suse" VERSION_ID="20231003" PRETTY_NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed-Slowroll" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:opensuse:tumbleweed:20231003" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.opensuse.org" SUPPORT_URL="https://bugs.opensuse.org" HOME_URL="https://www.opensuse.org" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Slowroll" LOGO="distributor-logo-Tumbleweed"
But if I try to update with "zypper dup" then zypper pulls in NVIDIA & openSUSE (Tumbleweed) repos adding them to the Slowroll repos in /etc/zypp/repos.d
# ls /etc/zypp/repos.d base-non-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-debug.repo base-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss.repo base-src-oss.repo openSUSE:repo-oss-source.repo h264.repo openSUSE:update-tumbleweed.repo NVIDIA:repo-non-free.repo packman.repo openSUSE:repo-non-oss.repo update.repo openSUSE:repo-openh264.repo
(trying to start Yast Software Manager just brings on a hang)
Shouldn't the ID be the same as the NAME or the PRETTY_NAME to prevent this? Or is it OK for these additional repos to be used?
your repos are ok for tumbleweed, but somehow you have pulled in slowroll and I don't know enough about it to advise.
I fear that allowing updates from those TW repos would eventually REVERT my carefully screwed up Slowroller to a regular Tumbleweed thus defeating the entire conspiracy :-)
I know nothing about the subject but it sounds to me like there may be yet another bug report for Nvidia needed :) :(
participants (6)
-
Andrei Borzenkov -
Ben T. Fender -
Carlos E. R. -
Dave Howorth -
Felix Miata -
Patrick Shanahan