Hello, Anybody else getting EZMLM messages? Got one today of messages, in numerical order, from 282513 through 283253. (about 740 messages) I have been receiving a minimum of 75 messages a day at the mailbox. Bob S.
Hello,
Anybody else getting EZMLM messages? Got one today of messages, in numerical order, from 282513 through 283253. (about 740 messages) I have been receiving a minimum of 75 messages a day at the mailbox.
Bob S. I occasionally get these messages also. I had my ISP look at them but they say
On Mon October 2 2006 13:11, Bob S wrote: the problem is on the mail list end. I only get a couple of them, not as many as you. I have not found a solution yet. -- Russ
On Monday 02 October 2006 17:59, Lívio Cipriano wrote:
-------- On 2 October 2006 23:25, Russbucket wrote: --------
Anybody else getting EZMLM messages
Just for curiosity, why they call them EZMLM?
-- Regards, Lívio Cipriano
EaZy MaiLMan ? -- Regards, Rajko M.
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:59:02PM +0100 or thereabouts, Lívio Cipriano wrote:
-------- On 2 October 2006 23:25, Russbucket wrote: --------
Anybody else getting EZMLM messages
Just for curiosity, why they call them EZMLM?
The call in EZMLM because that is the name of the list server. It stands for e z mail list manager
From Google
http://cr.yp.to/ezmlm.html This server is self-policing. If any messages did not go through to the subscriber, it will let you know so you can download them from the list. -- Henry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Monday 2006-10-02 at 16:11 -0400, Bob S wrote:
Anybody else getting EZMLM messages?
Not recently.
Got one today of messages, in numerical order, from 282513 through 283253. (about 740 messages) I have been receiving a minimum of 75 messages a day at the mailbox.
It depends on the reason aduced for bouncing. Read this list FAQ, there is some info on that. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFIbT5tTMYHG2NR9URApkiAJ9JdWwAqcSD+JwKfoZrrZWQi9tkAQCdFJ/6 jnNeW1gD91FhwkbYYar8uxI= =msOB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hello,
Anybody else getting EZMLM messages? Got one today of messages, in numerical order, from 282513 through 283253. (about 740 messages) I have been receiving a minimum of 75 messages a day at the mailbox.
Bob S. yeah, got one each for the several Suse chans I subscribe to. Seems to happen periodically .. Servers get a brain cramp and spit out warnings to
into electronic streams flowing thru the cosmos On Monday 02 October 2006 4:11 pm, Bob S wrote: pple who are actually sending and receiving messages to the lists. <sigh> -- j To know a man, hear what he does not say, watch what he does not do...
* jfweber@gilweber.com
yeah, got one each for the several Suse chans I subscribe to. Seems to happen periodically .. Servers get a brain cramp and spit out warnings to pple who are actually sending and receiving messages to the lists.
I used to think that it was a problem with the servers, but since updating to 10.1, I have not expierenced EZMLM warnings, at all. But, uptime on 10.1 has been *much* better than ANYTHING previous. I have been unable to lock it up with all the _messing_ that I do. :^) -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2006-10-03 at 18:04 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I used to think that it was a problem with the servers, but since updating to 10.1, I have not expierenced EZMLM warnings, at all. But, uptime on 10.1 has been *much* better than ANYTHING previous. I have been unable to lock it up with all the _messing_ that I do. :^)
I very much doubt that those bounces are caused by your SuSE install. Much likely they are caused by hiccups at your internet provider, or SuSE's, but in order to make an educated guess one has to get a look at the reason adduced in the bounce message. For instance, the last one I got (June 9th), said, at the bottom: | Hi. This is the qmail-send program at lists.suse.com. | I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. | This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. | | <***@telefonica.net>: | 213.*.*.* does not like recipient. | Remote host said: 550 RCPT TO:<****@telefonica.net> User unknown | Giving up on 213.*.*.*. Obviously, that was a fault at my ISP, and it only affected one email; there is no way my install or at SuSE's end would affect it. Notice that as the remote server said it was a permanent error, it is bounced; otherwise, it would keep trying for some days. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFIulmtTMYHG2NR9URAnx5AJ44N202Rxv+W6oFIMULoeoTM2CZpQCglw0J l3ylLbRL7n94e9CGK7WpEFs= =Whpl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:11:46PM -0400, Bob S wrote:
Hello,
Anybody else getting EZMLM messages? Got one today of messages, in numerical order, from 282513 through 283253. (about 740 messages) I have been receiving a minimum of 75 messages a day at the mailbox.
I am using RBL on my postfix and lists.suse.com [195.135.221.131] apparently was blacklisted by spamcop.net which caused bouncing. Right now 195.135.221.131 is clear with spamcop.net. -Kastus
Kastus wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:11:46PM -0400, Bob S wrote:
Hello,
Anybody else getting EZMLM messages? Got one today of messages, in numerical order, from 282513 through 283253. (about 740 messages) I have been receiving a minimum of 75 messages a day at the mailbox.
I am using RBL on my postfix and lists.suse.com [195.135.221.131] apparently was blacklisted by spamcop.net which caused bouncing.
Right now 195.135.221.131 is clear with spamcop.net.
bl.spamcop.net is very aggressive with their listing. Be prepared to reject mail you wish to receive if you use it at the smtp level. Such aggressive lists should better be used in content filters like amavisd-new or spamd or in a weighted policy daemon like Robert Felbers policyweightd. I made a compromise and only check clients without reverse dns or a hostname that looks like a dialup address. No need to check EVERY connecting client if it is listed in bl.spamcop.net. Sandy -- List replies only please! Please address PMs to: news-reply2 (@) japantest (.) homelinux (.) com
participants (10)
-
Bob S -
Carlos E. R. -
Henry -
jfweber＠gilweber.com -
Kastus -
Lívio Cipriano -
Patrick Shanahan -
Rajko M -
Russbucket -
Sandy Drobic