This is the Postfix program at host linux.local. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below. The Postfix program <gbrown@localhost.linux.local>: host localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=02097-05, virus_scan FAILED: NO VIRUS SCANNERS AVAILABLE (in reply to end of DATA command) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reporting-MTA: dns; linux.local Arrival-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:24:45 -0600 (MDT) Final-Recipient: rfc822; gbrown@localhost.linux.local Action: failed Status: 4.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=02097-05, virus_scan FAILED: NO VIRUS SCANNERS AVAILABLE (in reply to end of DATA command) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: [SLE] Please help: SuSE 9.1 lockups during high CPU/disk activity From: Martin Deppe <Martin.Deppe@web.de> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:58:50 +0200 To: "SuSE Linux E..." <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Pieter Hulshoff wrote:
On Saturday 23 April 2005 00:16, Martin Deppe wrote:
Maybe it is a combination of the heat problem and a too low voltage problem which only leads to the lock up if the temperature raises above a certain point so that the voltage goes even further down to the point that it finally causes the lock.
I think it's mostly heat. I've currently got the door open, it's freezing in here, and my computer's rock stabily ripping a DVD to avi. CPU temperature is at 48C right now. If a Tagan 480W PSU (and one with very good reviews I might add) isn't capable of handling a 2 year old system, Athlon XP2000+ with radeon 9000 AIW card, then there's a serious problem I think.
I don't actually know whether you can use two or more PSU in one and the same box (I still have to check that for myself), but if this is possible it might be part of the solution beside the point to get the air better circulating inside your box for better cooling characteristics.
Using two or more PSUs is not a good thing. The voltages of those two PSUs will never be exactly the same, so you get internal power leakage (don't know the exact term for it in English I'm afraid). I wouldn't recommend it. As said though: a good 480W PSU should be more than enough for a system like mine.
Regards,
Pieter
I meant to use another PSU with the additional drives. Since they are connected only through the datacables it doesn't really matter that the voltages aren't exactly the same (I think). I think I will try it (or at least research on that) myself some time. I have a system with two CPU's which are 76°C to 77°C "warm" (always), if I can trust gkrellm and actually the BIOS too. So 48°C shouldn't be a problem at your side (I guess). However, I need to sleep now! Good luck Martin -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
On Saturday 30 April 2005 11:52 pm, Martin Deppe wrote:
This is the Postfix program at host linux.local.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix program
<gbrown@localhost.linux.local>: host localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0
No its just Mr GBrown has a horribly mis-configured postfix install. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 30 April 2005 11:52 pm, Martin Deppe wrote:
This is the Postfix program at host linux.local.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix program
<gbrown@localhost.linux.local>: host localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0
No its just Mr GBrown has a horribly mis-configured postfix install.
Thank you John, I was hoping (and actually expecting) that! :-) Martin
On May Sunday 2005 4:13 am, Martin Deppe wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 30 April 2005 11:52 pm, Martin Deppe wrote:
This is the Postfix program at host linux.local. <Snip>
<gbrown@localhost.linux.local>: host localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0
No its just Mr GBrown has a horribly mis-configured postfix install.
Thank you John,
I was hoping (and actually expecting) that!
Martin, in future you can get your problem resolved relatively quickly if you send a copy of the offending message(s) W/ full headers to the ¨ list-owner¨ . IT used to be CMK but, IIRC someone else volunteered to do it not too long ago.. you can likely find a link thru the additional commands link or the FAQ link at the bottom of the emails you get from the list.
jfweber@bellsouth.net wrote:
On May Sunday 2005 4:13 am, Martin Deppe wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 30 April 2005 11:52 pm, Martin Deppe wrote:
This is the Postfix program at host linux.local.
<Snip>
<gbrown@localhost.linux.local>: host localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0
No its just Mr GBrown has a horribly mis-configured postfix install.
Thank you John,
I was hoping (and actually expecting) that!
Martin, in future you can get your problem resolved relatively quickly if you send a copy of the offending message(s) W/ full headers to the ¨ list-owner¨ . IT used to be CMK but, IIRC someone else volunteered to do it not too long ago.. you can likely find a link thru the additional commands link or the FAQ link at the bottom of the emails you get from the list.
Thanks JF, I'll do that!
On May Sunday 2005 3:32 pm, Martin Deppe wrote:
jfweber@bellsouth.net wrote:
On May Sunday 2005 4:13 am, Martin Deppe wrote: <snip> in future you can get your problem resolved relatively quickly if you send a copy of the offending message(s) W/ full headers to the ¨ list-owner¨ . IT used to be CMK but, IIRC someone else volunteered to do it not too long ago.. you can likely find a link thru the additional commands link or the FAQ link at the bottom of the emails you get from the list.
Thanks JF, I'll do that!
n/p Of course the initials shuld have been CKM.. dyslexic fingers strike again...
participants (3)
-
jfweber＠bellsouth.net -
John Andersen -
Martin Deppe