what's the SuSE equivalent to service?
How do I do this in SuSE 10.0? service dansguardian start chkconfig dansguardian on Cheers, Steve.
On Saturday 11 March 2006 01:03, steve wrote:
How do I do this in SuSE 10.0?
service dansguardian start
/etc/init.d/dansguardian start that's all 'service' is in red hat. A shortcut to /etc/init.d/
chkconfig dansguardian on
chkconfig dansguardian on or insserv dansguardian -- Certified: Yes. Certifiable: of course! jabberID: anders@rydsbo.net
On Saturday 11 March 2006 01:23, Anders Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 11 March 2006 01:03, steve wrote:
How do I do this in SuSE 10.0?
service dansguardian start
/etc/init.d/dansguardian start
that's all 'service' is in red hat. A shortcut to /etc/init.d/
Thanks. Especially for including the explanation too. Steve.
Op zaterdag 11 maart 2006 01:23, schreef Anders Johansson:
service dansguardian start
/etc/init.d/dansguardian start
that's all 'service' is in red hat. A shortcut to /etc/init.d/
I would use rcdansguardian start. All services can be reached/executed without path with the rc prefix, e.g. rcapache2 start -- Richard Bos Without a home the journey is endless
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:48:51 +0100, Richard Bos wrote:
I would use rcdansguardian start.
Only packages done by SUSE provide a symlink /etc/init.d/xxxxx -> /usr/sbin/rcxxxx . I doubt that you'll find it in packages like dansguardian. Philipp
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 04:36 +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:48:51 +0100, Richard Bos wrote:
I would use rcdansguardian start.
Only packages done by SUSE provide a symlink /etc/init.d/xxxxx -> /usr/sbin/rcxxxx . I doubt that you'll find it in packages like dansguardian.
So what is wrong with ln -s /etc/init.d/xxx /usr/sbin/rcxxx or must we
always cater for MCSEs?
--
Dave Cotton
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:14:11 +0100, Dave Cotton wrote:
So what is wrong with ln -s /etc/init.d/xxx /usr/sbin/rcxxx or must we always cater for MCSEs?
Nothing is wrong with the symlink. The point was, that you can't expect to find it in packages not done by SUSE, as Richard's mail seemed to imply. Philipp
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 10:42 +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:14:11 +0100, Dave Cotton wrote:
So what is wrong with ln -s /etc/init.d/xxx /usr/sbin/rcxxx or must we always cater for MCSEs?
Nothing is wrong with the symlink. The point was, that you can't expect to find it in packages not done by SUSE, as Richard's mail seemed to imply.
My point was that making the symlink is so simple and part of normal
Linux/Unix sysadmin that even MCSEs should be able to get their heads
round it.
--
Dave Cotton
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:42:55AM +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:14:11 +0100, Dave Cotton wrote:
So what is wrong with ln -s /etc/init.d/xxx /usr/sbin/rcxxx or must we always cater for MCSEs?
Nothing is wrong with the symlink. The point was, that you can't expect to find it in packages not done by SUSE, as Richard's mail seemed to imply.
I assumed the it was a suse package indeed. philip is right that if the packages is not doen by suse the rc* link might not be there (how inconvenient). -- Richard
participants (6)
-
Anders Johansson -
Dave Cotton -
Philipp Thomas -
radoeka -
Richard Bos
-
steve