I agree with Landy. No problems here. I actually had purchased the suite before even downloading the demo. It is still in production and passed the promised date. They have offered to give refunds to those who are unhappy with the delay. To those who wonder about Hancom 6.0 as stable and functional... it is enough, that I don't want a refund and will happily await it's release and shipment. Best Regards, Keith B. Landy Roman <landy@despiertapr.com> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:57:02 +0800 Jethro Cramp <jsc@rock-tnsc.com> wrote:
Hi Landy,
Still haven't had time to try your fsck suggestion <grin> I wonder if you could comment on these observations made by Mike Reith today:
try it yourself and you will see it is functional, ready and is the desktop hope for linux
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
I agree with Landy. No problems here. I actually had purchased the suite before even downloading the demo. It is still in production and passed the promised date. They have offered to give refunds to those who are unhappy with the delay. To those who wonder about Hancom 6.0 as stable and functional... it is enough, that I don't want a refund and will happily await it's release and shipment.
yes, i got the email offering a refund for the delay but i will wait for them to finish it... no hurry the evaluation works fine for me
On Monday 25 March 2002 1:20 am, Landy Roman wrote:
yes, i got the email offering a refund for the delay but i will wait for them to finish it... no hurry the evaluation works fine for me
Did either of you have problems with the x-html mimetype added by Quanta Gold screwing up Apache? Kevin
Is there a US English spell checker, or is it only UK English (e.g. color vs colour, theater vs theatre)? dj tuchler On Sunday 24 March 2002 19:15, kbb0927@cs.com wrote:
I agree with Landy. No problems here. I actually had purchased the suite before even downloading the demo. It is still in production and passed the promised date. They have offered to give refunds to those who are unhappy with the delay. To those who wonder about Hancom 6.0 as stable and functional... it is enough, that I don't want a refund and will happily await it's release and shipment.
Best Regards,
Keith B.
Landy Roman <landy@despiertapr.com> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:57:02 +0800
Jethro Cramp <jsc@rock-tnsc.com> wrote:
Hi Landy,
Still haven't had time to try your fsck suggestion <grin> I wonder if you could comment on these observations made by Mike Reith today:
try it yourself and you will see it is functional, ready and is the desktop hope for linux
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq and the archives at http://lists.suse.com
-- dj tuchler dtuchler@earthlink.net
participants (4)
-
Dennis J.Tuchler -
kbb0927＠cs.com -
Kevin Donnelly -
Landy Roman