[opensuse] Questions preparing for upgrade
Hi all, Well, I still haven't quite worked out my upgrade to 10.3. I'm hoping this coming week might be the big moment. I have a few questions first, if I may impose on people's kindness a little further. 1) I'm still having trouble making a really convincing backup. I've made a disk image, in multiple sections, and am tolerably confident of that. However, I'd really like to have a file-level archive of some kind also, as I figure it will be easier to restore user data from. But the problem is that I'm backing up onto a FAT formatted USB drive (and I'd prefer to leave the formatting alone if possible). The problem is that if I use tar, cpio, etc. to retain all the Unix filesystem features (owners, permissions, links, etc.) the resulting archive is too big (2GB file limit on the FAT drive). So, the question here is how can I persuade one of these tools to split the archive into chunks when writing to a filesystem. (I can make tar split, but so far it always uses the the same output filename, so all I ever get is the last chunk!) I did notice that "pax" looks to have more comprehensive options, but I've not been able to see how to make that do the job either. 2) What's the position with 10.3 w.r.t. the usual sources of "interest", i.e. video, audio and especially wireless lan? I have: 78: udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_8086_27a6' pci.product = 'Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller' pci.subsys_vendor = 'Toshiba America Info Systems' linux.sysfs_path_device = '/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.1' info.bus = 'pci' pci.device_protocol = 0 (0x0) info.udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_8086_27a6' pci.linux.sysfs_path = '/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.1' pci.subsys_product_id = 65296 (0xff10) linux.subsystem = 'pci' info.vendor = 'Intel Corporation' pci.product_id = 10150 (0x27a6) pci.vendor = 'Intel Corporation' info.product = 'Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller and: 77: udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_8086_27d8' pci.product = '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller' pci.subsys_vendor = 'Toshiba America Info Systems' linux.sysfs_path_device = '/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1b.0' info.bus = 'pci' pci.device_protocol = 0 (0x0) info.udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_8086_27d8' pci.linux.sysfs_path = '/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1b.0' pci.subsys_product_id = 65296 (0xff10) linux.subsystem = 'pci' info.vendor = 'Intel Corporation' pci.product_id = 10200 (0x27d8) pci.vendor = 'Intel Corporation' info.product = '82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller' and: 28: PCI 500.0: 0282 WLAN controller [Created at pci.286] ... Hardware Class: network Model: "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection" Vendor: pci 0x8086 "Intel Corporation" Device: pci 0x4222 "PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection" SubVendor: pci 0x8086 "Intel Corporation" SubDevice: pci 0x1040 Revision: 0x02 Driver: "ipw3945" Driver Modules: "ipw3945" Do I still have to get the wireless drivers separately? (I forget where they came from now) Thanks for any and all help, comments, etc., Cheers, Simon "You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions." — Naguib Mahfouz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday 25 May 2008 07:53, Simon Roberts wrote:
Hi all,
Well, I still haven't quite worked out my upgrade to 10.3. I'm hoping this coming week might be the big moment.
openSUSE is close to its version 11.0 release. Why don't you go for that instead? Given the limited support horizon on the openSUSE releases and the ever-improving hardware coverage (which appears to be one of your concerns), I'd go for the latest release. I may be forced to install a 64-bit version on one of my hosts (now running 10.3) and if that comes to pass, I'll probably go with 11.0.
I have a few questions first, if I may impose on people's kindness a little further.
I'll let people with real information address your actual questions.
...
Thanks for any and all help, comments, etc., Cheers, Simon
Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Randall R Schulz <rschulz@sonic.net> wrote:
On Sunday 25 May 2008 07:53, Simon Roberts wrote:
Hi all,
Well, I still haven't quite worked out my upgrade to 10.3. I'm hoping this coming week might be the big moment.
openSUSE is close to its version 11.0 release. Why don't you go for that instead? Given the limited support horizon on the openSUSE releases and the ever-improving hardware coverage (which appears to be one of your concerns), I'd go for the latest release.
I may be forced to install a 64-bit version on one of my hosts (now running 10.3) and if that comes to pass, I'll probably go with 11.0.
Randall, My impression is that 10.3 has been the best / most stable release since 10.0 The zypper process may not be perfect, but much better than 10.1 etc. 11.0 is still an unknown quantity. Seems like a reasonable choice to go 10.3 In 6 months we'll know how stable 11.0 is. For standard business desktop use I have 10.3 / 64-bit working just fine. (Firefox / flash / javascript audio is all 64-bit) Greg -- Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday 25 May 2008 10:56:13 am Greg Freemyer wrote:
For standard business desktop use I have 10.3 / 64-bit working just fine. (Firefox / flash / javascript audio is all 64-bit)
Greg - there exists 64-bit firefox / flash and audio? I wasn't aware. I ordered a few weeks back a new laptop - 64-bit/8G RAM - and it is coming with Red Hat. I know I can run KDE over red hat but that it isn't integrated. I am thinking of possibly switching to openSUSE 64-bit or SLED 64-bit. I'd be able to run the browser, flash and audio in native 64-bit? (I had assumed I'd be using 32-bit versions for those.) I bought the laptop speciifcally to run VM sessions of linux/unix and wintendo so the browsers running native would just be a plus. -- kai www.filesite.org || www.4thedadz.com || www.perfectreign.com remember - a turn signal is a statement, not a request -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Kai Ponte <kai@perfectreign.com> wrote:
On Sunday 25 May 2008 10:56:13 am Greg Freemyer wrote:
For standard business desktop use I have 10.3 / 64-bit working just fine. (Firefox / flash / javascript audio is all 64-bit)
Greg - there exists 64-bit firefox / flash and audio? I wasn't aware.
I ordered a few weeks back a new laptop - 64-bit/8G RAM - and it is coming with Red Hat. I know I can run KDE over red hat but that it isn't integrated. I am thinking of possibly switching to openSUSE 64-bit or SLED 64-bit. I'd be able to run the browser, flash and audio in native 64-bit? (I had assumed I'd be using 32-bit versions for those.)
I bought the laptop speciifcally to run VM sessions of linux/unix and wintendo so the browsers running native would just be a plus.
Kai, That machine is at my office, so I can't double check the versions, but I believe it is all 64-bit. I'm sure firefox is and I'm running the ff3 rc1 package. Flash works. Audio works. Ask again on Tuesday and I can tell you which packages I'm using for sure. Greg -- Greg Freemyer Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer First 99 Days Litigation White Paper - http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf The Norcross Group The Intersection of Evidence & Technology http://www.norcrossgroup.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Kai Ponte <kai@perfectreign.com> wrote:
On Sunday 25 May 2008 10:56:13 am Greg Freemyer wrote:
For standard business desktop use I have 10.3 / 64-bit working just fine. (Firefox / flash / javascript audio is all 64-bit)
Greg - there exists 64-bit firefox / flash and audio? I wasn't aware.
I ordered a few weeks back a new laptop - 64-bit/8G RAM - and it is coming with Red Hat. I know I can run KDE over red hat but that it isn't integrated. I am thinking of possibly switching to openSUSE 64-bit or SLED 64-bit. I'd be able to run the browser, flash and audio in native 64-bit? (I had assumed I'd be using 32-bit versions for those.)
I bought the laptop speciifcally to run VM sessions of linux/unix and wintendo so the browsers running native would just be a plus.
Kai,
That machine is at my office, so I can't double check the versions, but I believe it is all 64-bit. I'm sure firefox is and I'm running the ff3 rc1 package. Flash works. Audio works.
Ask again on Tuesday and I can tell you which packages I'm using for sure.
Greg
Okay apparently its only firefox that is 64-bit: MozillaFirefox-3.0-3.1 x86_64 flash-player-9.0.124.0-0.1 seems to only have a 32-bit version, but it works with above. audacity-1.3.4-3.pm.beta to my surprise I'm running the 32-bit version, even though a 64-bit version is available. I don't use it much, so I'm not going to experiment with the 64-bit version. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
participants (4)
-
Greg Freemyer
-
Kai Ponte
-
Randall R Schulz
-
Simon Roberts