Apologies if this gets duplicated - I sent it the first time when the list server was down and I'm not sure it got through. Anyway, I've got more info. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: 9.2 is really slow Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 16:39:57 -0800 From: Steve <ssivier1@comcast.net> To: suse-linux-e@suse.com Hi, I've just installed 9.2 on my test machine, a 300MHz PII with 256MB of ram. Given the stats of the machine, linux has always been a bit slow, but it's always been usable for me. With 9.2, however, the performance is pathetic. The install took the better part of 3 days (normally this takes me ~2 hours). Installing the software itself took > 15 hours - something that normally takes ~1 hour. With 9.1, the load while idle was ~0. With 9.2, it's between 4 and 6. I installed Suse the same way I've done it for the last 4 years and nothing really special about how I install it (as usual, I choose the "no acpi" option, but that and using the same partition setup is about the only special things I do). Since I haven't heard anybody else complain about this yet, I assume that there's something special about my situation (can't say what, though). Is there some option I missed in the install (something like, don't insert a "while (1);" loop in the kernel :)? Or some way to find out what is sucking up the cpu time (top lists X as the only process getting any significant cpu time). --------------------------------- After sending this the first time, I noticed that 9.2 is trying to probe my cd-rom more than once a second (at least judging by how often the light pops on). I suspect this might be the problem or part of the problem. Going to init 3 seems to confirm this a bit as the load drops down to normal levels. There's some suggestion in the list that suseplugger might be responsible for this, but I can't find suseplugger in the process list, so I can't kill it to try. Any ideas? Thanks, Steve