[opensuse] Re: Why does MS-Windows need no "initrd-equivalent" in order to boot w/a wider range of x86[-64] compat HW?
Claudio Freire wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Linda Walsh <suse@tlinx.org> wrote:
Jim Henderson wrote:
If you want to understand why Linux uses initrd, I suggest you take some time and talk with the Linux kernel developers, after reading up on the history of the Linux kernel.
Linux kernel developers will say it isn't necessary.
It's only when you want 1 kernel/disk image to move to rather diverse hardware -- which isn't something users generally do.
It's exactly what binary distributions do.
Isn't Windows a binary distribution? Or are you saying it includes source? Your argument that it is needed for binary distributions when Windows is a binary distribution as well, doesn't add up. You need a temporary media when you install the OS. But after it is installed, why do you need it? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
participants (1)
-
Linda Walsh