>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Bahram Alinezhad" (alineziad@yahoo.com) wrote:
In both nautilus and konqueror, file-types are often recognized correctly only when the file extension be missing; When a file has an extension, unexpected answers appear. Question is: If these file-browsers detect the file-format from its content, why are they deceived by extension? Generally, gnome detects file-types better than KDE, e.g. examine some MPEG files with .dat extension. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "CorvusE" (lists@pjsattic.com) wrote:
I cannot recreate this problem. Perhaps the files in question have bad headers? <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Sid Boyce" (sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk) wrote:
File extensions are a DOS/Windows invention or stolen from CPM as they can't detect file types, as far as they are concerned, if you rename a .mpeg file to .txt, it's a text file, right?, wrong, it's still MPEG, but dumb operating systems can't figure that out.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Copy a "shell-script" file to your home-directory and give it .zip .mpg .tar or .exe extensions; What do you see in Konqueror?! Repeat the same test with Nautilus. Thank you for your notice, Bahram Alinezhad, Rudehen, Tehran, Iran. _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com
On Monday 25 October 2004 11:24 am, Bahram Alinezhad wrote:
Copy a "shell-script" file to your home-directory and give it .zip .mpg .tar or .exe extensions; What do you see in Konqueror?! Repeat the same test with Nautilus.
Let's agree that Konqueror isn't Nautilus.... Why are you trying to make it so? (And you're getting a bit testy with your replies)
"Bahram Alinezhad" (alineziad@yahoo.com) wrote: ----------
In both nautilus and konqueror, file-types are often recognized correctly only when the file extension be missing; When a file has an extension, unexpected answers appear. Question is: If these file-browsers detect the file-format from its content, why are they deceived by extension? Generally, gnome detects file-types better than KDE, e.g. examine some MPEG files with .dat extension. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
"CorvusE" (lists@pjsattic.com) wrote: ----------
I cannot recreate this problem. Perhaps the files in question have bad headers? <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
"Sid Boyce" (sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk) wrote: ----------
File extensions are a DOS/Windows invention or stolen from CPM as they can't detect file types, as far as they are concerned, if you rename a .mpeg file to .txt, it's a text file, right?, wrong, it's still MPEG, but dumb operating systems can't figure that out.<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Copy a "shell-script" file to your home-directory and give it .zip .mpg .tar or .exe extensions; What do you see in Konqueror?! Repeat the same test with Nautilus.
Thank you for your notice, Bahram Alinezhad, Rudehen, Tehran, Iran. OK, that's one for bugs.kde.org, that shouldn't happen, it should use
Bahram Alinezhad wrote: the file command which understands file types. I shall post that up as a bug to them. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce .... Hamradio G3VBV and keen Flyer =====LINUX ONLY USED HERE=====
participants (3)
-
Bahram Alinezhad
-
Bruce Marshall
-
Sid Boyce