[opensuse] A Five Year Deal to Dump Novell/SuSE
http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000121 -- Kind regards, M Harris <>< -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 M Harris wrote:
Here is my reply to that piece of junk:
http://dev-loki.blogspot.com/2006/11/call-to-dump-suse-linux-wtf.html
I also posted it as a comment on lj but, of course, they didn't let it
through.
cheers
- --
-o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
/\\
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 12:48:12 PM +0100, Pascal Bleser (pascal.bleser@skynet.be) wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
M Harris wrote:
Here is my reply to that piece of junk: http://dev-loki.blogspot.com/2006/11/call-to-dump-suse-linux-wtf.html
I can't see in your reply an answer to the concerns I already expressed on this list (http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse/2006-11/msg01697.html). The relevant part is posted again below. May I ask you to comment? Thanks.
My understanding is that what Novell is trying to do is make sure that ONLY the variety of Linux controlled by Novell can be used (paying!) where it really matters and makes a difference (public administrations, schools and businesses).
If I'm wrong, that's good, but then can you please point me to official declarations from Microsoft, Novell or their single executives stating or admitting that any organizations or end user can professionally use or develop other "brands" of "Free as in Freedom" software without legal risks?
Helping Novell is helping the community.
That's difficult to believe *if* what Novell is doing strenghtens the concept that the community has no right or legal guarantees to develop or use, for any purpose, other Free Software. Again, please provide proofs that this is not the case, I'd really like (seriously) to be wrong on this.
Marco -- The right way to make everybody love Free Standards and Free Software: http://digifreedom.net/node/73 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 00:27 -0600, M Harris wrote:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000121
-- Kind regards,
Isn't this actually better suited to the OT list? I'm not trying to be a list Cop but the noise levels on the list have risen so much that I'm killing a good 75% of all messages. :/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Isn't this actually better suited to the OT list? I'm not trying to be a list Cop but the noise levels on the list have risen so much that I'm killing a good 75% of all messages. :/ Well... if you'll stop killing the *noise* and pay attention you may realize
On Saturday 18 November 2006 05:48, Mike McMullin wrote: that the life of the opensuse lists may be dubious to say the least... and maybe dead to say the most... This is a major issue right now... its news... its not noise... its right on topic..... and it has everything to offer the technical community supporting or thinking about supporting Suse in the future. The trouble in all of this (IMO) is the number of folks that think this issue is noise... to be relegated to an OT list where nobody is listening anyway... if you folks aren't going to listen on the primary list you absolutely aren't going to listen on the OT list... and if you don't start listening soon there may not be any Suse lists to listen to! YOU LISTENING?? (running for flame suit... hurry.... ) -- Kind regards, M Harris <>< -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 18 November 2006 21:30, M Harris wrote:
On Saturday 18 November 2006 05:48, Mike McMullin wrote:
Isn't this actually better suited to the OT list? I'm not trying to be a list Cop but the noise levels on the list have risen so much that I'm killing a good 75% of all messages. :/
Well... if you'll stop killing the *noise* and pay attention you may realize that the life of the opensuse lists may be dubious to say the least... and maybe dead to say the most...
This is a major issue right now... its news... its not noise... its right on topic..... and it has everything to offer the technical community supporting or thinking about supporting Suse in the future.
The trouble in all of this (IMO) is the number of folks that think this issue is noise... to be relegated to an OT list where nobody is listening anyway... if you folks aren't going to listen on the primary list you absolutely aren't going to listen on the OT list... and if you don't start listening soon there may not be any Suse lists to listen to! YOU LISTENING??
First, to whom are you addressing yourself when you say "you folks?" Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
...
M Harris <><
RRS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday 19 November 2006 00:45, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis. Heh... yeah... you're probably right... :-))
... oh, the first question, .... "you folks" is always meant in the sense of the royal "we," or in this context, the royal "you all". (which necessarily excludes me) ... my father-in-law used to have a saying which went something like this, " . . . no one is listening here except you and I, and most of the time I can't hear you . . . " or something like that... not sure I was listening. ;-) -- Kind regards, M Harris <>< -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 22:45 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Saturday 18 November 2006 21:30, M Harris wrote:
On Saturday 18 November 2006 05:48, Mike McMullin wrote:
Isn't this actually better suited to the OT list? I'm not trying to be a list Cop but the noise levels on the list have risen so much that I'm killing a good 75% of all messages. :/
Well... if you'll stop killing the *noise* and pay attention you may realize that the life of the opensuse lists may be dubious to say the least... and maybe dead to say the most...
This is a major issue right now... its news... its not noise... its right on topic..... and it has everything to offer the technical community supporting or thinking about supporting Suse in the future.
The trouble in all of this (IMO) is the number of folks that think this issue is noise... to be relegated to an OT list where nobody is listening anyway... if you folks aren't going to listen on the primary list you absolutely aren't going to listen on the OT list... and if you don't start listening soon there may not be any Suse lists to listen to! YOU LISTENING??
First, to whom are you addressing yourself when you say "you folks?"
Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
Thirdly, since when did adhering to a sense of order i.e. using OT for this actually non-technical discussion, mean that it isn't worth the discussion? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday 19 November 2006 00:34, Mike McMullin wrote:
...
Thirdly, since when did adhering to a sense of order i.e. using OT for this actually non-technical discussion, mean that it isn't worth the discussion?
I was responding to what M Harris seemed to be suggesting: that these discussion might effect Novell's decision-making. I don't have an opinion on where these conversation's happen. I can just as easily skim or ignore them here as in the OT list. (Tangentially, I don't much mind spam, either, for the same reason: it's easy to ignore. I _do_ find spam detector false positives annoying.) Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Saturday 18 November 2006 21:45, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
I'd take that action. You have already started to see the effect it has had. Ballmer mentioned it and so did Novell. They are both in ass-covering mode as we speak. Some of Novells own people are starting to speak out and even Microsoft hacks are noticing the flack. http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061115124430626 -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
On Sunday 19 November 2006 03:33, John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 18 November 2006 21:45, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
I'd take that action.
You have already started to see the effect it has had. Ballmer mentioned it and so did Novell. They are both in ass-covering mode as we speak. Some of Novells own people are starting to speak out and even Microsoft hacks are noticing the flack.
Because of traffic on these lists? Not likely. It's much more likely that it's news stories and blogs that supply the ostensible feedback leading to the perceived change in their public announcements.
Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
--- Randall R Schulz
First, to whom are you addressing yourself when you say "you folks?"
Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
Bupkis? Shame on you. It's been so long since I've heard that term I damn near snarfed my coffee when I read this. Don't be going and try to choke us old SUSE users. With all those threatening to jump ship, SUSE needs all of us stubborn old farts it can get. Frank ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 08:50 -0800, frank nelson wrote:
--- Randall R Schulz
wrote: First, to whom are you addressing yourself when you say "you folks?"
Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
Bupkis? Shame on you. It's been so long since I've heard that term I damn near snarfed my coffee when I read this. Don't be going and try to choke us old SUSE users. With all those threatening to jump ship, SUSE needs all of us stubborn old farts it can get.
The older and more stubborn the better. Us kids need all the roll models for stubborn resolve we can get its too easy to think of quitting just when the distro needs some positive feed back and honest critique. -- ___ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ | | | | [__ | | | |___ |_|_| ___] | \/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 19:00, Carl William Spitzer IV wrote:
users. With all those threatening to jump ship, SUSE needs all of us stubborn old farts it can get.
The older and more stubborn the better. Us kids need all the roll models for stubborn resolve we can get its too easy to think of quitting just when the distro needs some positive feed back and honest critique.
Old guys don't give up that easy. We've been around too long to believe in the first story. Being presented as Linux doesn't make the source correct. You can see all kind of them, from good willing, but short thinking and fast on trigger to MS trolls pretending to have Linux purity in mind. -- Regards, Rajko M. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Randall R Schulz
Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
Let me that while personally I did not read these emails over the weekend and was busy yesterday and therefore just now go through the list - and hate it that I cannot concentrate fully on 10.2 - I and others at Novell are in discussions with our management and they do hear and understand the concerns. A result of this is the open letter we just published signed by our CEO himself: http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/community_open_letter.html Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue November 21 2006 03:22, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Randall R Schulz
writes: Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
Let me that while personally I did not read these emails over the weekend and was busy yesterday and therefore just now go through the list - and hate it that I cannot concentrate fully on 10.2 - I and others at Novell are in discussions with our management and they do hear and understand the concerns. A result of this is the open letter we just published signed by our CEO himself: http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/community_open_letter.html
Andreas
Well AJ, given Ballmers history didn't you guys see this coming. M$ and Ballmer have a very long history of hypocrisy and deceit. From the tone of the letter it seems that perhaps Novell's intentions were honest and meant as you've declared in the open letter. But Ballmer and Gates have are well known to be pirates and tech raiders. This was just what they needed to recharge their FUD machine. The only upside I can see is if your corporate and industry clients see through M$' bullshit and therein further distance themselves from M$ - but that's not a given in the slightest. Remember that M$ did everything in it's power to kill and derail Linux and F/OSS. The only reason IMHO M$ even entertained entering into such an agreement in the first place is because their efforts to kill F/OSS have been largely unsuccessful and their clients (as well as many of their devs) are leaving the M$ coffers at a steady rate and M$ fears an anti-M$ critical mass isn't far behind. Hence, desperation ensues and M$ tries to woo Novell - all the while with a well crafted plan to undermine and destroy - I believe it's called the 3E! I just hope this doesn't backfire on Novell and negatively impact F/OSS and Linux. This is a pity! I have been using SuSU since 7.x. And when I think how SuSE started and where it's gone the thought of having it dismantled by Ballmer and his cohorts I find it a bitter pill to swallow - and can only imagine what the Original SuSE team feels. I truly hope this works out - but please please be careful when dealing with the likes of M$. I personally would trust them any further than I could spit - and I tend to dribble down my chin when I try :P Cheers, Curtis. - -- Spammers Beware: Trespassers will be shot, survivors will be shot again! Like the song say: "Everything's 'Zen'... I don't think so"! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFYuij7CQBg4DqqCwRApMlAKCqyrtBzFLFyNILMaHM+chxCiM7PgCfaVGP xiOGCN/Fdl+AaY8B68XI/Oo= =A+KK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Curtis Rey
[...] I just hope this doesn't backfire on Novell and negatively impact F/OSS and Linux. This is a pity! I have been using SuSU since 7.x. And when I think how SuSE started and where it's gone the thought of having it dismantled by Ballmer and his cohorts I find it a bitter pill to swallow - and can only imagine what the Original SuSE team feels.
I hope the same. But the reaction on the patent part has been - and that doesn't surprise me completely - quite bad by the community so let's see...
I truly hope this works out - but please please be careful when dealing with the likes of M$. I personally would trust them any further than I could spit - and I tend to dribble down my chin when I try :P
I'm not talking with them directly, so no fear ;-) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Randall R Schulz
writes: Secondly, how much effect do you think what transpires here will have on the decision-making process as Novell? My guess would be slim to bupkis.
Let me that while personally I did not read these emails over the weekend and was busy yesterday and therefore just now go through the list - and hate it that I cannot concentrate fully on 10.2 - I and others at Novell are in discussions with our management and they do hear and understand the concerns. A result of this is the open letter we just published signed by our CEO himself: http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/community_open_letter.html
Pity that the Microsoft statement attached to the letter simply reinforces the whole reason Microsoft insisted on including the patent issue. How many years before Microsoft can simply cash in their claims? Surely people should AGREE the terms before signing anything? In the meantime I'm moving everything away from SUSE - Sorry but it's not the way *I* do business :( -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/ Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 2006-11-21 06:57, Lester Caine wrote:
<snip> Pity that the Microsoft statement attached to the letter simply reinforces the whole reason Microsoft insisted on including the patent issue. How many years before Microsoft can simply cash in their claims? Surely people should AGREE the terms before signing anything?
In the meantime I'm moving everything away from SUSE - Sorry but it's not the way *I* do business :(
What about the word from the street that Novell caught M$ with its pants down with patented OSS code in its stuff? You discount that automatically just because you choose to? M$ actually said this: "Microsoft and Novell have agreed to disagree on whether certain open source offerings infringe Microsoft patents and whether certain Microsoft offerings infringe Novell patents." I guess M$ customers must be wondering just how long it will be before the evil Novell and the rest of the open-source community come after them. But that is just FUD, I guess -- unlike Balmer's pronouncements, which surely must be true! True enough, at least, to frighten off folks like you. I'll see your M$ legal department, and raise with the combined legal departments of IBM and DaimlerChrysler. Don't forget *your* unsubscribe message on your way out the door. -- The best way to accelerate a computer running Windows is at 9.81 m/s² -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
M Harris wrote:
NP is one guy I have no use for. He tends to be full of it. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
participants (14)
-
Andreas Jaeger
-
Carl William Spitzer IV
-
Curtis Rey
-
Darryl Gregorash
-
frank nelson
-
James Knott
-
John Andersen
-
Lester Caine
-
M Harris
-
M. Fioretti
-
Mike McMullin
-
Pascal Bleser
-
Rajko M
-
Randall R Schulz