RE: [SLE] SuSE 6.2 suddenly starts eating memory
Message-ID: <1100D69203AAD2118E3C00508B8B9E8A17095E@mailhost.intech.unu.edu> From: "Heupink, Mourik Jan C." <Heupink@INTECH.UNU.EDU> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:11:03 +0100 Subject: RE: [SLE] SuSE 6.2 suddenly starts eating memory <p>> I don't know how much help I can be. But if no one else has offered
yet... Thank you ;-)
What exactly does 'top' show is running? And what were the exact path names on the ftp server of the upgraded packages? for example: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/update/6.2/a1/aaa_base.rpm I assume that's the right stuff.
The 'top' screenshot may show the rogue program. First thing I'd check for is a rogue 'cron' job, especially one named 'manpath'. SuSE 6.4 had some trouble with that. These latest 6.2 packages may have the same problem.
So I found out, yes. I corrected the cron things. For now, it seems to be running fine. Swap: 120480K available, 744K used. It's not doing anything special, why should it want to use swap memory? Anyway: processes that are running include: smbd [samba], httpd [apache], hpwebjetd [with rather a lot of 'threads'], dhcpd, a perl thing, that's about it. Just a question. Is it normal to have only 3884K available on a machine that is not really doing a lot? 128MB installed, 124MB used, 4MK available. When I started up the box, it was using 54MB. This number increased a lot, but now it seems to be stabilized. Is that normal? Why does it use more and more memory upon normal circumstances?
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:01:57 +0100 (CET) From: Lenz Grimmer <grimmer@suse.de> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0011161659530.32273-100000@wiles.suse.de> Subject: RE: [SLE] SuSE 6.2 suddenly starts eating memory Hi, On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Heupink, Mourik Jan C. wrote:
So I found out, yes. I corrected the cron things. For now, it seems to be running fine.
Good.
Swap: 120480K available, 744K used. It's not doing anything special, why should it want to use swap memory?
I guess it had to swap out that process while memory was tight. Obviously Linux does not need to run this process very often. So why bother swapping it back in memory, if it is not used anyway?
Just a question. Is it normal to have only 3884K available on a machine that is not really doing a lot? 128MB installed, 124MB used, 4MK available. When I started up the box, it was using 54MB. This number increased a lot, but now it seems to be stabilized. Is that normal? Why does it use more and more memory upon normal circumstances?
Yes, this is normal. Linux uses free memory for cache memory. Why should the free RAM be left unused? :) LenZ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Lenz Grimmer SuSE GmbH mailto:grimmer@suse.de Schanzaeckerstr. 10 http://www.suse.de/~grimmer/ 90443 Nuernberg, Germany Only the mediocre are always at their best.
participants (2)
-
grimmer@suse.de
-
Heupink@INTECH.UNU.EDU