SaX2 1280x1024@75Hz but Desktop 1152x864@75Hz only

Hi, I've just installed Suse 9.3 Pro on a somewhat old but working Intel PII server with an onboard Cirrus Logic GD5480 graphic chip. The monitor was configured with SaX2 and tested OK with VESA 1280x1024@75Hz and no 3D. However after rebooting and login to KDE or Gnome the desktop screen resolution is found set to the lower 1152x864@75Hz, and there is no higher resolution available to select. I verified again with YaST2 and the monitor should be set 1280x1024@75Hz. Why does this happends and is it possible to extend the desktop resolution? (On another newer PC, the desktop resolution is set 1280x1024@75Hz just like SaX2 configuration). Thanks, Terje J. Hanssen

On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 21:21 -0500, Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
Also try running hwinfo --framebuffer to see which resolutions are supported by the graphics card. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge

On Saturday 04 June 2005 04.28, Ken Schneider wrote:
That doesn't give the correct resolution for X It only gives the resolutions available in framebuffer mode. Take my Matrox G400 DH for instance, I run it at 2x (dual head) 1280x1024 16 bit, but running hwinfo --framebuffer gives: 02: None 00.0: 11001 VESA Framebuffer [Created at bios.521] Unique ID: rdCR.xpCz25nMUV0 Hardware Class: framebuffer Model: "Matrox G400" Vendor: "Matrox" Device: "Matrox G400" SubVendor: "Matrox Graphics Inc." SubDevice: Revision: "00" Memory Size: 32 MB Memory Range: 0xd8000000-0xd9ffffff (rw) Mode 0x0300: 640x400 (+640), 8 bits Mode 0x0301: 640x480 (+640), 8 bits Mode 0x0302: 800x600 (+100), 4 bits Mode 0x0303: 800x600 (+800), 8 bits Mode 0x0310: 640x480 (+1280), 15 bits Mode 0x0311: 640x480 (+1280), 16 bits Mode 0x0312: 640x480 (+2560), 24 bits Mode 0x0313: 800x600 (+1600), 15 bits Mode 0x0314: 800x600 (+1600), 16 bits Mode 0x0315: 800x600 (+3200), 24 bits Config Status: cfg=no, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown It doesnt list any of the resolutions i use in X. -- /Rikard " Sharing knowledge is the most fundamental act of friendship. Because it is a way you can give something without loosing something." -R. Stallman --------------------------------------------------------------- Rikard Johnels email : rikjoh@norweb.se Mob : +46 763 19 76 25 PGP : 0x461CEE56 ---------------------------------------------------------------

Terje J. Hanssen wrote:
Check /var/log/Xorg.0.log, that will tell you what resolutions it's tried and can't do. I've never been able to get a 16M card to do more than 1024x768 properly. That card was supplied in 4, 8 or 16M versions, my guess is you have the 16M version. Regards Sid. -- Sid Boyce ... Hamradio License G3VBV, Keen licensed Private Pilot Retired IBM Mainframes and Sun Servers Tech Support Specialist Microsoft Windows Free Zone - Linux used for all Computing Tasks

Sid Boyce wrote:
Maybe CL cards are different, but I have 4M Tseng cards running up to 1600x1200 16 bit, and 16M G400 cards running up to 2048x1536 16 bit. Other chips ought to be able to do as well. -- "Love does not demand its own way." 1 Corinthians 13:5 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
participants (6)
-
Felix Miata
-
Joe Morris (NTM)
-
Ken Schneider
-
Rikard Johnels
-
Sid Boyce
-
Terje J. Hanssen