* Felix Miata [07-17-06 12:05]:

On further examination it seems mutt and evolution subscribers have their own reply-to set in their headers that SM is honoring. I tested on email from kmail and thunderbird users, and got the literal all behavior.

Mutt has a 'list-reply' (L) function as does kmail, but mutt does not default to list-reply. You must configure it with hooks or use the "L" (list-reply) function specifically. Some things a person must consider and choose intelligently rather than just doing the same thing all the time. After-all, linux *is* about *choice*. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com

On Monday 17 July 2006 18:02, Felix Miata wrote:

On further examination it seems mutt and evolution subscribers have their own reply-to set in their headers that SM is honoring.

While an email client should honour that with the "reply" feature, I would say that "reply all" should always go to sender and all recipients, so I would call this a bug -- Ut supra post festum sunt obscura -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com