[Fwd: [SLE] the directory "proc"]
Exactly what is the PROC directory and how does it get used by the system and user? Ted
Sat, 05 Feb 2005, by thilts@help-for-you.com: [..] , The question was answered already, what's the point in this re-send other then list polution? Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 26N , 4 29 47E. + ICQ: 277217131 SUSE 9.2 + Jabber: muadib@jabber.xs4all.nl Kernel 2.6.8 + MSN: twe-msn@ferrets4me.xs4all.nl See headers for PGP/GPG info. +
The Saturday 2005-02-05 at 12:21 +0100, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
The question was answered already, what's the point in this re-send other then list polution?
Has it? :-o :-? I don't see any answer on the thread. There are on another thread. But yes, reposting the next day is irksome. -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
Sat, 05 Feb 2005, by robin1.listas@tiscali.es:
The Saturday 2005-02-05 at 12:21 +0100, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
The question was answered already, what's the point in this re-send other then list polution?
Has it? :-o :-?
I don't see any answer on the thread. There are on another thread.
Several people explained the purpose of /proc in the original thread, to which the OP never replied. Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 26N , 4 29 47E. + ICQ: 277217131 SUSE 9.2 + Jabber: muadib@jabber.xs4all.nl Kernel 2.6.8 + MSN: twe-msn@ferrets4me.xs4all.nl See headers for PGP/GPG info. +
Sorry for the reposting. There were 5 different posts at the same time and all 5 got reposted by accident. I've had major email problems now for about a year. I get about 20 worms a day disguised as warnings coming from the US government and returned e-mail advisories coming at me from all over the place. It also seems like I'm the target of a dozen or so sexually perverted sources. All this stuff comes at me with an imbedded worm of one sort or another. My apologies. Thanks - Ted Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Saturday 2005-02-05 at 12:21 +0100, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
The question was answered already, what's the point in this re-send other then list polution?
Has it? :-o :-?
I don't see any answer on the thread. There are on another thread.
But yes, reposting the next day is irksome.
* Ted Hilts
Sorry for the reposting. There were 5 different posts at the same time and all 5 got reposted by accident. I've had major email problems now for about a year. I get about 20 worms a day disguised as warnings coming from the US government and returned e-mail advisories coming at me from all over the place. It also seems like I'm the target of a dozen or so sexually perverted sources. All this stuff comes at me with an imbedded worm of one sort or another.
and *you* continue to use the root cause of all these problems to operate your computer. Please, take a bow. You have reached the pinnacle. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos
Patrick, On Monday 07 February 2005 16:32, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Ted Hilts
[02-07-05 19:17]: Sorry for the reposting. ...
and *you* continue to use the root cause of all these problems to operate your computer. Please, take a bow. You have reached the pinnacle.
By which I take it you're referring to the evidence of this header from Mr. Hilts' posting: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 (nscd2) It kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it? Why do Windows users participate in a Linux forum? Perhaps if we're to grant the benefit of the doubt, I guess, as evidenced by his other postings to this list, that in this case it's an in-progress transition from Windows to Linux.
Patrick Shanahan
Randall Schulz
--snip
It kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it? Why do Windows users participate in a Linux forum?
--snip Well, some of us are at the office and have to use Windows there. Of course, I should be working............. ;-) David
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:29:07 +0300 (AST), David Robertson wrote:
--snip
It kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it? Why do Windows users participate in a Linux forum?
--snip
Well, some of us are at the office and have to use Windows there.
Of course, I should be working............. ;-)
David
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc. It is a lot easier to monitor this list with those than from outlook or some other e-mail client that does not understand threading. The biggest negative is that it does not have a list reply, and it includes the original senders e-mail in the reply. It takes an extra 30 seconds or so to manually fix these issues per reply. Greg -- Greg Freemyer
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote:
It kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it? Why do Windows users participate in a Linux forum?
--snip
Well, some of us are at the office and have to use Windows there.
Of course, I should be working............. ;-)
David
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
The biggest negative is that it does not have a list reply, and it includes the original senders e-mail in the reply. It takes an extra 30 seconds or so to manually fix these issues per reply. The best reason I know not to do the list at work. Outlook is without a doubt the worst email program I've ever had the displeasure to work with. I can hardly wait until we get upgraded to outlook 2003. ;(
Mike -- Powered by SuSE 9.2 Kernel 2.6.8 KDE 3.3.0 Kmail 1.7.1 For Mondo/Mindi backup support go to http://www.mikenjane.net/~mike 5:27pm up 1 day 1:21, 4 users, load average: 2.89, 2.56, 2.35
Mike, On Tuesday 08 February 2005 08:29, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote:
...
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
GMail has POP access, now.
...
Mike
Randall Schulz
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:34:51 -0800, Randall R Schulz
Mike,
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 08:29, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote:
...
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
GMail has POP access, now.
How does that help with the virus issue? Does gmail have good AV? I do like the gmail spam filtering, not too many false positives/negatives. Greg
Greg, On Tuesday 08 February 2005 09:05, Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:34:51 -0800, Randall R Schulz
wrote: Mike,
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 08:29, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote:
...
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
GMail has POP access, now.
How does that help with the virus issue?
I only addressed the objection to Web based email by pointing out that GMail has POP access. I made no claims or statements of any kind about virus blocking. Since this is a Linux list, virus blocking is not such a big deal, is it?
Does gmail have good AV?
Define good. You can read their claims as well as I. So far I've received exactly one message on my GMail account (the welcome message from the GMail system itself).
I do like the gmail spam filtering, not too many false positives/negatives.
Greg
Randall Schulz
and of course.... Thunderbird. Last time I played with Thunderbird under windows, it seemed to have some pretty good spam filtering..... B-) On Tuesday 08 February 2005 09:34 am, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Mike,
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 08:29, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 17:10, Greg Freemyer wrote:
...
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
GMail has POP access, now.
...
Mike
Randall Schulz
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 17:34, Randall R Schulz wrote: Randall,
...
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
GMail has POP access, now.
Yea.. But these government folks really get upset when you start messing with stuff like that.. ;-) Believe me, I'd love to get rid of the email system we are using right now.. But I don't see it happening in the near future. Mike -- Powered by SuSE 9.2 Kernel 2.6.8 KDE 3.3.0 Kmail 1.7.1 For Mondo/Mindi backup support go to http://www.mikenjane.net/~mike 6:15pm up 1 day 2:09, 4 users, load average: 2.27, 2.51, 2.75
Mike, On Tuesday 08 February 2005 09:19, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 17:34, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Randall,
...
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
GMail has POP access, now.
Yea.. But these government folks really get upset when you start messing with stuff like that.. ;-) Believe me, I'd love to get rid of the email system we are using right now.. But I don't see it happening in the near future.
So what _do_ you use? Telepathic email? If you're not using any standards-based mail, what can anyone here do to help you?
Mike
Randall Schulz
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 18:23, Randall R Schulz wrote: Randall,
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
GMail has POP access, now.
Yea.. But these government folks really get upset when you start messing with stuff like that.. ;-) Believe me, I'd love to get rid of the email system we are using right now.. But I don't see it happening in the near future.
So what _do_ you use? Telepathic email? If you're not using any standards-based mail, what can anyone here do to help you?
Naa. At work, I don't do personal stuff like this. Much as I'd like to. I keep the business separate from the fun stuff. I was only commenting when it was brought up to use a web based email service and that ours was blocked. You should see some of the stuff that gets blocked. Good example is any reference to online auction. Say cnn is carrying a story about something on ebay. Like that lady that sold the sandwich with the so-called picture on it. Because it mentioned ebay, and I mean simply mentioning it, the page was blocked. Reason given was "internet auction". OH, well, that's what I get for working for Uncle Sam.. Mike -- Powered by SuSE 9.2 Kernel 2.6.8 KDE 3.3.0 Kmail 1.7.1 For Mondo/Mindi backup support go to http://www.mikenjane.net/~mike 6:35pm up 1 day 2:29, 4 users, load average: 2.65, 2.42, 2.45
There are quite a few good folks on this list that would be VERY capable of setting up a good (as in Linux/qmail) mail server with anti-virus / spamassassin. <hint><hint> hehehe B=) On Tuesday 08 February 2005 10:19 am, Mike wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 17:34, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Randall,
...
At a minimum get a gmail account and use firefox to access it. And as always, be very, very carefull about what attachments you download. This will stop that vast majority of virus issues, even with windows pc.
That's a good idea.. Except that at the place I work, all web-based email is blocked. Yahoo, gmail, hotmail, ...
GMail has POP access, now.
Yea.. But these government folks really get upset when you start messing with stuff like that.. ;-) Believe me, I'd love to get rid of the email system we are using right now.. But I don't see it happening in the near future.
Mike
-- Powered by SuSE 9.2 Kernel 2.6.8 KDE 3.3.0 Kmail 1.7.1 For Mondo/Mindi backup support go to http://www.mikenjane.net/~mike 6:15pm up 1 day 2:09, 4 users, load average: 2.27, 2.51, 2.75
Greg Freemyer
The biggest negative is that it does not have a list reply, and it includes the original senders e-mail in the reply.
Well, at least the quoting of O/OE can be fixed by using OE quotefix from http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/ :) Philipp
Randall You are correct, it is an "in progress" transition that is very hard to accomplish. As an example, I use a (windows only) web authoring tool called HotMetal Pro V6 on 3 MS XP machines and 1 Win95 machine. It was the last version of this web authoring tool some 2 years ago. It is a true and easy to use WYSIWYG web authoring tool with advanced features. I have been looking, as time permits for a reasonably close product for Linux and failing that for Windows but in these 2 years have found nothing so far that even comes close. I am currently looking at a Linux web authoring tool that comes with the SuSE distribution. I use many other software tools that even several years old still out perform what I can find on Linux. I encourage vendors towards a Linux solution and they ignore me. I like SuSe. You have no reason to be hostile with me about the fact that my email is Netscape based. I use Netscape on Windows because it is all I know but I am investigating using Mozilla mail on Linux and simply have not had the time. I don't know everything about everything. My work requires research and knowledge in many fields of many things leaving me little time to become a 100% Linux guru. Computers and sofware products are only a very small part of my work. But I like SuSE. I like Linux. And I'm trying to like you guys. I have 6 linux machines on my LAN and one of them is Slackware, another is Red Hat, another is both Red Hat and SuSE, another is BSD and SuSE, and the remainder are all pure SuSE. Some of these 6 have also dual boot with Windows which is rarely used on these machine but is there anyway. I have 8 pure Windows machines 2 of which are XP and 1 is XP Pro. I don't like XP as it is full of flakey behaviors that can trash an entire directory and pause the complete system for a screen refesh and numerable other flakey things. I think Bill Gates not only over charges for the MS Operating systems but has also practiced and got away with numerous efforts at monopolizing computer software and techniques and technologies in general. In addition, by all reports I've heard he is a ruthless "money is the bottom line" business man. I would only repect him as a human being if he gave 50% of his net worth to a good cause. Unfortunately most of the world treats him as a "business Saint" worthy of their worship and admiration. I think that the MS Operating Systems started as a piece of junk and are still not worth the cost. I blame "Big Business", in this case "Big Software Business enterprises" for being stupid and money hungry to the point that if they really cared for excellence we would have by now all the products I need to do my work and in a Linux environment. Before I retired, I worked in Engineering and IT (Information Technology) and they thought I was crackers because of my interests and advocacy of Linux. Since then IBM (one of our (the company I worked for) main computer/software sources) has "seen the light" as well as the "financial gains" associated with Linux and appear rapidly to be turning Linux into a very expensive proposition when integrated with their product line as well as forcing Linux vendors like SuSE to compete. Thanks - Ted Randall R Schulz wrote:
Patrick,
and *you* continue to use the root cause of all these problems to operate your computer. Please, take a bow. You have reached the pinnacle.
Ted Hilts wrote:
You are correct, it is an "in progress" transition that is very hard to accomplish. As an example, I use a (windows only) web authoring tool called HotMetal Pro V6 on 3 MS XP machines and 1 Win95 machine. It was the last version of this web authoring tool some 2 years ago. It is a true and easy to use WYSIWYG web authoring tool with advanced features. I have been looking, as time permits for a reasonably close product for Linux and failing that for Windows but in these 2 years have found nothing so far that even comes close. I am currently looking at a Linux web authoring tool that comes with the SuSE distribution. I use many other software tools that even several years old still out perform what I can find on Linux. I encourage vendors towards a Linux solution and they ignore me.
I too find the lack of anything approaching a HotMetal Pro replacement is one of the factors that keeps me and some of my clients tied to Windows. I have searched and searched for a decent HTML editor. There are a lot of source editors out there (eg Bluefish) but a real dearth of WYSIWYG or semi-WYSIWYG editors. There are a few out there (Nvu, Mozilla composer, Quanta) and I test them each time a new version comes out. They're getting there but, you're right, none of them even come very close to the "old" and "obsolete" HotMetal Pro. I went though another round, just the last two days, of testing. Frustrating. Especially because they are getting closer but, still, no cigar. R.Parr, RHCE Temporal Arts Portland, OR U.S.A.
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 23:41, Randall J. Parr wrote:
Ted Hilts wrote:
You are correct, it is an "in progress" transition that is very hard to accomplish. As an example, I use a (windows only) web authoring tool called HotMetal Pro V6 on 3 MS XP machines and 1 Win95 machine. It was the last version of this web authoring tool some 2 years ago. It is a true and easy to use WYSIWYG web authoring tool with advanced features. I have been looking, as time permits for a reasonably close product for Linux and failing that for Windows but in these 2 years have found nothing so far that even comes close. I am currently looking at a Linux web authoring tool that comes with the SuSE distribution. I use many other software tools that even several years old still out perform what I can find on Linux. I encourage vendors towards a Linux solution and they ignore me.
I too find the lack of anything approaching a HotMetal Pro replacement is one of the factors that keeps me and some of my clients tied to Windows.
I have searched and searched for a decent HTML editor. There are a lot of source editors out there (eg Bluefish) but a real dearth of WYSIWYG or semi-WYSIWYG editors. There are a few out there (Nvu, Mozilla composer, Quanta) and I test them each time a new version comes out. They're getting there but, you're right, none of them even come very close to the "old" and "obsolete" HotMetal Pro. I went though another round, just the last two days, of testing. Frustrating. Especially because they are getting closer but, still, no cigar.
R.Parr, RHCE Temporal Arts Portland, OR U.S.A. Interesting....
Where can I get a copy of HotMetal... Does it run under Wine? CrossOver Office? VMware? Jerry
Jerry If it is no longer sold then I suppose there is no restriction in our passing around the executable installation file and the license??? If it is no longer sold then what is stopping us from reverse engineering it??? But I think you will find a vendor on the internet. Search for Hotmetal Pro. When I did this some many months ago I noticed that it was still being sold but apparently not being developed. Also, I think there is a web authoring WYSIWYG on the SuSE 9.1 Pro distribution that seems to have many of HotMetal's attributes (almost a copy in some cases). But I got lost in other issues (I'm dense you know -- according to some) and I've forgotten what I was doing. But I can find my way back to this tool after looking around my KDE installation which I will do for you in the next few days. If you don't hear from me within a week give me a reminder with subject formated as: "*** [SLE] Hotmetal and Linux equivalent -- Jerry. *** Thanks -- Ted Jerry Westrick wrote:
Where can I get a copy of HotMetal... Does it run under Wine? CrossOver Office? VMware?
Jerry
He wasn't giving you greif about Netscape, he was giving you greif about windoze. You share shame opinion obviously, so I wouldn't take offense. Anyway, to the point Have you looked into the web editing features built into Mozilla? I remember HotMetal... last one I used was Dreamweaver. There seems to be many ways to run Dreamweaver on Linux. (Wine, Crossover) Check out these links. http://www.execulink.com/~cboden/dwlin/ http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum40/697.htm http://www.dmxzone.com/ShowDetail.asp?NewsId=5794 I am forced to use Windows for releasing some of our software on that platform. I still do everything under Linux. Only compile and test on the Windoze box (through VNC) Anyway, B-) On Wednesday 09 February 2005 03:14 pm, Ted Hilts wrote:
Randall
You are correct, it is an "in progress" transition that is very hard to accomplish. As an example, I use a (windows only) web authoring tool called HotMetal Pro V6 on 3 MS XP machines and 1 Win95 machine. It was the last version of this web authoring tool some 2 years ago. It is a true and easy to use WYSIWYG web authoring tool with advanced features. I have been looking, as time permits for a reasonably close product for Linux and failing that for Windows but in these 2 years have found nothing so far that even comes close. I am currently looking at a Linux web authoring tool that comes with the SuSE distribution. I use many other software tools that even several years old still out perform what I can find on Linux. I encourage vendors towards a Linux solution and they ignore me.
I like SuSe. You have no reason to be hostile with me about the fact that my email is Netscape based. I use Netscape on Windows because it is all I know but I am investigating using Mozilla mail on Linux and simply have not had the time. I don't know everything about everything. My work requires research and knowledge in many fields of many things leaving me little time to become a 100% Linux guru. Computers and sofware products are only a very small part of my work.
But I like SuSE. I like Linux. And I'm trying to like you guys. I have 6 linux machines on my LAN and one of them is Slackware, another is Red Hat, another is both Red Hat and SuSE, another is BSD and SuSE, and the remainder are all pure SuSE. Some of these 6 have also dual boot with Windows which is rarely used on these machine but is there anyway.
I have 8 pure Windows machines 2 of which are XP and 1 is XP Pro. I don't like XP as it is full of flakey behaviors that can trash an entire directory and pause the complete system for a screen refesh and numerable other flakey things. I think Bill Gates not only over charges for the MS Operating systems but has also practiced and got away with numerous efforts at monopolizing computer software and techniques and technologies in general. In addition, by all reports I've heard he is a ruthless "money is the bottom line" business man. I would only repect him as a human being if he gave 50% of his net worth to a good cause. Unfortunately most of the world treats him as a "business Saint" worthy of their worship and admiration. I think that the MS Operating Systems started as a piece of junk and are still not worth the cost. I blame "Big Business", in this case "Big Software Business enterprises" for being stupid and money hungry to the point that if they really cared for excellence we would have by now all the products I need to do my work and in a Linux environment.
Before I retired, I worked in Engineering and IT (Information Technology) and they thought I was crackers because of my interests and advocacy of Linux. Since then IBM (one of our (the company I worked for) main computer/software sources) has "seen the light" as well as the "financial gains" associated with Linux and appear rapidly to be turning Linux into a very expensive proposition when integrated with their product line as well as forcing Linux vendors like SuSE to compete.
Thanks - Ted
Randall R Schulz wrote:
Patrick,
and *you* continue to use the root cause of all these problems to operate your computer. Please, take a bow. You have reached the pinnacle.
The Monday 2005-02-07 at 17:19 -0700, Ted Hilts wrote:
Sorry for the reposting. There were 5 different posts at the same time and all 5 got reposted by accident. I've had major email problems now for about a year. I get about 20 worms a day disguised as warnings coming from the US government and returned e-mail advisories coming at me from all over the place. It also seems like I'm the target of a dozen or so sexually perverted sources. All this stuff comes at me with an imbedded worm of one sort or another.
So do we all, but most of us use a good umbrella: Linux ;-) I get dozens of those emails. Windows worms can't damage me, and almost all spam is catched by SpamAssassin. Viruses are filtered by amavis, so I don't see them, unless I want to. -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
Carlos I will see what I can do regarding these 2 Linux packages but first my email will have to be moved over to a Linux machine. Currently I use a Windows 95 machine to bring in the email from my email account on a USA server and then through my ISP to this Win 95 machine. This way I am not using a production machine on my LAN and if the Win 95 machine blows up because of a virus then no major harm done. On the Win95 machine I isolate the contaminated email files and clean up the email files. When the Win 95 machine is clean I (via shares) move the email to a clean XP Pro production machine to be read and redistributed into appropriate files. I send email from either machine. I use Proland's Protector Plus anti virus and used to use Norton. The Worms crawl through both of these Anti-Virus packages not even detected by Norton. Apparently Proland does not feel that they should adjust their package to either quarantine or remove the virus and insist that I must manually identify the virus, delete the file, and take other measures to clean up the inbox and trash files. They say this is the only way to deal with worms. So I run Protector Plus from XP Pro to identify the worms on Win 95 and then clean up Win 95. All this is a lot of work and time consuming and one of the reasons why I am slow responding with my email. I get a lot of email and I can't do any other email activity, like reading email, or responding to email, until all the incoming email has been loaded otherwise Win95 crashes. I get a lot of email every day and my gateways work through slow dial up lines as I am located in a rural area of Alberta, Canada and there are no other alternatives available to me. Once I am able to find the time to create a Linux email account and implement the Anti-Virus and Anti-Spam everyone has been talking to me about then I will take this Win95 machine and make it a dual boot and run a Linux email set up. As I mentioned in another email to the list, I think I will start with a Mozilla Linux email account and then move on to Sendmail or some other Linux package. But I cannot do this right away. Carlos E. R. wrote:
I get dozens of those emails. Windows worms can't damage me, and almost all spam is catched by SpamAssassin. Viruses are filtered by amavis, so I don't see them, unless I want to.
The Wednesday 2005-02-09 at 16:04 -0700, Ted Hilts wrote: Ah, I saw first your private answer, I see you forwarded it later to the list. Therefore, I post here my answer as well.
Carlos I will see what I can do regarding these 2 Linux packages but first my email will have to be moved over to a Linux machine. Currently I use a Windows 95 machine to bring in the email from my email account on a USA server and then through my ISP to this Win 95 machine. This way I am not using a production machine on my LAN and if the Win 95 machine blows up because of a virus then no major harm done. On the Win95 machine I isolate the contaminated email files and clean up the email files. When the Win 95 machine is clean I (via shares) move the email to a clean XP Pro production machine to be read and redistributed into appropriate files. I send email from either machine.
Slow process... probably safe, specially if the W95 machine is not networked to the rest.
I use Proland's Protector Plus anti virus and used to use Norton. The Worms crawl through both of these Anti-Virus packages not even detected by Norton. Apparently Proland does not feel that they should adjust their package to either quarantine or remove the virus and insist that I must manually identify the virus, delete the file, and take other measures to clean up the inbox and trash files. They say this is the only way to deal with worms.
It is probably true about new, unknown worms or viruses. On the other hand, you may simply reject every email with any kind of executable content, whatever it is. At most, delete the content and inform you. If it comes from somebody you know, then spank him :-p That is what amavis does, by default. It does not care to see if it is a virus. Is it a windows executable, even in disguise? Delete it, ask questions later. No antivirus needed. Of course, you may add an antivirus.
So I run Protector Plus from XP Pro to identify the worms on Win 95 and then clean up Win 95.
You should keep an image on CD. If the machine is compromised, simply reformat and reinstall from image. Ghost is a program that does it. You have it back as new inside 30 minutes.
All this is a lot of work and time consuming and one of the reasons why I am slow responding with my email. I get a lot of email and I can't do any other email activity, like reading email, or responding to email, until all the incoming email has been loaded otherwise Win95 crashes. I get a lot of email every day and my gateways work through slow dial up lines as I am located in a rural area of Alberta, Canada and there are no other alternatives available to me.
Yes, I also use dial up.
Once I am able to find the time to create a Linux email account and implement the Anti-Virus and Anti-Spam everyone has been talking to me about then I will take this Win95 machine and make it a dual boot and run a Linux email set up. As I mentioned in another email to the list, I think I will start with a Mozilla Linux email account and then move on to Sendmail or some other Linux package. But I cannot do this right away.
Frankly, I don't know what I would do if I had to use windows. In fact, I have a relative in Ottawa, and I have lost email contact with her because her windows machine dies soon after connecting. Some kind of cable or adsl ISP, I suppose. And as she knows very little about computers, I can't do nothing from here, except recommend hire some kind of maintenance service, buy a firewall, I don't know. But I understand there are accounts that do some anti-spam filtering, also virus checking. Tiscali does for a fee. Or the ieee remailer does for free. Surely there are more. Gmail I hear does some. But certainly, downloading email on a Linux machine is pretty safe. Maybe sometime an attack will be developed (beware of html email!), but so far, I have seen none. However, if you intend to see those emails on a windows machine without handling, then the windows machine is at risk, unless you use some of the Linux tools to clean it - like amavis. In Linux I can open and view virus loaded email with a quiet mind - for two reasons: Linux email clients do not automatically execute attachments, and windows executables are not so in Linux (unless you work under wine). -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
* Ted Hilts
Once I am able to find the time to create a Linux email account and implement the Anti-Virus and Anti-Spam everyone has been talking to me about then
a very minor effort which, according to your maladies, would definitely be warranted and time-saving, and much safer. And there is little to no need for "Anti-Virus" protection for the linux enviroment.
I will take this Win95 machine and make it a dual boot and run a Linux email set up. As I mentioned in another email to the list, I think I will start with a Mozilla Linux email account and then move on to Sendmail or some other Linux package. But I cannot do this right away.
"right away" would pay dividends within a *day*. And please, do something with your *quoting*. http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos
The Wednesday 2005-02-09 at 20:18 -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I will take this Win95 machine and make it a dual boot and run a Linux email set up. As I mentioned in another email to the list, I think I will start with a Mozilla Linux email account and then move on to Sendmail or some other Linux package. But I cannot do this right away.
"right away" would pay dividends within a *day*.
I agree. And, after all, setting up Netscape in windows or mozilla in linux is equivalent. It is even possible to share files among both. -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
participants (12)
-
Brad Bourn
-
Carlos E. R.
-
David Robertson
-
Greg Freemyer
-
Jerry Westrick
-
Mike
-
Patrick Shanahan
-
Philipp Thomas
-
Randall J. Parr
-
Randall R Schulz
-
Ted Hilts
-
Theo v. Werkhoven