RE:[SLE] Shameless plug: Vote for SuSE (Abuesd?! How so?)

29 Jun 2000

...
There were more than 200 votes this morning and SuSE had more than 50% 
of the votes.
They've reset the voters counter and removed the SuSE option. What the 
hell kind of web site is that?
My sentiments exactly.  Perhaps they're thinking that Lenz 'abused' the poll
by asking the list to vote for it.  I don't really think so - if we didn't
like the SuSE distribution best, we probably wouldn't have even bothered to
check that site out (or join the list, for that matter).

Perhaps they really _are_ sponsored by RH, or someone there just felt a bit
like whining...

There, I've said it.

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2651.75">
<TITLE>RE:[SLE] Shameless plug: Vote for SuSE (Abuesd?! How so?)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

> There were more than 200 votes this morning and SuSE had more than 50% 
> of the votes. 
> 
> They've reset the voters counter and removed the SuSE option. What the 
> hell kind of web site is that?

My sentiments exactly. Perhaps they're thinking that Lenz 'abused' the poll by asking the list to vote for it. I don't really think so - if we didn't like the SuSE distribution best, we probably wouldn't have even bothered to check that site out (or join the list, for that matter).

<FONT SIZE=2>Perhaps they really _are_ sponsored by RH, or someone there just felt a bit like whining...</FONT>
</P>

<FONT SIZE=2>There, I've said it.</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>

crogers＠eGain.com

tags

participants (1)