* Ronald Wiplinger <ronald@elmit.com> [04-08-06 11:47]:

My son, 13 years old, likes to play on-line game. For the sake of the school, I have to limit it. If I just ask him to turn off the computer, he will certainly tell me that he needs the computer for school.

I would like to trick the dns!!! I want to update the dns for his computer for certain hours to access the on-line game or not.

Dynamic DNS would be something I could imagine would work.

I believe that you are looking in the wrong area. As I understand and employ, dynamic dns means that the ip number of your computer/connection is not static, does not stay the same. It changes as your provider directs. dns in this case is to identify *your* computer. You might be more interested in utilizing a proxy such as snort to controll access to particular sites. Whether you can do this by the clock time, I do not know. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2

On Saturday 08 April 2006 16:44, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:

My son, 13 years old, likes to play on-line game. For the sake of the school, I have to limit it. If I just ask him to turn off the computer, he will certainly tell me that he needs the computer for school.

Then he wins.

I would like to trick the dns!!! I want to update the dns for his computer for certain hours to access the on-line game or not.

Dynamic DNS would be something I could imagine would work.

From the dns log I know which destinations he need. I want to divert these destination to a certain web site (if it access a web site). Or make a bandwidth restriction to certain hours would be another choice.

My concern is, that only the games are restricted, but not any web site he might need for school. I want to make this on the server! Any ideas?

Avoid this approach. OK, this is a Linux list and the reasons for avoiding this approach are probably off topic, but in essence you are putting yourself in a position of controlling someone who is becoming an adult and who needs to learn to control himself. By constraining what is possible, you are teaching that anything which is possible is permissible. That's a bad lesson, and you should be prepared to sacrifice all the schoolwork in the world to avoid teaching it. It's a familiar question, and you are a good deal more open about it than many - I have several times seen it, without a child being mentioned, and someone replies and mentions 'your child' - at which other posters say 'what child' - and then it turns out to be a child who is being controlled, sometimes a 17 year old. And then the thread goes sour, when someone says 'perhaps you should not try to exercise control in this way' and the original poster says 'who the hell are you to tell me how to bring up my child?' At 13, you might think it is appropriate to do control by technical means, but then you will need an exit strategy over the next few years during which you will be working through all the things you need to work through now, only a few years late, with a more resentful son. Or you could let him leave home, go to college at 19, never having exited from this control at home, and he will not have learned self discipline, with predictably bad consequences.