More mad bounces from list member (gbrown from unionavenue stop com)
Hi,
I wouldn't mention this, but as nobody else commented on it, I thought that
perhaps it could be only me, and the rest of you have a configuration that
rejects them. Is one of those bounces from a lister with a misconfigured
postfix from days (weeks?) ago.
Anyway. I copy here the important parts of the bounce; I would like to
reject it in postfix. But how?
Return-Path: <> --> this is the envelope from,
impossible to reject.
...
Received: from mail.aculink.net (65.173.158.7) by netmail.tiscalinet.es (6.7.021.1)
id 426E55CC001473B4 for *; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:18:38 +0200
Received: from linux.local ([204.118.157.51])
by mail.aculink.net (Merak 6.2.1) with ESMTP id EDA37003
for
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 13:41 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Hi,
I wouldn't mention this, but as nobody else commented on it, I thought that perhaps it could be only me, and the rest of you have a configuration that rejects them. Is one of those bounces from a lister with a misconfigured postfix from days (weeks?) ago.
Anyway. I copy here the important parts of the bounce; I would like to reject it in postfix. But how?
Return-Path: <> --> this is the envelope from, impossible to reject. ... Received: from mail.aculink.net (65.173.158.7) by netmail.tiscalinet.es (6.7.021.1) id 426E55CC001473B4 for *; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:18:38 +0200 Received: from linux.local ([204.118.157.51]) by mail.aculink.net (Merak 6.2.1) with ESMTP id EDA37003 for
; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:18:31 -0600 <snip>
I sent the headers to abuse@aculink.net in hopes that they will track down this idiot and force him to either turn off his email server or fix it. I included other dates and times with the IP address used then. Perhaps if more of us do so it will get his attention. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge
The Thursday 2005-05-12 at 08:09 -0400, Ken Schneider wrote:
I sent the headers to abuse@aculink.net in hopes that they will track down this idiot and force him to either turn off his email server or fix it. I included other dates and times with the IP address used then. Perhaps if more of us do so it will get his attention.
I have had no response from "abuse" addresses previously, so I didn't. But I did post directly to the user a copy of my previous email to the list. Let us see. :-} -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Thursday 2005-05-12 at 08:09 -0400, Ken Schneider wrote:
I sent the headers to abuse@aculink.net in hopes that they will track down this idiot and force him to either turn off his email server or fix it. I included other dates and times with the IP address used then. Perhaps if more of us do so it will get his attention.
I have had no response from "abuse" addresses previously, so I didn't. But I did post directly to the user a copy of my previous email to the list.
Let us see. :-}
I thought it particularly kind of the dude to let us all know that his virus scanner is not installed (yeah, right). The moron is bouncing the list back to the originator, not to the return-path address. Try sending your complaints to the list owner.
The Thursday 2005-05-12 at 21:31 -0600, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
The moron is bouncing the list back to the originator, not to the return-path address. Try sending your complaints to the list owner.
Useless, I think. They originated ten days ago or roundabouts -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
participants (3)
-
Carlos E. R.
-
Darryl Gregorash
-
Ken Schneider