Re: [opensuse] openSUSE Router with IPV6
On 2019-08-20 01:05 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Could it be that he will never get them, and has to use always private addresses on the inside? Same as if he were using NAT. The ISP doesn't want his internal machines to be directly adressable from outside.
No, the problem is openSUSE does not appear to support DHCPv6-PD, which is needed to use it as a router with most ISPs. I have a block of 2^72 addresses from my ISP. Any I use within that range will be accessible from outside. There is another type of address, called Unique Local Addresses, which are not accessible from elsewhere, though they are routeable, just like RFC1918 addresses on IPv4. Also, NAT is a hack, to get around the IPv4 address shortage, so there's no need for it on IPv6. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1908201923260.12608@Telcontar.valinor> On Tuesday, 2019-08-20 at 13:13 -0400, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-20 01:05 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Did I mail you privately? I don't see my own post on the list. My mistake then.
Could it be that he will never get them, and has to use always private addresses on the inside? Same as if he were using NAT. The ISP doesn't want his internal machines to be directly adressable from outside.
No, the problem is openSUSE does not appear to support DHCPv6-PD, which is needed to use it as a router with most ISPs. I have a block of 2^72 addresses from my ISP. Any I use within that range will be accessible from outside. There is another type of address, called Unique Local Addresses, which are not accessible from elsewhere, though they are routeable, just like RFC1918 addresses on IPv4. Also, NAT is a hack, to get around the IPv4 address shortage, so there's no need for it on IPv6.
I meant that maybe his provider wants him to use Unique Local Addresses. But it can be what you say. Would the inside prefix he is supposed to get be registered on the log, somehow? - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHoEARECADoWIQQZEb51mJKK1KpcU/W1MxgcbY1H1QUCXVwtWBwccm9iaW4ubGlz dGFzQHRlbGVmb25pY2EubmV0AAoJELUzGBxtjUfVwpMAn3543z3NGiTmhEGXJxYr JdKjxsMIAKCT3DkxcTSPwhJ6Au3sN/9fUHBmng== =brYf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 2019-08-20 01:26 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Did I mail you privately? I don't see my own post on the list. My mistake then.
No, I sent it to the list, as the info may be useful for others.
I meant that maybe his provider wants him to use Unique Local Addresses. But it can be what you say.
The ISP would not expect a user to use NAT. NAT is a hack to get around the IPv4 address shortage. Unfortunately, it's become so common that many think it's the normal way of doing things. It's become a curse, as it breaks things.
Would the inside prefix he is supposed to get be registered on the log, somehow?
Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 13:31 -0400, James Knott wrote:
Would the inside prefix he is supposed to get be registered on the log, somehow?
Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file.
The only DUID file I could find is: /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml cat /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml <duid>00:01:00:01:24:c8:93:1d:00:1e:06:36:93:44</duid> Here is what the journal shows: c2router:~ # systemctl restart wicked c2router:~ # journalctl --since 13:21 -- Logs begin at Mon 2019-07-22 10:30:11 CDT, end at Tue 2019-08-20 13:21:43 CDT. -- Aug 20 13:21:27 c2router systemd[1]: Stopping wicked managed network interfaces... Aug 20 13:21:27 c2router wickedd-dhcp4[874]: eth1: Request to release DHCPv4 lease with UUID 9bd6355d-11e7-0100-7c03-000006000000: releasing... Aug 20 13:21:27 c2router wickedd-dhcp6[862]: eth1: Request to release DHCPv6 lease using UUID 9bd6355d-11e7-0100-7c03-000007000000: releasing... Aug 20 13:21:30 c2router kernel: meson8b-dwmac c9410000.ethernet eth1: Link is Down Aug 20 13:21:36 c2router kernel: RTL8211F Gigabit Ethernet stmmac-0:00: attached PHY driver [RTL8211F Gigabit Ethernet] (mii_bus:phy_addr=stmmac-0:00, irq=35) Aug 20 13:21:36 c2router kernel: meson8b-dwmac c9410000.ethernet eth1: No Safety Features support found Aug 20 13:21:36 c2router kernel: meson8b-dwmac c9410000.ethernet eth1: PTP not supported by HW Aug 20 13:21:38 c2router kernel: meson8b-dwmac c9410000.ethernet eth1: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control off Aug 20 13:21:38 c2router kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth1: link becomes ready Aug 20 13:21:38 c2router wickedd-dhcp4[874]: eth1: Request to acquire DHCPv4 lease with UUID 9bd6355d-11e7-0100-7c03-000012000000 Aug 20 13:21:38 c2router wickedd-dhcp6[862]: eth1: Request to acquire DHCPv6 lease with UUID 9bd6355d-11e7-0100-7c03-000013000000 in mode auto Aug 20 13:21:39 c2router wickedd-dhcp4[874]: eth1: Committed DHCPv4 lease with address 75.xxx.253.3 (lease time 58521 sec, renew in 29260 sec, rebind in 51205 sec) Aug 20 13:21:40 c2router wickedd-dhcp6[862]: eth1: link confirmation in reply with status All on link! Aug 20 13:21:40 c2router wickedd-dhcp6[862]: eth1: Committed DHCPv6 lease with addresses: Aug 20 13:21:40 c2router wickedd- dhcp6[862]: 2605:xxxx:afc0:2:ed44:6b09:12ab:2754, pref-lft 604800, valid-lft 604800 Aug 20 13:21:43 c2router wicked[7414]: lo up Aug 20 13:21:43 c2router wicked[7414]: eth0 up Aug 20 13:21:43 c2router wicked[7414]: eth1 up Aug 20 13:21:43 c2router systemd[1]: Started wicked managed network interfaces. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2019-08-20 02:29 PM, Mark Petersen wrote:
Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file.
The only DUID file I could find is: /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml cat /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml <duid>00:01:00:01:24:c8:93:1d:00:1e:06:36:93:44</duid>
Without proper DHCPv6-PD support, you're wasting your time. Part of the PD involves requesting the prefix and how bit it's supposed to be. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 21/08/2019 14:51, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-20 02:29 PM, Mark Petersen wrote:
Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file.
The only DUID file I could find is: /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml cat /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml <duid>00:01:00:01:24:c8:93:1d:00:1e:06:36:93:44</duid> Without proper DHCPv6-PD support, you're wasting your time. Part of the PD involves requesting the prefix and how bit it's supposed to be.
Sorry for not following closely the thread, but you can have Prefix Delegation. https://taczanowski.net/linux-box-as-an-ipv6-router-with-slaac-and-dhcpv6-pd... Is mandatory to use wicked? N�����r��y隊Z)z{.�ﮞ˛���m�)z{.��+�: �{Zr�az�'z��j)h���Ǿ� ޮ�^�ˬz��
Antonio Ojea Garcia wrote:
On 21/08/2019 14:51, James Knott wrote:
Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file.
The only DUID file I could find is: /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml cat /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml <duid>00:01:00:01:24:c8:93:1d:00:1e:06:36:93:44</duid> Without proper DHCPv6-PD support, you're wasting your time. Part of
On 2019-08-20 02:29 PM, Mark Petersen wrote: the PD involves requesting the prefix and how bit it's supposed to be.
Sorry for not following closely the thread, but you can have Prefix Delegation.
https://taczanowski.net/linux-box-as-an-ipv6-router-with-slaac-and-dhcpv6-pd...
Yes, this is the link Mark started with, but it's using wide-dhcpv6 which isn't currently built for openSUSE. I think Mark could likely build it himself.
Is mandatory to use wicked?
Probably not, Andrei also mentioned that NetworkManager does PD. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (19.3°C) http://www.cloudsuisse.com/ - your owncloud, hosted in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 16:33 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Antonio Ojea Garcia wrote:
On 21/08/2019 14:51, James Knott wrote:
Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file.
The only DUID file I could find is: /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml cat /var/lib/wicked/duid.xml <duid>00:01:00:01:24:c8:93:1d:00:1e:06:36:93:44</duid
Without proper DHCPv6-PD support, you're wasting your time. Part of
On 2019-08-20 02:29 PM, Mark Petersen wrote: the PD involves requesting the prefix and how bit it's supposed to be.
Sorry for not following closely the thread, but you can have Prefix Delegation.
https://taczanowski.net/linux-box-as-an-ipv6-router-with-slaac-and-dhcpv6-pd...
Yes, this is the link Mark started with, but it's using wide-dhcpv6 which isn't currently built for openSUSE. I think Mark could likely build it himself.
Is mandatory to use wicked?
Probably not, Andrei also mentioned that NetworkManager does PD.
-- Per Jessen, Zürich (19.3°C) http://www.cloudsuisse.com/ - your owncloud, hosted in Switzerland.
So, I attempted to compile wide-dhcpv6-client, but I got an error during make: ./common.h:158:13: error: conflicting types for ‘dprintf’ While searching the internet for a solution to this error I found something that looks promising: dibbler I'm currently reading through the example documents, and so far I've been able to get an ipv6 address and a prefix-delegation. # dibbler-client run | Dibbler - a portable DHCPv6, version 1.0.1 (CLIENT, Linux port) | Authors : Tomasz Mrugalski<thomson(at)klub.com.pl>,Marek Senderski<msend(at)o2.pl> | Licence : GNU GPL v2 only. Developed at Gdansk University of Technology. | Homepage: http://klub.com.pl/dhcpv6/ 2019.08.21 19:26:39 Client Notice My pid (12409) is stored in /var/lib/dibbler/client.pid 2019.08.21 19:26:39 Client Notice Detected iface eth1/3, MAC=00:1e:06:36:93:44. 2019.08.21 19:26:39 Client Notice Detected iface eth0/2, MAC=e8:fc:af:c7:a8:21. 2019.08.21 19:26:39 Client Notice Detected iface lo/1, MAC=00:00:00:00:00:00. 2019.08.21 19:26:39 Client Notice Parsing /etc/dibbler/client.conf config file... 26:39 Client Info Interface eth1/3 configuration has been loaded. 26:39 Client Info My DUID is 00:01:00:01:24:f0:9b:55:00:1e:06:36:93:44. 26:39 Client Info Loading old address database (client- AddrMgr.xml), using built-in routines. 26:39 Client Info DB timestamp:1566433257, now()=1566433599, db is 342 second(s) old. 26:39 Client Info All client's 00:01:00:01:24:f0:9b:55:00:1e:06:36:93:44 leases are not valid. 26:39 Client Notice Creating control (::) socket on the lo/1 interface. 26:39 Client Notice Creating socket (addr=fe80::21e:6ff:fe36:9344) on eth1/3 interface. 26:39 Client Notice CONFIRM support compiled in. 26:39 Client Info Creating SOLICIT message with 1 IA(s), no TA and 1 PD(s) on eth1/3 interface. 26:39 Client Info Received ADVERTISE on eth1/3,trans-id=0xa4efe5, 5 opts: 1 2 3 25 7 26:40 Client Info Processing msg (SOLICIT,transID=0xa4efe5,opts: 1 3 25 8) 26:40 Client Info Creating REQUEST. Backup server list contains 1 server(s). 26:40 Client Info Received ADVERTISE on eth1/3,trans-id=0xa4efe5, 5 opts: 1 2 3 25 7 26:40 Client Warning Message with wrong transID (0xa4efe5) received. Ignoring. 26:40 Client Info Received REPLY on eth1/3,trans-id=0xd43e71, 4 opts: 1 2 3 25 26:40 Client Notice Address 2605:xxxx:afc0:2:9d1b:aa78:6ccf:89a4/128 added to eth1/3 interface. 26:40 Client Notice PD: Adding prefix 2605:xxxx:1500:a0c4::/64 to all interfaces (prefix will be split to /72 prefixes if necessary). 26:40 Client Info PD: Using 1 suitable interface(s):eth0 26:40 Client Notice PD: Adding prefix 2605:xxxx:1500:a0c4::/64 on the eth0/2 interface. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Mark Petersen wrote:
So, I attempted to compile wide-dhcpv6-client, but I got an error during make: ./common.h:158:13: error: conflicting types for ‘dprintf’
While searching the internet for a solution to this error I found something that looks promising: dibbler
Nice, amazing what the internet will come up with :-) I googled for 'dibbler", the first mention of _this_ dibbler was on page 4 .... -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.4°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 8/22/19 7:31 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Mark Petersen wrote:
So, I attempted to compile wide-dhcpv6-client, but I got an error during make: ./common.h:158:13: error: conflicting types for ‘dprintf’
While searching the internet for a solution to this error I found something that looks promising: dibbler
Nice, amazing what the internet will come up with :-)
I googled for 'dibbler", the first mention of _this_ dibbler was on page 4 ....
Yeah, dibbler should work, actually, dibbler is the default driver for Prefix Delegation in Openstack https://docs.openstack.org/newton/networking-guide/config-ipv6.html#prefix-d...
On 2019-08-21 08:38 PM, Mark Petersen wrote:
While searching the internet for a solution to this error I found something that looks promising: dibbler
Hi Mark. I don't know what the issue is, but for some reasons all your messages wind up in the spam folder. Generally the first I see of them is when someone else replies to you. I then check the spam folder and find your message. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 06:52:33 -0400 James Knott <james.knott@jknott.net> wrote:
On 2019-08-21 08:38 PM, Mark Petersen wrote:
While searching the internet for a solution to this error I found something that looks promising: dibbler
Hi Mark.
I don't know what the issue is, but for some reasons all your messages wind up in the spam folder. Generally the first I see of them is when someone else replies to you. I then check the spam folder and find your message.
I don't see any problem with Mark's messages here, so I suppose the problem is with your spam filter. Perhaps try retraining it? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 06:52 -0400, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-21 08:38 PM, Mark Petersen wrote:
While searching the internet for a solution to this error I found something that looks promising: dibbler
Hi Mark.
I don't know what the issue is, but for some reasons all your messages wind up in the spam folder. Generally the first I see of them is when someone else replies to you. I then check the spam folder and find your message.
I run my mail server running on a Linode VPS and I have spf, dmarc, and dkim all setup, so I'm not sure why my emails would be ending up in your spam folder. - Maybe check the headers. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 22/08/2019 14.37, Mark Petersen wrote:
On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 06:52 -0400, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-21 08:38 PM, Mark Petersen wrote:
While searching the internet for a solution to this error I found something that looks promising: dibbler
Hi Mark.
I don't know what the issue is, but for some reasons all your messages wind up in the spam folder. Generally the first I see of them is when someone else replies to you. I then check the spam folder and find your message.
I run my mail server running on a Linode VPS and I have spf, dmarc, and dkim all setup, so I'm not sure why my emails would be ending up in your spam folder. - Maybe check the headers.
Right, the headers should say what is triggering it. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On 2019-08-22 08:37 AM, Mark Petersen wrote:
I run my mail server running on a Linode VPS and I have spf, dmarc, and dkim all setup, so I'm not sure why my emails would be ending up in your spam folder. - Maybe check the headers.
What am I looking for? BTW, I found this message in spam too. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 22/08/2019 15.01, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-22 08:37 AM, Mark Petersen wrote:
I run my mail server running on a Linode VPS and I have spf, dmarc, and dkim all setup, so I'm not sure why my emails would be ending up in your spam folder. - Maybe check the headers.
What am I looking for?
BTW, I found this message in spam too.
Headers with word "spam" and nearby, for starters. If you are using Thunderbird, just press "ctrl-u" and look around. Example: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at localhost X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-TnetIn-SenderInfo: IP: .... | Country: DE | SPF: none X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020F.5D5E8C9E.001A:SCGMA358798,ss=1,re=-4.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=1024 X-CTCH-Score: -4.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-TnetIn-Information: AntiSPAM and AntiVIRUS on asavin01 X-TnetIn-MsgID: 46DkZk0NFNzwQCV.A7E14 X-TnetIn-SpamCheck: no es spam, -4, Unknown X-TnetIn-From: opensuse+bounces-219961-... X-Spam-Status: No -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar)
Here's what I get, when I search on spam: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled What's curious is the message isn't actually shown as spam. It's just in the spam folder. This is with Seamonkey v2.49.4. On 2019-08-22 09:27 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 22/08/2019 15.01, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-22 08:37 AM, Mark Petersen wrote:
I run my mail server running on a Linode VPS and I have spf, dmarc, and dkim all setup, so I'm not sure why my emails would be ending up in your spam folder. - Maybe check the headers. What am I looking for?
BTW, I found this message in spam too. Headers with word "spam" and nearby, for starters. If you are using Thunderbird, just press "ctrl-u" and look around.
Example:
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at localhost X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level:
X-TnetIn-SenderInfo: IP: .... | Country: DE | SPF: none X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020F.5D5E8C9E.001A:SCGMA358798,ss=1,re=-4.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=1024 X-CTCH-Score: -4.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-TnetIn-Information: AntiSPAM and AntiVIRUS on asavin01 X-TnetIn-MsgID: 46DkZk0NFNzwQCV.A7E14 X-TnetIn-SpamCheck: no es spam, -4, Unknown X-TnetIn-From: opensuse+bounces-219961-... X-Spam-Status: No
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 22/08/2019 15.41, James Knott wrote:
Here's what I get, when I search on spam:
X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled
That was written by the opensuse.org server, so that is not the one. Look more :-)
What's curious is the message isn't actually shown as spam. It's just in the spam folder. This is with Seamonkey v2.49.4.
That means it was done by your ISP. Select them and mark them as not spam (I know that they are already not marked as spam). That should trigger moving back to the inbox folder, and should tell the ISP to unlearn those posts. Ie, train your ISP filter. Do not "move" the posts manually. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On 2019-08-22 09:52 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 22/08/2019 15.41, James Knott wrote:
Here's what I get, when I search on spam:
X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled That was written by the opensuse.org server, so that is not the one. Look more :-)
I searched through the headers and those are the only occurrences of spam in the header. Further searching only turns up where it's being discussed in the body. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 22/08/2019 15.56, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-22 09:52 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 22/08/2019 15.41, James Knott wrote:
Here's what I get, when I search on spam:
X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled That was written by the opensuse.org server, so that is not the one. Look more :-)
I searched through the headers and those are the only occurrences of spam in the header. Further searching only turns up where it's being discussed in the body.
If you wish, you can send me a sample off list. Select one of his, menu message, forward as attachment (if it is in the same place as in Thunderbird). -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On 2019-08-22 15:59, Carlos E.R. wrote:
If you wish, you can send me a sample off list. Select one of his, menu message, forward as attachment (if it is in the same place as in Thunderbird).
Or just post the headers of the mail to https://paste.opensuse.org with a short TTL (delete after, lets say, 1h or something like that) and tick the box "private" so that the people that want to help can do that. Cheers, -- /bengan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 22/08/2019 15.59, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 22/08/2019 15.56, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-22 09:52 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 22/08/2019 15.41, James Knott wrote:
Here's what I get, when I search on spam:
X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled That was written by the opensuse.org server, so that is not the one. Look more :-)
I searched through the headers and those are the only occurrences of spam in the header. Further searching only turns up where it's being discussed in the body.
If you wish, you can send me a sample off list. Select one of his, menu message, forward as attachment (if it is in the same place as in Thunderbird).
One: ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@markofall.com header.s=2018030801 header.b=LNe0st45; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of opensuse+bounces-219961-... designates 195.... as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="opensuse+bounces-219961-..."; dmarc=fail (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=QUARANTINE) header.from=markofall.com It fails "dmark", and dkim is neutral. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC> p=reject is a policy. Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC#Reports>: «In April 2014, Yahoo changed its DMARC policy to p=reject, thereby causing misbehavior in several mailing lists.[17] A few days later, AOL also changed its DMARC policy to p=reject.[18] Those moves resulted in a significant amount of disruption, and those mailbox providers have been accused of forcing the costs of their own security failures onto third parties.[19]» It could be that. Still, there are no other clear marks from your ISP spam classification. I would try do as I said before: mark them as not spam while they are in the spam folder. This action tells the ISP to learn they are not spam. At least, it is working with GMX here. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On 2019-08-22 10:15 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
It fails "dmark", and dkim is neutral.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC>
p=reject is a policy.
Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC#Reports>:
«In April 2014, Yahoo changed its DMARC policy to p=reject, thereby causing misbehavior in several mailing lists.[17] A few days later, AOL also changed its DMARC policy to p=reject.[18] Those moves resulted in a significant amount of disruption, and those mailbox providers have been accused of forcing the costs of their own security failures onto third parties.[19]»
It could be that.
Still, there are no other clear marks from your ISP spam classification.
I would try do as I said before: mark them as not spam while they are in the spam folder. This action tells the ISP to learn they are not spam. At least, it is working with GMX here.
My email is handled by Google, though with my own domain name. I'll have to check the web mail, next time it happens. As I mentioned earlier, it's not marked spam, it's just in the spam folder. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 22/08/2019 16.19, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-22 10:15 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
...
I would try do as I said before: mark them as not spam while they are in the spam folder. This action tells the ISP to learn they are not spam. At least, it is working with GMX here.
My email is handled by Google, though with my own domain name. I'll have to check the web mail, next time it happens. As I mentioned earlier, it's not marked spam, it's just in the spam folder.
As long as you are using imap, just go to the message menu, mark, not junk. In thunderbird, shift-J. No matter if it is flagged already or not. This action automatically moves the mail to the inbox and trains the ISP. Google is very good at this. If you are using pop, then either switch to imap, of use the webmail page to do the same thing. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On 2019-08-22 10:40 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 22/08/2019 16.19, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-22 10:15 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: ...
I would try do as I said before: mark them as not spam while they are in the spam folder. This action tells the ISP to learn they are not spam. At least, it is working with GMX here. My email is handled by Google, though with my own domain name. I'll have to check the web mail, next time it happens. As I mentioned earlier, it's not marked spam, it's just in the spam folder. As long as you are using imap, just go to the message menu, mark, not junk. In thunderbird, shift-J. No matter if it is flagged already or not. This action automatically moves the mail to the inbox and trains the ISP. Google is very good at this.
If you are using pop, then either switch to imap, of use the webmail page to do the same thing.
I use IMAP. Regardless, I'll have to wait for Mark to send some more messages. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 22/08/2019 16.42, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-22 10:40 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 22/08/2019 16.19, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-22 10:15 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: ...
I would try do as I said before: mark them as not spam while they are in the spam folder. This action tells the ISP to learn they are not spam. At least, it is working with GMX here. My email is handled by Google, though with my own domain name. I'll have to check the web mail, next time it happens. As I mentioned earlier, it's not marked spam, it's just in the spam folder. As long as you are using imap, just go to the message menu, mark, not junk. In thunderbird, shift-J. No matter if it is flagged already or not. This action automatically moves the mail to the inbox and trains the ISP. Google is very good at this.
If you are using pop, then either switch to imap, of use the webmail page to do the same thing.
I use IMAP. Regardless, I'll have to wait for Mark to send some more messages.
Select many of his posts, move to junk folder. Go to junk folder, then mark as not junk. :-D -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On 20/08/2019 19.31, James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-20 01:26 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Did I mail you privately? I don't see my own post on the list. My mistake then.
No, I sent it to the list, as the info may be useful for others.
Sure. My question is if mine went out privately to you. If I did that, it was my mistake and you did correctly by responding to the list.
I meant that maybe his provider wants him to use Unique Local Addresses. But it can be what you say.
The ISP would not expect a user to use NAT. NAT is a hack to get around the IPv4 address shortage. Unfortunately, it's become so common that many think it's the normal way of doing things. It's become a curse, as it breaks things.
Of course.
Would the inside prefix he is supposed to get be registered on the log, somehow?
Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file.
Then a script can be created to handle the situation, even if openSUSE doesn't. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.0 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On 2019-08-20 02:39 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
Would the inside prefix he is supposed to get be registered on the log, somehow? Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file. Then a script can be created to handle the situation, even if openSUSE doesn't.
I believe the DHCP client has to request it and one that doesn't support PD won't. The way around this is to use a DHCPv6-PD client. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-20 02:39 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
Would the inside prefix he is supposed to get be registered on the log, somehow? Possibly. It is stored in the DUID file. Then a script can be created to handle the situation, even if openSUSE doesn't.
I believe the DHCP client has to request it and one that doesn't support PD won't. The way around this is to use a DHCPv6-PD client.
Exactly. I wonder what pfsense uses. Maybe it's wide-dhcpv6. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.2°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - virtual servers, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2019-08-20 02:53 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Exactly. I wonder what pfsense uses. Maybe it's wide-dhcpv6.
I just did a search and found that FreeBSD, which pfSense runs on, uses wide-dhcpv6. At least that's what turned up. I can't say for certain. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-20 02:53 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Exactly. I wonder what pfsense uses. Maybe it's wide-dhcpv6.
I just did a search and found that FreeBSD, which pfSense runs on, uses wide-dhcpv6. At least that's what turned up. I can't say for certain.
Mark wrote "But wide-dhcpv6 is no longer available on openSUSE.". Judging by software.o.o, it doesn't look like anyone is building it either. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.2°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - virtual servers, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2019-08-20 03:03 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-20 02:53 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Exactly. I wonder what pfsense uses. Maybe it's wide-dhcpv6. I just did a search and found that FreeBSD, which pfSense runs on, uses wide-dhcpv6. At least that's what turned up. I can't say for certain. Mark wrote "But wide-dhcpv6 is no longer available on openSUSE.".
Judging by software.o.o, it doesn't look like anyone is building it either.
I asked in the pfSense forum and here's what they said: dhcpd --version isc-dhcpd-4.3.6-P1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2019-08-20 03:51 PM, James Knott wrote:
I asked in the pfSense forum and here's what they said: dhcpd --version isc-dhcpd-4.3.6-P1 Sorry, that should be dhcp6c, which is apparently part of wide.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Отправлено с iPhone
20 авг. 2019 г., в 22:51, James Knott <james.knott@jknott.net> написал(а):
On 2019-08-20 03:03 PM, Per Jessen wrote: James Knott wrote:
On 2019-08-20 02:53 PM, Per Jessen wrote: Exactly. I wonder what pfsense uses. Maybe it's wide-dhcpv6. I just did a search and found that FreeBSD, which pfSense runs on, uses wide-dhcpv6. At least that's what turned up. I can't say for certain. Mark wrote "But wide-dhcpv6 is no longer available on openSUSE.".
Judging by software.o.o, it doesn't look like anyone is building it either.
I asked in the pfSense forum and here's what they said: dhcpd --version isc-dhcpd-4.3.6-P1
NetworkManager supports prefix delegation. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2019-08-20 04:18 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
I asked in the pfSense forum and here's what they said: dhcpd --version isc-dhcpd-4.3.6-P1
NetworkManager supports prefix delegation.
So, someone should be able to build a router that uses DHCPv6-PD, if they use NetworkManager? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
20.08.2019 23:31, James Knott пишет:
On 2019-08-20 04:18 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
I asked in the pfSense forum and here's what they said: dhcpd --version isc-dhcpd-4.3.6-P1
NetworkManager supports prefix delegation.
So, someone should be able to build a router that uses DHCPv6-PD, if they use NetworkManager?
The target use case in NetworkManager is connection sharing. It supports autoconfiguring of multiple "downstream" interfaces using delegated prefixes obtained on "upstream" interface. "downstream" interfaces are designated by setting ipv6.method=shared (or selecting corresponding value in GUI). If this fits your definition of "router" then answer is "yes". As far as I can tell, prefix delegation works only with "dhclient" dhcp client. "internal" client (which is default in current upstream NM) does not support prefix delegation as of now. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
On 2019-08-20 03:03 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Mark wrote "But wide-dhcpv6 is no longer available on openSUSE.".
Judging by software.o.o, it doesn't look like anyone is building it either.
Here's the SourceForge page on it. Perhaps someone could build it for openSUSE. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
participants (9)
-
Andrei Borzenkov -
Antonio Ojea Garcia -
Bengt Gördén -
Carlos E. R. -
Carlos E.R. -
Dave Howorth -
James Knott -
Mark Petersen -
Per Jessen