Today was supposed to be the day for 10.2 beta 2 to be released. So far I have not been able to locate it. Does anyone have insight into when this will appear? Cheers, Bob
Robert Lewis wrote:
Today was supposed to be the day for 10.2 beta 2 to be released. So far I have not been able to locate it.
Does anyone have insight into when this will appear?
I woud also like to know. I've been checking every 1/2 hours or so since yesterday, 9 Nov, but nada. BTW, on whose calendar are we to accept "9 Nov" as the release date? I live in the future: my calendar is showing that today is 10 Nov but on the east and west coasts of America it is still 9 Nov. In Zurich it is, of course, 10 Nov. (And as an aside, this is part of the "9/11" and "11/9" argument: should not there be also a stipulation that all *dates* should be based on the same location as UTC/GMT to avoid this uncertainty?) Cheers. -- "If the Iranians were to have a nuclear weapon they could proliferate." George W. Bush 21 March 2006
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Basil Chupin wrote:
Robert Lewis wrote:
Today was supposed to be the day for 10.2 beta 2 to be released. So far I have not been able to locate it.
Does anyone have insight into when this will appear?
I woud also like to know. I've been checking every 1/2 hours or so since yesterday, 9 Nov, but nada.
It is going out to the mirrors. I expect an annoucement later. You can look at the factory list. I asked the question their. -- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047
Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Basil Chupin wrote:
Robert Lewis wrote:
Today was supposed to be the day for 10.2 beta 2 to be released. So far I have not been able to locate it.
Does anyone have insight into when this will appear? I woud also like to know. I've been checking every 1/2 hours or so since yesterday, 9 Nov, but nada.
It is going out to the mirrors. I expect an annoucement later. You can look at the factory list. I asked the question their.
-- Boyd Gerber <gerberb@zenez.com> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047
Many thanks for this. On the way, then? :-) Cheers. -- If apathy is increasing, where is it coming from?
It took us a bit longer due to some blocker fixes that made installation impossible. I'm always announcing on opensuse-announce, so subscribe there if you're interested. Once I start releasing I'll also update the "Most Annoying Bugs page (http://en.opensuse.org/Bugs:Most_Annoying_Bugs) with a planned release date. I collect there important bugs and note that we're in the release process. I had mentioned there yesterday that the release is planned to be 2006-10-11. Hope this helps for the future, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
On 2006/11/10 15:11 (GMT+0100) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
I had mentioned there yesterday that the release is planned to be 2006-10-11. Hope this helps for the future,
11 October 2006? -- "Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven." Matthew 5:12 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Felix Miata <mrmazda@ij.net> writes:
On 2006/11/10 15:11 (GMT+0100) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
I had mentioned there yesterday that the release is planned to be 2006-10-11. Hope this helps for the future,
11 October 2006?
;-) 2006-11-10 ;-) 10th of November, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/11/10 15:11 (GMT+0100) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
I had mentioned there yesterday that the release is planned to be 2006-10-11. Hope this helps for the future,
11 October 2006?
If people are going to use the ISO format, they should do it correctly. For example, today's date is 2006-11-11. Now isn't that clear? ;-) Actually, the ISO standard says the date & time should be listed in descending order. That is YYYY-MM-DD etc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
James Knott wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/11/10 15:11 (GMT+0100) Andreas Jaeger apparently typed:
I had mentioned there yesterday that the release is planned to be 2006-10-11. Hope this helps for the future,
11 October 2006?
If people are going to use the ISO format, they should do it correctly. For example, today's date is 2006-11-11. Now isn't that clear? ;-)
Actually, the ISO standard says the date & time should be listed in descending order. That is YYYY-MM-DD etc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Well, thank goodness we aren't starting this millenium off with a 2-digit year... ...or we'd all soon be visited by 07-07-07 (distant cousin to James Bond) LOL -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
participants (7)
-
Andreas Jaeger -
Basil Chupin -
Boyd Lynn Gerber -
Felix Miata -
James Knott -
penguin_powered -
Robert Lewis