SLES 9: Using RAID: Lilo/Grub Fails During Install
I am trying to install SLES 9 on a system with 2 36gb SCSI disks with a RAID 1 config. First I create 6 partitions as follows: On sda and sdb I create 3 partitions each as follows: Primary partition, Type 0X83, no mount point, size 100mb (for /boot) Primary partition, Type 0x83, no mount point, size 1024mb (for swap) Primary partition, Type 0x83, no mount point, size 33gb (for /) I then select Raid->create and create 3 RAID 1 devices: md0: /boot using sda1 and sdb1 (formated as ext3) md1: swap using sda2 and sdb2 (formatted as swap) md2: / using sda3 and sdb3 (formatted as ext3) Everything seems to go fine and I install the entire OS and get to the end of the install when it is performing the final configuration changes. It then fails saying unable to install LILO. I then retry and select grub (new configuration) and same thing. If I reboot the system I end up at a grub prompt. The same partitioning scheme worked on Fedora Core 2 which was what this install was replacing. Any ideas what my problem is? Thanks, CC ===== Chuck Carson - Sr. Systems Engineer Syrrx, Inc. - www.syrrx.com 10410 Science Center Drive San Diego, CA 92121 Work: 858.622.8528 Fax: 858.550.0526
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:47:56 -0800 (PST), Rhugga
I am trying to install SLES 9 on a system with 2 36gb SCSI disks with a RAID 1 config.
First I create 6 partitions as follows:
On sda and sdb I create 3 partitions each as follows: Primary partition, Type 0X83, no mount point, size 100mb (for /boot) Primary partition, Type 0x83, no mount point, size 1024mb (for swap) Primary partition, Type 0x83, no mount point, size 33gb (for /)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when doing software RAID don't you create the partitions as type Linux RAID, not as Linux? You've also created your swap partitions as type Linux instead of Linux Swap (type 82).
Some more info. When creating a raid device it tells you to create your partitions as either 0x83
or 0xFD (Linux Raid). I chose 0x83 and it did not work. (I am trying as we speak using 0XFD as the
type) However, I have w/o a doubt used this in the past, including the very system I am working on
now. (onboard LSI SCSI, 2x35 scsi-3 on same channel)
I just contacted a buddy of mine that does alot of nitty gritty Linux development as he says he
remembers something about a bug related to this. I think the SuSE installer should not say to
create as either 0x83 or 0xFD, instead it should say 0xFD only. The reason why it works on some
other distros is actually because of a bug, lol. (not sure on this, just hear-say from some linux
developers I know)
I'm not sure what the issue is, but I am reinstalling now trying the oxFD part type.
-cc
--- mmarseglia
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:47:56 -0800 (PST), Rhugga
wrote: I am trying to install SLES 9 on a system with 2 36gb SCSI disks with a RAID 1 config.
First I create 6 partitions as follows:
On sda and sdb I create 3 partitions each as follows: Primary partition, Type 0X83, no mount point, size 100mb (for /boot) Primary partition, Type 0x83, no mount point, size 1024mb (for swap) Primary partition, Type 0x83, no mount point, size 33gb (for /)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when doing software RAID don't you create the partitions as type Linux RAID, not as Linux?
You've also created your swap partitions as type Linux instead of Linux Swap (type 82).
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
IIRC, I have read before that the /boot partition is supposed to be ext2
only, not ext3.
- Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Rhugga [mailto:rhugga@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 1:28 PM
To: mmarseglia; suse-linux-e@suse.com
Subject: Re: [SLE] SLES 9: Using RAID: Lilo/Grub Fails During Install
Some more info. When creating a raid device it tells you to create your
partitions as either 0x83
or 0xFD (Linux Raid). I chose 0x83 and it did not work. (I am trying as
we speak using 0XFD as the
type) However, I have w/o a doubt used this in the past, including the
very system I am working on
now. (onboard LSI SCSI, 2x35 scsi-3 on same channel)
I just contacted a buddy of mine that does alot of nitty gritty Linux
development as he says he
remembers something about a bug related to this. I think the SuSE
installer should not say to
create as either 0x83 or 0xFD, instead it should say 0xFD only. The
reason why it works on some
other distros is actually because of a bug, lol. (not sure on this, just
hear-say from some linux
developers I know)
I'm not sure what the issue is, but I am reinstalling now trying the
oxFD part type.
-cc
--- mmarseglia
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:47:56 -0800 (PST), Rhugga
wrote: I am trying to install SLES 9 on a system with 2 36gb SCSI disks
with a RAID 1 config.
First I create 6 partitions as follows:
On sda and sdb I create 3 partitions each as follows: Primary partition, Type 0X83, no mount point, size 100mb (for
/boot)
Primary partition, Type 0x83, no mount point, size 1024mb (for swap) Primary partition, Type 0x83, no mount point, size 33gb (for /)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when doing software RAID don't you create the partitions as type Linux RAID, not as Linux?
You've also created your swap partitions as type Linux instead of Linux Swap (type 82).
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
I recently modified my syslog.conf file and then went to yast to disable/enable the syslogd service as as quick and dirty way to get syslog.conf reread. Big mistake. When you disable syslog in YAST a large number of other services are automatically disabled for you. That's not so bad, but when you reenable syslog those services are not turned back on. I have gone back and reenabled those services as best as I could but I would appreciate it if someone could point me to a list of services that are turned on in a default installation of Suse 9.2 to make sure that I'm not overlooking something. On a related matter, it __seems__ that disable/enable syslogd caused powersaved to be enabled. I'm only 10% confident of this (don't want to mess with syslogd to test this out) but powersaved was enabled after my first disable/enable sequence. Now it might have been enabled earlier but I don't know how. In fact it was the powersaved daemon that made me realize I had a problem because I saw that a stream of error messages were being syslogged by the system saying that it could not connect to the powersaved daemon which led me to fire up the runlevel editor in YAST and that's when I saw a lot of important services were turned off. Thanks, Patrick
On Friday 10 December 2004 9:24 am, Patrick John Hays wrote:
I recently modified my syslog.conf file and then went to yast to disable/enable the syslogd service as as quick and dirty way to get syslog.conf reread. Big mistake.
When you disable syslog in YAST a large number of other services are automatically disabled for you. That's not so bad, but when you reenable syslog those services are not turned back on.
Hi Patrick, This problem deserves a "Feedback". http://www.suse.de/feedback . PeterB
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 11:00, Peter B Van Campen wrote:
On Friday 10 December 2004 9:24 am, Patrick John Hays wrote:
I recently modified my syslog.conf file and then went to yast to disable/enable the syslogd service as as quick and dirty way to get syslog.conf reread. Big mistake.
When you disable syslog in YAST a large number of other services are automatically disabled for you. That's not so bad, but when you reenable syslog those services are not turned back on.
Hi Patrick,
This problem deserves a "Feedback". http://www.suse.de/feedback .
Not sure this would require a feedback as it is the correct way that it functions. A better way to get syslog to re-read it's config is rcsyslog reload Which causes syslog to re-read the conf file. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989 SuSE since 1998 * Only reply to the list please*
The Friday 2004-12-10 at 10:24 -0500, Patrick John Hays wrote:
I recently modified my syslog.conf file and then went to yast to disable/enable the syslogd service as as quick and dirty way to get syslog.conf reread. Big mistake.
Ah. Next time, use comand line: rcsyslog restart o perhaps "reload". On a root's console, just type "rc[tab][tab]" and you will get the list of all available "rc*" commands. It doesn't matter if those services are running or not, or dissabled or not. -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson
participants (7)
-
Carlos E. R.
-
Ken Schneider
-
mmarseglia
-
Patrick John Hays
-
Peter B Van Campen
-
Rhugga
-
Richard Mixon (qwest)