Good day, I know this may not be the place, but I have found Slashdot to be one of the worst places of information or news for anyone. Especially for Linux newbies... Unfortuantly I see a lot of mis-information or mis-understanding on there. My question is: What do people use for news concerning Tech news that is accurate? I know I use newsforge and linuxtoday, is there anymore? Matt
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Matthew Johnson wrote: [snip
My question is:
What do people use for news concerning Tech news that is accurate? I know I use newsforge and linuxtoday, is there anymore? [snip]
http://www.newshub.com/tech Gary Sublett
Thanks! On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Gary L Sublett wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Matthew Johnson wrote: [snip
My question is:
What do people use for news concerning Tech news that is accurate? I know I use newsforge and linuxtoday, is there anymore? [snip]
Gary Sublett
**strings of ones and zeros arranged themselves into a message from Matthew Johnson <matthew@psychohorse.com> on Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:37:56 -0800 (PST) which said... **> > What do people use for news concerning Tech news that is accurate? Not certain this is the sort of hting you were looking for, but it is a good place for *newbies* to get thier feet wet <g> www.pinehead.com seems to be at least semi acurate, which for any new site seems to be all one can ask. EVen "hard news" sites are hoaxed regualrly, or they just get it wrong. posibly because humans are involved in the editing . Blondely, j afterthought What makes Teflon stick to the pan?
I enjoy the register: http://www.theregister.co.uk/ Yo, Dannie jfweber@eternal.net wrote:
**strings of ones and zeros arranged themselves into a message from Matthew Johnson <matthew@psychohorse.com> on Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:37:56 -0800 (PST) which said...
**> > What do people use for news concerning Tech news that is accurate?
Not certain this is the sort of hting you were looking for, but it is a good place for *newbies* to get thier feet wet <g> www.pinehead.com
seems to be at least semi acurate, which for any new site seems to be all one can ask. EVen "hard news" sites are hoaxed regualrly, or they just get it wrong. posibly because humans are involved in the editing . Blondely,
j
afterthought What makes Teflon stick to the pan?
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
-- Dannie M Stanley SpinWeb Net Designs, Inc. http://www.spinweb.net
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Dannie M Stanley wrote: <*]Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:18:18 -0500 <*]From: Dannie M Stanley <dannie@spinweb.net> <*]To: suse-linux-e@suse.com <*]Subject: Re: [SLE] Opinions on Slashdot.... <*] <*]I enjoy the register: <*] <*] http://www.theregister.co.uk/ <*] For something a little more "scientific", you can browse through MIT's Techreview: http://www.techreview.com/ ciao ________________ Nicolas Beaulieu Teamwork is essential: it allows you to blame someone else. _________________
On Friday 26 January 2001 17:19, Matthew Johnson wrote:
Good day,
I know this may not be the place, but I have found Slashdot to be one of the worst places of information or news for anyone. Especially for Linux newbies...
Unfortuantly I see a lot of mis-information or mis-understanding on there.
My question is:
What do people use for news concerning Tech news that is accurate? I know I use newsforge and linuxtoday, is there anymore?
Matt
I think you've hit the top two. I browse SlashDot for the science stories. Reading the comments is an exercise is wadding through the sewers. The signal/noise ration is extremely low. SlashDot will have to begin moderating their site or risk losing their image. It's already tarnished. jlk -- Scientific theories, according to Sir Karl Popper, can be "falsified," or proven wrong, by experiment. Unscientific theories -Marxist dialectical history and Freudian psychology were Popper's favorites- are formed in such a way that they cannot be falsified by data.
It has long had moderation on Slashdot and it isn't that hard to filter out the crap. Try using your config settings. :) *^*^*^* Have the courage to take your own thoughts seriously, for they will shape you. -- Albert Einstein On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Jerry Kreps wrote:
On Friday 26 January 2001 17:19, Matthew Johnson wrote:
Good day,
I know this may not be the place, but I have found Slashdot to be one of the worst places of information or news for anyone. Especially for Linux newbies...
Unfortuantly I see a lot of mis-information or mis-understanding on there.
My question is:
What do people use for news concerning Tech news that is accurate? I know I use newsforge and linuxtoday, is there anymore?
Matt
I think you've hit the top two. I browse SlashDot for the science stories. Reading the comments is an exercise is wadding through the sewers. The signal/noise ration is extremely low. SlashDot will have to begin moderating their site or risk losing their image. It's already tarnished. jlk
-- Scientific theories, according to Sir Karl Popper, can be "falsified," or proven wrong, by experiment. Unscientific theories -Marxist dialectical history and Freudian psychology were Popper's favorites- are formed in such a way that they cannot be falsified by data.
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/support/faq
participants (7)
-
Dannie M Stanley
-
Gary L Sublett
-
Jerry Kreps
-
jfweber@eternal.net
-
Matthew Johnson
-
Michael
-
Nicolas Beaulieu