Re: Reply-To, hijacking threads, & TOFU & Bloody Hell top posting is so microsoftish AGAIN
Thought i would forward this as it came off list and is priceless! On Monday 23 December 2002 8:07 pm, rex wrote:
Vince Littler <suse@archipelago.u-net.com> [2002-12-23 11:54]:
On Monday 23 December 2002 4:49 pm, rex wrote:
[Text repeated at the bottom to [dis]please those who hate top posting]
Groan. If I can think of 1 ignorant thing I see on this list it is this old top posting is so microsoftish crap.
I didn't say anything about Microsoft.
only put 1 question to the list and been roundly ignored [months ago - I have lost interest in an answer],
[...]
What I find really galling is having self righteous zealot drivel on this top or bottom posting issue, together with smug urls on how to do it right filling my in box, as the price for no answer.
Perhaps the reason you were ignored is because you can't be bothered to read the URL (which I posted) on how to ask a question so it is likely to be answered.
It's all about fast, effective comunication with as little wasted time as possible. Following the long-establised standards facilitates these things.
-rex
For the record, rex is right. Of 'this old top posting is so microsoftish crap', rex never wrote 'microsoft'. rex, take that literally and congratulate yourself for winning that point. Also, a big Thankyou rex for posting your magic URL which will save us all from being ignored. Do you have any even more powerful URL's, in case the magic wears thin. If I were you I would start looking now! Good laugh eh? Vince Littler
participants (1)
-
Vince Littler