Re: [SLE] [CD-BURN] mkisofs
From: Oliver Ob <ob_ok@gmx.net> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
I'm not discounting the possibility that that is conforming to RFC-abnoxious, however it's very annoying as it doesn't show me to where I am getting mail, or why.
"TO: or CC:" field of messages to sort them into the proper folder. I'd filter
Do not filter on to: or cc: because it's not reliable. I believe a mailing list is supposed to set sender:, but hey, this works well: :0: * ^From suse-linux-e-return- * ^Delivered-to: .*suse-linux-e * ^X-Mailinglist: suse-linux-e$ $LISTS/SuSE/suse-linux-e-List Volker
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:35:09PM +1200 or thereabouts, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
From: Oliver Ob <ob_ok@gmx.net> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
I'm not discounting the possibility that that is conforming to RFC-abnoxious, however it's very annoying as it doesn't show me to where I am getting mail, or why.
I agree totally, and my procmail heretofore would not distribute this to my normal SuSE folder, so since he did not change it (the undisclosed recipients), he now goes into the bitbox.. /dev/null from my added procmail recipe. -- Best regards, Gary Today's thought: BREAKFAST.COM Halted - Cereal port not responding.
Volker Kuhlmann schrieb:
From: Oliver Ob <ob_ok@gmx.net> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
I'm not discounting the possibility that that is conforming to RFC-abnoxious, however it's very annoying as it doesn't show me to where I am getting mail, or why.
typic german. haha, no i only made this because ONE or TWO complained all the time that i was posting to a variety of addresses. so: no view no complaints... was better.
"TO: or CC:" field of messages to sort them into the proper folder. I'd filter
Do not filter on to: or cc: because it's not reliable.
I believe a mailing list is supposed to set sender:, but hey, this works well:
:0: * ^From suse-linux-e-return- * ^Delivered-to: .*suse-linux-e * ^X-Mailinglist: suse-linux-e$ $LISTS/SuSE/suse-linux-e-List
Volker yes. entirely. best solution - and no complaints........ -- *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ =Oliver@home= *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ I http://www.bmw-roadster.de/Friends/Olli/olli.html I I http://www.bmw-roadster.de/Friends/friends.html I I http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VGAP-93 I I http://home.t-online.de/home/spacecraft.portal I
Telek0ma iBBMS - soon back online +49.4503.TRSi1/TRSi2 <<<
Volker Kuhlmann schrieb:
From: Oliver Ob <ob_ok@gmx.net> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
I'm not discounting the possibility that that is conforming to RFC-abnoxious, however it's very annoying as it doesn't show me to where I am getting mail, or why.
typic german. haha, no i only made this because ONE or TWO complained all the time that i was posting to a variety of addresses. so: no view no complaints... was better.
"TO: or CC:" field of messages to sort them into the proper folder. I'd filter
Do not filter on to: or cc: because it's not reliable.
I believe a mailing list is supposed to set sender:, but hey, this works well:
:0: * ^From suse-linux-e-return- * ^Delivered-to: .*suse-linux-e * ^X-Mailinglist: suse-linuX-Mozilla-Status: 0009se-linux-e-List
Volker yes. entirely. best solution - and no complaints........ -- *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ =Oliver@home= *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ I http://www.bmw-roadster.de/Friends/Olli/olli.html I I http://www.bmw-roadster.de/Friends/friends.html I I http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VGAP-93 I I http://home.t-online.de/home/spacecraft.portal I
Telek0ma iBBMS - soon back online +49.4503.TRSi1/TRSi2 <<<
participants (3)
-
Gary -
Oliver Ob -
Volker Kuhlmann