[opensuse] 32-bit vs 64-bit
I've been reading with interest the recent threads about 64-bit installations. I'm in the process of building a new computer, strictly to play with Linux on something other than a clapped-out old beater. (All the parts will arrive tomorrow from NewEgg.com, so today seems a little like Christmas eve to me.) It's not needed for work, or any other purpose other than having fun and learning more about Linux. (I work all day writing commercial Windows business software.) I'll be using an Athlon dual-core 64-bit chip, 2 GB of dual-channel RAM, and at least until the recent conversations, I had been planning on installing the current "stable" 64-bit OpenSuSE distro. Given the circumstances I've described, would that (a) be a worthwhile learning experience, (b) appear no different than a 32-bit installation, (c) be nothing but trouble, or (d) something else? If (a), I'm looking forward to using my first ever 64-bit computer. Otherwise, I'll just install the 32-bit distro, and continue my Linux education on that. Thanks in advance for your comments. Jerry in Bothell, WA -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Jerry, On Tuesday 15 May 2007 10:50, Jerry Houston wrote:
...
I'll be using an Athlon dual-core 64-bit chip, 2 GB of dual-channel RAM, and at least until the recent conversations, I had been planning on installing the current "stable" 64-bit OpenSuSE distro.
Given the circumstances I've described, would that (a) be a worthwhile learning experience, (b) appear no different than a 32-bit installation, (c) be nothing but trouble, or (d) something else?
(a) At least a little, except that... (b) Is the goal, I believe. The point is have identical capabilities and features with the addition of more spacious virtual address capacity limits. But that will be of little consequence with only 2GB of RAM installed. (c) I doubt it, but there seem to be a lingering trickle of people with issues surrounding browser plug-ins. (d) As always, YMMV... Since you're explicitly embarking on this as a learning experience, you could always set up a dual-boot configuration for "compare and contrast" purposes. I'm really not up on it, but perhaps you could use Xen or one of the other virtualization systems to have both at once. Since you've got a dual-core processor, it should perform pretty well, though 2GB is even more restrictive in a concurrent dual-OS situation.
...
Jerry in Bothell, WA
Randall Schulz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Randall R Schulz wrote:
Since you're explicitly embarking on this as a learning experience, you could always set up a dual-boot configuration for "compare and contrast" purposes. I'm really not up on it, but perhaps you could use Xen or one of the other virtualization systems to have both at once. Since you've got a dual-core processor, it should perform pretty well, though 2GB is even more restrictive in a concurrent dual-OS situation.
Thanks for your comments, Randall. The motherboard I'll be using has room for two RAM modules, and although it supports up to 8 GB in each (16 GB total), it's not easy to find modules that big. And even 2 GB modules are pretty expensive for a toy. The dual-boot idea is a good one, and one I hadn't thought about. I dual-boot Windows XP and Linux on one of my laptops, but it didn't occur to me to do it with two versions of Linux. Thanks! You've gotten me curious about virtualization as well. I use VirtualPC, VirtualServer, and various VMware products on XP-Pro and Server 2003, but never experimented with VM's on Linux. (I've never had Linux running on a machine with that much horsepower.) That sounds like an adventure, too. Thanks again for the help, Jerry in Bothell, WA -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 5/15/07, Jerry Houston
Randall R Schulz wrote:
Since you're explicitly embarking on this as a learning experience, you could always set up a dual-boot configuration for "compare and contrast" purposes. I'm really not up on it, but perhaps you could use Xen or one of the other virtualization systems to have both at once. Since you've got a dual-core processor, it should perform pretty well, though 2GB is even more restrictive in a concurrent dual-OS situation.
Thanks for your comments, Randall. The motherboard I'll be using has room for two RAM modules, and although it supports up to 8 GB in each (16 GB total), it's not easy to find modules that big. And even 2 GB modules are pretty expensive for a toy.
I just read an article that RAM prices are starting to drop rapidly, so con't buy more too quick. Apparently the big boys (Dell/HP) have been getting ram for $40/GB for several months but have kept the selling price up in the $100/$120 GB range. Possibly because they had a bunch of old inventory they bought for higher prices. Regardless retail price is supposedly starting to reflect the cheaper volume pricing. Hopefully we will all be able to get cheaper RAM soon. If retail drops to $50/GB or something that would be fantastic. Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 13:19, Jerry Houston wrote:
but it didn't occur to me to do it with two versions of Linux. Two or more... on a machine that size you also might want in install the latest Ubuntu 7.04 too. -- Kind regards,
M Harris <>< -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 19:50, Jerry Houston wrote: Hi Jerry,
Given the circumstances I've described, would that (a) be a worthwhile learning experience, (b) appear no different than a 32-bit installation, (c) be nothing but trouble, or (d) something else?
If (a), I'm looking forward to using my first ever 64-bit computer. Otherwise, I'll just install the 32-bit distro, and continue my Linux education on that. Thanks in advance for your comments.
Sounds like quite an adventure. As Randall said, you might want to partition the drive and install both 32 and 64 bit versions to experiment. On this machine, I originally has SUSE 10 and WinXP. However after upgrading to the dual opteron machine, XP wouldn't boot. It would hang and never did boot. So I decided to install 64bit SUSE. Am I pleased. There were a few niggles like some of the browser extensions, but for the most part it ran and still runs like a champ. Eventually I got rid of the 32bit version and now run the 64 bit exclusively. A few tweaks, and all is well. Programs seem to load in a flash, and unless there is a power outage it runs and runs. I actually don't know if I need the 64bit version, but it's been quite stable so I let it go. Mike -- Powered by SuSE 10.0 Kernel 2.6.13 X86_64 KDE 3.4 Kmail 1.8 8:31pm up 1 day 3:51, 4 users, load average: 2.29, 2.41, 2.32 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Jerry Houston wrote:
I've been reading with interest the recent threads about 64-bit installations. I'm in the process of building a new computer, strictly to play with Linux on something other than a clapped-out old beater. (All the parts will arrive tomorrow from NewEgg.com, so today seems a little like Christmas eve to me.) It's not needed for work, or any other purpose other than having fun and learning more about Linux. (I work all day writing commercial Windows business software.)
I'll be using an Athlon dual-core 64-bit chip, 2 GB of dual-channel RAM, and at least until the recent conversations, I had been planning on installing the current "stable" 64-bit OpenSuSE distro.
Given the circumstances I've described, would that (a) be a worthwhile learning experience, (b) appear no different than a 32-bit installation, (c) be nothing but trouble, or (d) something else?
If (a), I'm looking forward to using my first ever 64-bit computer. Otherwise, I'll just install the 32-bit distro, and continue my Linux education on that. Thanks in advance for your comments.
Jerry in Bothell, WA
I run 64 bit SUSE on my system and so far the only issue is with browsers, in that 64 bit pluggins are not common. That said however, you can install both 64 and 32 bit apps on the same system and you'd have a tough time telling which is which. So, go for the 64 bit OS and install 32 bit Firefox etc. Besides, with 64 bits, you can use bigger words in text documents. ;-) -- Use OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 2:52 pm, James Knott wrote:
I run 64 bit SUSE on my system and so far the only issue is with browsers, in that 64 bit pluggins are not common.
Also, the win32 codecs for mplayer won't work. For these 2 reasons I went back and did the 32-bit install. Jorge -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
* Jorge Fábregas
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 2:52 pm, James Knott wrote:
I run 64 bit SUSE on my system and so far the only issue is with browsers, in that 64 bit pluggins are not common.
Also, the win32 codecs for mplayer won't work. For these 2 reasons I went back and did the 32-bit install.
I am also running x86_64, with: 2.6.18.8-396-default #1 SMP MPlayer-w32codecs-1.0rc1-0@i586 RealPlayer-10.0.8-0.2@i586 flash-player-9.0.31.0-2.1@i586 mplayerplug-in-3.40-0.pm.1@i586 MPlayer-k8-1.0rc1-jen2@x86_64 MPlayer-k8_sse3-1.0rc1-jen2@x86_64 alsaplayer-0.99.76-73@x86_64 kmplayer-0.9.4a-1.guru.suse101@x86_64 MozillaFirefox-2.0.0.3-11.2@i586 I have no problem that I am aware of :^) -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Jorge Fábregas
[05-15-07 15:17]: On Tuesday 15 May 2007 2:52 pm, James Knott wrote:
I run 64 bit SUSE on my system and so far the only issue is with browsers, in that 64 bit pluggins are not common.
Also, the win32 codecs for mplayer won't work. For these 2 reasons I went back and did the 32-bit install.
I am also running x86_64, with:
2.6.18.8-396-default #1 SMP
MPlayer-w32codecs-1.0rc1-0@i586 RealPlayer-10.0.8-0.2@i586 flash-player-9.0.31.0-2.1@i586 mplayerplug-in-3.40-0.pm.1@i586 MPlayer-k8-1.0rc1-jen2@x86_64 MPlayer-k8_sse3-1.0rc1-jen2@x86_64 alsaplayer-0.99.76-73@x86_64 kmplayer-0.9.4a-1.guru.suse101@x86_64 MozillaFirefox-2.0.0.3-11.2@i586
I have no problem that I am aware of :^)
Well, that's fine, but we need a list of problems that you're not aware of. ;-) -- Use OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
* James Knott
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I have no problem that I am aware of :^)
Well, that's fine, but we need a list of problems that you're not aware of. ;-)
I'm on it, brb :^) Please remain on the edge of your seat. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 3:59 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I have no problem that I am aware of :^)
You may have installed the w22codecs rpm but you won't play any WMV file :) Try these and you'll see: http://tinyurl.com/oxf5o HTH, Jorge -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
* Jorge Fábregas
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 3:59 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
I have no problem that I am aware of :^)
You may have installed the w22codecs rpm but you won't play any WMV file :)
Try these and you'll see:
guess you need to look at: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/JLeno.on.MPlayer.jpg the wmv is at: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/JLeno.wmv sorry... -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 5:05 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
guess you need to look at: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/JLeno.on.MPlayer.jpg
I just searched on the mplayer list and apparently ffmpeg and faad do the windows codecs fine in mplayer-64bit but I don't think they do the new versions. Patrick can you confirm the HD ones (WMV 9) on the link on my previous post? Cheers! Jorge -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
* Jorge Fábregas
I just searched on the mplayer list and apparently ffmpeg and faad do the windows codecs fine in mplayer-64bit but I don't think they do the new versions.
Patrick can you confirm the HD ones (WMV 9) on the link on my previous post?
No, there are only exe and aspx files. Give me a url to a proper wmv file and I will try it. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 5:53 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
No, there are only exe and aspx files.
Nope, those are not real executables. Those are compressed files. You can open them with unzip. Try it. Believe me :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
* Jorge Fábregas
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 5:53 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
No, there are only exe and aspx files.
Nope, those are not real executables. Those are compressed files. You can open them with unzip. Try it. Believe me :)
OK, lookey here: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenlineRush.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenlineRush1.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenlineRush2.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenlineRush.wmv The proof is in the pudding. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
* Patrick Shanahan
* Jorge Fábregas
[05-15-07 20:21]: On Tuesday 15 May 2007 5:53 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
No, there are only exe and aspx files.
Nope, those are not real executables. Those are compressed files. You can open them with unzip. Try it. Believe me :)
OK, lookey here: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenlineRush.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenlineRush1.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenlineRush2.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenlineRush.wmv
The proof is in the pudding.
My apologies, I must learn to spell :^( http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenalineRush.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenalineRush1.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenalineRush2.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenalineRush.wmv These links work, I tested them :^) -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 9:00 pm, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
My apologies, I must learn to spell :^(
http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenalineRush.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenalineRush1.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenalineRush2.jpg http://wahoo.no-ip.org/~pat/AdrenalineRush.wmv
Damn. Great then! I didn't know they´re working now. I assure you last year there was problem with it (win32 codecs on mplayer 64-bit). In this case apparently there's native support now (mplayer native or thru ffmpeg). Two questions: 1) Why do you view your videos in the browser (mplayer_plug-in)? I mean, for sites that have emdedded videos fine...but with something you download why? (and not mplayer or its GUI gmplayer)? 2) Could you please send me (off-list) the console output when you run: mplayer AdrenalineRush.wmv to figure out the codecs that are being used. Thanks Patrick! Jorge -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 2:52 pm, James Knott wrote:
I run 64 bit SUSE on my system and so far the only issue is with browsers, in that 64 bit pluggins are not common.
Also, the win32 codecs for mplayer won't work. For these 2 reasons I went back and did the 32-bit install.
Jorge
Are you certain of that? I'm not at home at the moment, so I can't verify, but I'm certain 64 bit Mplayer works for me. -- Use OpenOffice.org http://www.openoffice.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 4:06 pm, James Knott wrote:
Are you certain of that? I'm not at home at the moment, so I can't verify, but I'm certain 64 bit Mplayer works for me.
Yes, I'm pretty sure abou tit. I have everything installed, configured (spent about 2 days setting up everything) and then I couldn't play any windows-media-video anywhere...I did my Google search and it turns out Mplayer(64-bit) won't load 32-bit win codecs... For the rest of the codecs you may have no problem with mplayer...It's just those win32 codecs the problem... Check these: http://tinyurl.com/oxf5o -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
On 5/15/07, Jorge Fábregas
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 4:06 pm, James Knott wrote:
Are you certain of that? I'm not at home at the moment, so I can't verify, but I'm certain 64 bit Mplayer works for me.
Yes, I'm pretty sure abou tit. I have everything installed, configured (spent about 2 days setting up everything) and then I couldn't play any windows-media-video anywhere...I did my Google search and it turns out Mplayer(64-bit) won't load 32-bit win codecs... For the rest of the codecs you may have no problem with mplayer...It's just those win32 codecs the problem... Check these:
You need to install 32bit mplayer, and if you are using 64bit firefox, you need the 32bit mplayer plugin (not the 64 bit one) and use nspluginwrapper (http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/nspluginwrapper/) so FF uses the 32bit mplayer. Same for flash (only 32bit available). I do not have 64 bit 10.2, only 10.0, so I use the 64 bit browser. I think I read that in 10.2 by default you get the 32 bit browser, so you will not need to use the wrapper anyway. But for sure the mplayer need to be the 32 bit one in order to play wmv files. Even then the results will vary, the codecs have not been changed for a long time, newer versions of wmv exists, I have problems playing some of these videos even on 32 bit machine. So, I just stopped to watch content in wmv, as I do not want to tolerate content providers who do the "wrong" stuff :) -- Svetoslav Milenov (Sunny) Even the most advanced equipment in the hands of the ignorant is just a pile of scrap.
* Sunny
I have problems playing some of these videos even on 32 bit machine. So, I just stopped to watch content in wmv, as I do not want to tolerate content providers who do the "wrong" stuff :)
Even windoz uzers have probs with some wmvs amoung a hord of other probs :^). -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/ Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 2:52 pm, James Knott wrote:
I run 64 bit SUSE on my system and so far the only issue is with browsers, in that 64 bit pluggins are not common.
Also, the win32 codecs for mplayer won't work. For these 2 reasons I went back and did the 32-bit install.
Then just install 32-bit mplayer. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
I'll be using an Athlon dual-core 64-bit chip, 2 GB of dual-channel RAM, and at least until the recent conversations, I had been planning on installing the current "stable" 64-bit OpenSuSE distro. Sounds like a good and reasonable plan. I have been running x86_64 since 9.1 (presently 10.2). I find the learning experience to be even better.
Given the circumstances I've described, would that (a) be a worthwhile learning experience, Yes, and I say that from experience. (b) appear no different than a 32-bit installation, There certainly are some differences and challenges, but those enhance
(c) be nothing but trouble, or Definitely not. (d) something else? If this is mainly for the learning, with your hardware, I would heartily recommend installing openSUSE 10.2 x86_64. Not only is it a reliable system, it gives you potential to learn and grow in many areas.
If (a), I'm looking forward to using my first ever 64-bit computer. Otherwise, I'll just install the 32-bit distro, and continue my Linux education on that. Thanks in advance for your comments. I would definitely go with a (and did back in 2004) and grow on from
Jerry Houston wrote: the learning. I believe SUSE is on the cutting edge for x86_64, and to be the best and most organized distro for x86_64. there. There are many folks here that can help in the process. -- Joe Morris Registered Linux user 231871 running openSUSE 10.2 x86_64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
Joe Morris (NTM) wrote:
Jerry Houston wrote:
I'll be using an Athlon dual-core 64-bit chip, 2 GB of dual-channel RAM, and at least until the recent conversations, I had been planning on installing the current "stable" 64-bit OpenSuSE distro.
Sounds like a good and reasonable plan. I have been running x86_64 since 9.1 (presently 10.2). I find the learning experience to be even better.
Thanks for everyone's comments. The case, CPU, memory, drives and all arrive tomorrow, and tonight I'm like a kid on Christmas eve. I'm gonna go to bed early, then get up and go to work early, so I can come home shortly after noon. I hope I can get some sleep. <g> I'm definitely going with the 64-bit system, at least to start with, if no more than to say that I've done it. The last computer I built on the same GeForce 6100 motherboard has XP-Pro installed, and since the MB came with a CD full of Windows drivers and utilities, it was pretty easy to get all the devices in a row. I hope that SuSE 64 will find all those onboard components to its liking. If so, then I think this is gonna be fun. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org
participants (11)
-
Aaron Kulkis
-
Greg Freemyer
-
James Knott
-
Jerry Houston
-
Joe Morris (NTM)
-
Jorge Fábregas
-
M Harris
-
Mike
-
Patrick Shanahan
-
Randall R Schulz
-
Sunny