Once 10.1 final is released, are all the installation sources, as well as the ISOs going to be available on the regular SUSE mirrors, like they were with 9.3? God knows they should be. Having two sets of mirrors to install different parts of a basic SUSE Linux installation is just plain silly. It's bad enough we have to have things like packman and guru, to get around stupid US laws, we don't need this current silliness to continue, after going back to a single OS name. -- imotgm __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 10:59, frank nelson wrote:
Once 10.1 final is released, are all the installation sources, as well as the ISOs going to be available on the regular SUSE mirrors, like they were with 9.3? God knows they should be. Having two sets of mirrors to install different parts of a basic SUSE Linux installation is just plain silly. It's bad enough we have to have things like packman and guru, to get around stupid US laws, we don't need this current silliness to continue, after going back to a single OS name.
I believe the standard oss installation source (freeze of factory) will be on openSUSE mirrors. And Extra, KDE-update, Misc, etc. will be on ftp.suse.com-mirrors. I agree that it would be nice to have inst-source on ftp.suse.com-mirrors too. Guess it's a matter of how much the mirror-people will put up with. But Debian doesn't seem to have problems with mirrors - and with their 14 cds and god knows how many architectures and many netinstalls they must wreck havoc on mirrors. And by the way - Guru and Packman are working on a merger. That'll make things a little bit simpler. cb400f
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:27:06AM +0200, Martin Schlander wrote:
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 10:59, frank nelson wrote:
Once 10.1 final is released, are all the installation sources, as well as the ISOs going to be available on the regular SUSE mirrors, like they were with 9.3? God knows they should be. Having two sets of mirrors to install different parts of a basic SUSE Linux installation is just plain silly. It's bad enough we have to have things like packman and guru, to get around stupid US laws, we don't need this current silliness to continue, after going back to a single OS name.
I believe the standard oss installation source (freeze of factory) will be on openSUSE mirrors. And Extra, KDE-update, Misc, etc. will be on ftp.suse.com-mirrors. I agree that it would be nice to have inst-source on ftp.suse.com-mirrors too.
It would be nice to have everything directly suported (so not KDE-Update) in one single large directory. on ftp.suse.com mirrors. That way you can just add one SUSE url and be done with. For 10.0 you need 3 URL's on 2 different directory structures: [mirror]/pub/ftp.opensuse.org/opensuse/distribution/SL-10.0-OSS/inst-source/ One for inst-sorce-java and one for [mirror]/pub/ftp.suse.com/suse/i386/10.0/SUSE-Linux10.0-GM-Extra I understand that you might want to have the OSS and non-OSS appart. So use OSS on openSUSE mirrors and non-OSS *plus* OSS on suse.com I even doubt that the openSUSE mirror is needed, as people can decide wether or not to install software. houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
--- Martin Schlander
I believe the standard oss installation source (freeze of factory) will be on openSUSE mirrors. And Extra, KDE-update, Misc, etc. will be on ftp.suse.com-mirrors. I agree that it would be nice to have inst-source on ftp.suse.com-mirrors too.
Guess it's a matter of how much the mirror-people will put up with.
I highly doubt that, as I've been using SUSE since 6.x days, and everything has always been in one place, as it should be, until 10.0. SUSE OSS could have been nothing more than links to the appropriate parts of the suse directory tree. Looking at ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/suse/i386 one can see that directories exist for 9.0, and 9.1. 9.0 should be past security support by now, and 9.1 soon to follow. If 9.0 were removed from the mirrors, there would be more than enough room for the inst-source tree for 10.1. ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/ has both the suse tree, and opensuse tree. They certainly couldn't object to having the inst-source tree moved to the suse tree once it's finalized. OpenSUSE should be reserved for working on the next SUSE release, and the finished/finalized product should be moved to the suse.com mirrors, to avoid any confusion.
But Debian doesn't seem to have problems with mirrors > and with their 14 cds and god knows how many
architectures and many netinstalls they must wreck havoc on mirrors.
And by the way - Guru and Packman are working on a merger. That'll make things a little bit simpler.
At least that makes sense. -- imotgm __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
frank nelson wrote:
--- Martin Schlander
wrote: ... And by the way - Guru and Packman are working on a merger. That'll make things a little bit simpler.
At least that makes sense.
Hey, don't hold your breath, I'm "working" on migrating my RPMs over
to Packman since almost a year ;)
Not trivial to move 6 GB of packages.
Packman already has a quite good mirror infrastructure though, given
it's a community project and not a distribution on its own:
ftp://packman.links2linux.org/pub/packman/MIRRORS
Of course, if anyone has good contacts to some mirrors in the US... we
could use some more over there.
(or Belnet, or Heanet, ... ;))
cheers
--
-o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
/\\
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 15:01 +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
frank nelson wrote:
--- Martin Schlander
wrote: ... And by the way - Guru and Packman are working on a merger. That'll make things a little bit simpler.
At least that makes sense.
Hey, don't hold your breath, I'm "working" on migrating my RPMs over to Packman since almost a year ;) Not trivial to move 6 GB of packages.
Packman already has a quite good mirror infrastructure though, given it's a community project and not a distribution on its own: ftp://packman.links2linux.org/pub/packman/MIRRORS
Of course, if anyone has good contacts to some mirrors in the US... we could use some more over there. (or Belnet, or Heanet, ... ;))
cheers
You could try and contact ale.org (Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts). Maybe they could host a mirror site. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:01:11PM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Hey, don't hold your breath, I'm "working" on migrating my RPMs over to Packman since almost a year ;) Not trivial to move 6 GB of packages.
Burn them on 2 DVD's and mail them if transfering 6GB of data is too much. ;-D houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 14:44, frank nelson wrote:
Guess it's a matter of how much the mirror-people will put up with.
I highly doubt that, as I've been using SUSE since 6.x days, and everything has always been in one place, as it should be
Well, a combination of wanting to show off our openess - and the mirrormaintainers not wanting to mirror the same quite large repo twice (i.e. having inst-source on both ftp.suse.com and opensuse. Maybe another idea could be to have some kind of link from the ftp.suse.com mirrors to the inst-sources on opensuse-mirrors. Not sure if it's technically possible.
OpenSUSE should be reserved for working on the next SUSE release, and the finished/finalized product should be moved to the suse.com mirrors, to avoid any confusion.
This is a good idea actually. This would solve the problem with needing two different mirrors. Guess it would also be easier for mirror-maintainers to comprehend. And at the same time perhaps it would reduce the number of people who believe they're using some Linux distro called OpenSUSE (I've never heard seen it personally, but a lot of people talk about it ;) ). cb400f
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:06:27PM +0200, Martin Schlander wrote:
Well, a combination of wanting to show off our openess - and the mirrormaintainers not wanting to mirror the same quite large repo twice (i.e. having inst-source on both ftp.suse.com and opensuse.
ftp.suse.com should have everything. opensuse should have just the oss stuff, if at all. I tend to feel that as openSUSE is not a distribution, but a community, it should either only have the development part, or nothing at all.
Maybe another idea could be to have some kind of link from the ftp.suse.com mirrors to the inst-sources on opensuse-mirrors. Not sure if it's technically possible.
I doubt it. There are places that mirror with different subdirectory structures.
OpenSUSE should be reserved for working on the next SUSE release, and the finished/finalized product should be moved to the suse.com mirrors, to avoid any confusion.
This is a good idea actually. This would solve the problem with needing two different mirrors. Guess it would also be easier for mirror-maintainers to comprehend. And at the same time perhaps it would reduce the number of people who believe they're using some Linux distro called OpenSUSE (I've never heard seen it personally, but a lot of people talk about it ;) ).
I even have heard/seen SUSE people use it that way. houghi -- Nutze die Zeit. Sie ist das Kostbarste, was wir haben, denn es ist unwiederbringliche Lebenszeit. Leben ist aber mehr als Werk und Arbeit, und das Sein wichtiger als das Tun - Johannes Müller-Elmau
--- Martin Schlander
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 14:44, frank nelson wrote:
and everything has always been in one place, as it should be.
Well, a combination of wanting to show off our openess
Sounds more like the truth, about a misguided ego-trip, and more believable than blaming the mirror maintainers.
and the mirrormaintainers not wanting to mirror the same quite large repo twice (i.e. having inst- source on both ftp.suse.com and opensuse.
Not needed if handled properly. On the openSUSE mirrors there is a directory called factory, and it's called that for a reason. That is the very essence of what openSUSE is. It is the community part of the factory that produces SUSE Linux, and as such, like all factories, when the product is finished, it should be moved to the showroom, both to make room for building the next product in the factory, and to show-off the shiny new product in the showroom. It announces, and confirms that it is in fact finished, and ready for use. The showroom, should be, and always, prior to 10.0, was www.suse.com, and it's mirrors. The openSUSE mirrors should reflect the fact that they are the factory, and contain only works in progress. On Usenet we keep getting questions from people who went searching for SUSE 10.0, saw 10.1 and jumped right into the latest and greatest, not understanding the concept of beta software, and later, complaining when it doesn't work as expected. The finished and unfinished state of the product, SUSE Linux, needs to be the deciding factor as to where it resides, not the openness. By it's very nature all of SUSE Linux is OSS, except for the few things in the *extra directory, or at least that should be the dividing line. Anyone wanting pure OSS should be able to install all of SUSE, except the contents of the *extra directory, and know they have only OSS. All proprietary non-OSS things offered by SUSE Linux should properly be found in *extra only. This is a far more logical separation scheme than has existed with SUSE 10.0, and much easier for a SUSE newbie to grasp. -- imotgm __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
participants (5)
-
frank nelson
-
houghi
-
Kenneth Schneider
-
Martin Schlander
-
Pascal Bleser