beta4: gcc4-libvorbis problem?
Hello, can this be a gcc4 problem? On betta4 with the beta4_libvorbis: oggen -q4 ***.wav -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 5940599 2005-09-02 19:59 ***.ogg The sound quality is NOT ok.(it is really terrible) On betta4 with the suse9.3_libvorbis: (rpm -Uvh --force libvorbis... ) oggen -q4 ....wav -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 4182508 2005-09-02 20:10 ***.ogg The sound quality is ok! On betta4 with the suse9.3_libvorbis (rebuild whit gcc 4) oggen -q4 ....wav -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 5986931 2005-09-02 20:25 ***.ogg The sound quality ist NOT ok The same libvorbis version (suse9.3_libvorbis) makes different files ?! mfg
Michael Lange <opensuse@linux-settings.de> writes:
Hello, can this be a gcc4 problem?
On betta4 with the beta4_libvorbis: oggen -q4 ***.wav -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 5940599 2005-09-02 19:59 ***.ogg The sound quality is NOT ok.(it is really terrible)
On betta4 with the suse9.3_libvorbis: (rpm -Uvh --force libvorbis... ) oggen -q4 ....wav -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 4182508 2005-09-02 20:10 ***.ogg The sound quality is ok!
On betta4 with the suse9.3_libvorbis (rebuild whit gcc 4) oggen -q4 ....wav -rw-r--r-- 1 michael users 5986931 2005-09-02 20:25 ***.ogg The sound quality ist NOT ok
The same libvorbis version (suse9.3_libvorbis) makes different files ?!
Good be a problem of interaction with GCC 4, either a compiler bug or undefined behaviour. Could you file a bugreport - and copy me on it, for this, please? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
On Saturday 03 September 2005 14:03, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Good be a problem of interaction with GCC 4, either a compiler bug or undefined behaviour. Could you file a bugreport - and copy me on it, for this, please?
It looks like Ubuntu Linux has problems with a gcc4 compiled oggenc too. As a work-around they compile their package with gcc-3.4. Here is their bug report: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12722 Cheers, Andreas
Andreas Simon <andreas.w.simon@gmail.com> writes:
On Saturday 03 September 2005 14:03, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Good be a problem of interaction with GCC 4, either a compiler bug or undefined behaviour. Could you file a bugreport - and copy me on it, for this, please?
It looks like Ubuntu Linux has problems with a gcc4 compiled oggenc too. As a work-around they compile their package with gcc-3.4.
Here is their bug report: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12722
Thanks. I've opened a bugreport myself: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115135 and put new libogg libraries compiled with -fno-strict-aliasing at: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/libogg/ Could somebody test these packages and tell me whether they fix the problem? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
Andreas Simon <andreas.w.simon@gmail.com> writes:
On Saturday 03 September 2005 14:03, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Good be a problem of interaction with GCC 4, either a compiler bug or undefined behaviour. Could you file a bugreport - and copy me on it, for this, please?
It looks like Ubuntu Linux has problems with a gcc4 compiled oggenc too. As a work-around they compile their package with gcc-3.4.
Here is their bug report: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12722
Thanks.
I've opened a bugreport myself: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
and put new libogg libraries compiled with -fno-strict-aliasing at:
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/libogg/
and now libvorbis libraries under: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/aj/libvorbis Could somebody test these packages and tell me whether they fix the problem? Cheers Andreas P.S. Don't know why I grabbed libogg instead of libvorbis :-( -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Hi Andreas Should have tested before installing to see if I had a problem ;) ... but with the new packages it certainly all sounds very good. Andreas
On Sunday 04 September 2005 07:04, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes: Could somebody test these packages and tell me whether they fix the problem?
Yes, they seem to fix the issue. I made a comment to the bug report. Cheers, Andreas
participants (4)
-
Andreas Girardet -
Andreas Jaeger -
Andreas Simon -
Michael Lange