On 24/01/06, Damon Register wrote:

Kevanf1 wrote:

...

On 24/01/06, Damon Register wrote:

...

and I never throw anything away so I have my own archive. I suspect there are others too.

Forgive me if I am wrong but I was under the assumption that there is indeed a list archive. Or is this merely the archive as held by now I am confused. I posted to the OT list and the discussion was about the OT archive (or lack of one). Why post this here? Insufficient coffee? :-)

Damon Register

Quite possibly Damon :-) I've only had tea this morning but I had a very bad night. Ok, so is there not an archive for the OT list? It would seem strange if this is so. -- ============================================== I am only human, please forgive me if I make a mistake it is not deliberate. ============================================== Xmas may be over but, PLEASE DON'T drink and drive you'll make it to the next one that way. Kevan Farmer Linux user #373362 Cheslyn Hay Staffordshire WS6 7HR

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2006-01-24 at 07:19 -0500, Damon Register wrote:

Kevanf1 wrote:

...

On 24/01/06, Damon Register <> wrote:

...

and I never throw anything away so I have my own archive. I suspect there are others too.

Forgive me if I am wrong but I was under the assumption that there is indeed a list archive. Or is this merely the archive as held by now I am confused. I posted to the OT list and the discussion was about the OT archive (or lack of one). Why post this here? Insufficient coffee? :-)

A weird type on thread hijack. The email contents belong to the OT list, but the headers trace it fully to the SLE list, in this particular thread. It could be a gmail bug worth investigating, if Kevanf1 remembers how he did it. On your question, the OT list is not archived by SuSE, it is an exception; thus, web spiders or whatever google uses to search the web will not find it - unless they themselves subscribe and archive it. The referral to "search the archive" via google, is because SuSE's archive is not searchable. - -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFD1oITtTMYHG2NR9URAv/xAKCZKr9QT2n0+9emF4Ne17jQEvtIYwCeN1nx IzZDZlZT1A0Kg6SXGOU5Dps= =aUtn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----